Vote for 2006-7 MVP Here

[ex carrabba fan]

Re: Vote for 2006-7 MVP Here

Kobe does not belong anywhere near MVP discussions. Please stop making Laker fans look bad.

[DJSebol]

Re: Vote for 2006-7 MVP Here

Please stop ruining the MVP thread with Kobe clutter. He has his own thread. Take that garbage in there!

FYI.....Your buddy Kashanova started it

[23]

Re: Vote for 2006-7 MVP Here

I could care less. Take it to the Kobe thread where nobody want's to read this crap.

[Kashanova]

Re: Vote for 2006-7 MVP Here

What? Dude... you are full of ****. Without Kobe the Lakers are selecting Greg Oden with the no.1 pick.

no with out kobe there a non playoff team something they almost are with him you gonna give him the award for a a low playoff seed thats almost as bad as being at the end of the lottery

[Kashanova]

Re: Vote for 2006-7 MVP Here

FYI.....Your buddy Kashanova started it

no i didn't someone mention something bout him having to avg 60 points to win it like if he were the clear cut winner even with imo lebron and tmac did more for their teams to win

[TheMatrix31]

Re: Vote for 2006-7 MVP Here

Take those personal insults in there....so that thread gets locked.

[dossier]

Re: Vote for 2006-7 MVP Here

Yeah Kobe belongs in MVP discussion.

I think Nash deserves it the most even though Dirks team is the best, Nash is the focal point of the team and they are not as deep as the Mavs.

[Kashanova]

Re: Vote for 2006-7 MVP Here

my top 5
Dirk
Nash
Tmac
Lebron
Bosh

[ZB9]

Re: Vote for 2006-7 MVP Here

Nash is the focal point of the team and they are not as deep as the Mavs.

you dont think Dirk is the focal point of the Mavs? how many Mavs games have you seen in the past couple of seasons? You dont have to be a point guard to be the focal point of your team, although PGs obviously handle the ball on every play.

and both players have a good supporting cast. supporting cast is not an argument for either player.

[platic]

Re: Vote for 2006-7 MVP Here

I'm not sure why people keep thinking the Mavs are still a deep team. Their top 6 players are pretty good --- Nowitzki, Howard, Terry, Stackhouse, Dampier, and Devin Harris.

But what comes after the top 6? Well, there's a bunch of rejects that would have a hard time cracking a 7-man rotation for the worst teams in the league.

Austin Croshere (3.7 ppg), DeSagana Diop (2.3 ppg), Maurice Ager (2.2 ppg), Greg Buckner (4.0 ppg), DJ Mbenga (0.8 ppg), and Devean friggin' George (6.4 ppg). And oh yeah, the fossil remains of Kevin Willis have been unearthed and promoted to 3rd string center behind Diop.

The Mavericks are a talented bunch, but they are only 6-players deep. If Nowitzki goes down, do they even have a serviceable PF to take his place? Nope, the best they have is Austin Croshere's 3.7 ppg and 3.0 rpg. If Erik Dampier hurts his back again, can they rely on DeSagana Diop and his 2 ppg 5 rpg as a starting center for a championship team? If Jerry Stackhouse is ejected, is there anybody on the bench that can score more than 7 points in a game?

The days of Eddie Najera, Marquis Daniels, Josh Howard, Antoine Walker, Antawn Jamison, Nick Van Exel, Raef LaFrentz, and/or Raja Bell on the bench are long gone. But apparently not many people have noticed, because those talking heads on NBA Broadcasts keep saying the Mavs are a deep team.

[SoMiss2000]

Re: Vote for 2006-7 MVP Here

I'm not sure why people keep thinking the Mavs are still a deep team. Their top 6 players are pretty good --- Nowitzki, Howard, Terry, Stackhouse, Dampier, and Devin Harris.

But what comes after the top 6? Well, there's a bunch of rejects that would have a hard time cracking a 7-man rotation for the worst teams in the league.

Austin Croshere (3.7 ppg), DeSagana Diop (2.3 ppg), Maurice Ager (2.2 ppg), Greg Buckner (4.0 ppg), DJ Mbenga (0.8 ppg), and Devean friggin' George (6.4 ppg). And oh yeah, the fossil remains of Kevin Willis have been unearthed and promoted to 3rd string center behind Diop.

The Mavericks are a talented bunch, but they are only 6-players deep. If Nowitzki goes down, do they even have a serviceable PF to take his place? Nope, the best they have is Austin Croshere's 3.7 ppg and 3.0 rpg. If Erik Dampier hurts his back again, can they rely on DeSagana Diop and his 2 ppg 5 rpg as a starting center for a championship team? If Jerry Stackhouse is ejected, is there anybody on the bench that can score more than 7 points in a game?

The days of Eddie Najera, Marquis Daniels, Josh Howard, Antoine Walker, Antawn Jamison, Nick Van Exel, Raef LaFrentz, and/or Raja Bell on the bench are long gone. But apparently not many people have noticed, because those talking heads on NBA Broadcasts keep saying the Mavs are a deep team.

sigh

[dossier]

Re: Vote for 2006-7 MVP Here

you dont think Dirk is the focal point of the Mavs? how many Mavs games have you seen in the past couple of seasons? You dont have to be a point guard to be the focal point of your team, although PGs obviously handle the ball on every play.

and both players have a good supporting cast. supporting cast is not an argument for either player.

That came out wrong, I meant to say that Suns run on Nash, and the Mavs run on Josh and Dirk

[Kashanova]

Re: Vote for 2006-7 MVP Here

can someone add tmac to the poll how kobe has 12 votes is beyond me

[aa2ba]

Re: Vote for 2006-7 MVP Here

can someone add tmac to the poll how kobe has 12 votes is beyond me

I like the sig, it says it all. But lets face it, the man has his own thread on this site. He obviouslly has a few fans here.

[aa2ba]

Re: Vote for 2006-7 MVP Here

Yeah Kobe belongs in MVP discussion.

I think Nash deserves it the most even though Dirks team is the best, Nash is the focal point of the team and they are not as deep as the Mavs.

How can you vote for Nash as the MVP, ie. best player in the leauge for most intent and purposes, and claim (in another thread) that J-Kidd is the best PG in the NBA?