OSU, I'm going to look up the thread where Jamison got traded, to see what you said. I'll be back.
1. How much of that regular season success was due purely because of James' brilliance? I would wager more than a lot that you couldn't just plop any other SG or SF in that situation, and that if you did, CLE would struggle to have home court advantage in the first round.
They built around James the best they could, but it all goes back to the fact that they had not much to work with at the beginning of the LBJ era. So it was more of makeshift moves to get help "now" as you put it. That sentiment I agree with, it's sooooo obvious that you do the Jamison deal at that point. You had to risk it, Jamison could have finally been his Robin. Alas he's not, he's more of a third wheel.
2. No, CLE doesn't have just a good a chance as ORL or BOS [if they stay together]. They aren't far behind if they keep James, but they aren't on that level at all from top to bottom, coaches and players.
I've been repeating this exact post for a while now so it's pointless to keep this up, I apologize.
As I've said, James masks a lot of problems, because he is simply that good. The regular season means nothing, James is the perfect regular season player. He has a lot of issues [giving up in the playoffs for some inexplicable reason] and once the bright lights hit, the bigger issues of his teammates/coaches were exposed.
Just because "they had the best record two years in a row" doesn't mean they have an acceptable cast of characters. What it shows is how good James was during the regular season.
Comment