Just my 2-cents: in general (not specifically referring to this Live review or any review in particular), I more or less ignore ign or any other mainstream gaming site's sports games reviews. They aren't sports gamers in the way that people here are, and they review games from a different angle than people here do. Oftentimes, these guys are under editor pressure to get a review out by a deadline, and so they jam in 6 hours or so with the game and bang out a review. The reviewer may or may not even be a big-time hoops/football/whatever fan - he's just the schlub they picked to review the game that month. I don't doubt that they pick someone who at least has some knowledge of the sport, but do they watch 100+ games a year? Do they really focus on the nuance that makes a sports game fun over the course of an entire year? Absolutely not - they probably never play the game again after they review it, because they have 20 other games to review over the next few months.
Ultimately, every review is just some dude's opinion, but I'd at least like that dude to be someone who expects realism from their sports games and intends to play through an entire season (or 4) to really get down and dirty with all the game's successes and flaws over the long haul. Some games are great when you play them for 2-3 hours...and then after a few days you can't stand the thing anymore, because all the flaws you didn't realize when you were just trying to figure out how to shoot the ball rear their ugly head. I think the reviews on here and some other trustworthy sports gaming info sources are really more in-tune with how we as sports gamers will feel about a product, but again, it's ultimately all just someone's opinion...
Comment