Eastern Conference Playoffs - Second Round Discussion Thread

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • RayAllen20
    MVP
    • Jun 2009
    • 1825

    #1051
    Re: Eastern Conference Playoffs - Second Round Discussion Thread

    Originally posted by Weeks
    I care when an 85% FT shooter gets fouled from 3 when it's a 6 point game with 2:30 minutes left.
    But that wasn't a foul...which is why Salvatore said his whistle was inadvertant.
    I will always, always be a Jets fan. But trust me it hurts.

    Comment

    • da ThRONe
      Fire LesS Miles ASAP!
      • Mar 2009
      • 8528

      #1052
      Re: Eastern Conference Playoffs - Second Round Discussion Thread

      Originally posted by Marino
      Well if you admit he gets "star calls" then you shouldn't complain about the refs.
      I was thinking the same thing. Just because you drive a lot doesn't mean you should get "STAR CALLS".

      The one where Rose tied the game at 80 with the tear drop was a prime example. He got the and 1 but there was barely any contact if any.
      You looking at the Chair MAN!

      Number may not tell the whole story ,but they never lie either.

      Comment

      • da ThRONe
        Fire LesS Miles ASAP!
        • Mar 2009
        • 8528

        #1053
        Re: Eastern Conference Playoffs - Second Round Discussion Thread

        Personally I hope the league gets rid of that call anyways. There is no way the offensives guy should jump into the defender and draw a call. This and flopping IMO has to be dealt with.
        You looking at the Chair MAN!

        Number may not tell the whole story ,but they never lie either.

        Comment

        • The 24th Letter
          ERA
          • Oct 2007
          • 39373

          #1054
          Re: Eastern Conference Playoffs - Second Round Discussion Thread

          I wont really get in the ref convo....

          but "inadvertant whistle" = I made a bad call and want to take it back

          I find it hard to believe the ref accidently blew there lol

          Comment

          • bakan723
            Banned
            • Aug 2010
            • 1543

            #1055
            Re: Eastern Conference Playoffs - Second Round Discussion Thread

            Originally posted by Subversion
            Korver on Teague.

            GJ coach.
            Exactly. Why the hell is he even playing so much ? Especially if he's not knocking down shots ?

            Comment

            • mKoz26
              In case you forgot...
              • Jan 2009
              • 4685

              #1056
              Re: Eastern Conference Playoffs - Second Round Discussion Thread

              Originally posted by RayAllen20
              But that wasn't a foul...which is why Salvatore said his whistle was inadvertant.
              So that's only a foul when Luol Deng is the defender?

              Did you really watch the game?
              Bears | Bulls | Cubs | Illinois | #Team3Some

              @CDonkey26

              Originally posted by baumy300
              Yeah, she may be a bit of a beotch, but you get back to me when you find out a way to motorboat personality...

              Comment

              • lilbiggio
                MVP
                • Jun 2004
                • 2105

                #1057
                Re: Eastern Conference Playoffs - Second Round Discussion Thread

                Originally posted by The 24th Letter
                I wont really get in the ref convo....

                but "inadvertant whistle" = I made a bad call and want to take it back

                I find it hard to believe the ref accidently blew there lol
                lol I'd rather him just be like, you know what that actually wasn't a foul my bad bro tap his chest a couple of times and then move on... than pretend like it was an accidental whistle that had nothing to do with the play at hand....

                Comment

                • The 24th Letter
                  ERA
                  • Oct 2007
                  • 39373

                  #1058
                  Re: Eastern Conference Playoffs - Second Round Discussion Thread

                  lol exactly....

                  Comment

                  • The 24th Letter
                    ERA
                    • Oct 2007
                    • 39373

                    #1059
                    Re: Eastern Conference Playoffs - Second Round Discussion Thread

                    Man, I hope Rondo doesnt jack his arm up trying to play tommorow....too young for that man..

                    Comment

                    • Yeah...THAT Guy
                      Once in a Lifetime Memory
                      • Dec 2006
                      • 17294

                      #1060
                      Re: Eastern Conference Playoffs - Second Round Discussion Thread

                      Originally posted by mKoz26
                      The refs blessed the Hawks with this victory.

                      The Bulls played better basketball than the Hawks today and lost. That's not supposed to happen.
                      The Bulls shot 41% from 2 point range and 18% from 3 point range, while the Hawks shot 49% and 36%. The Bulls shot more free throws and made about the same % as the Hawks. Your star player shot 12/32, you allowed Josh Smith to rack up 16 rebounds, Luol Deng was jacking 3's (and missing almost all of them), and outside of Carlos Boozer, nobody on that team played well offensively, and you seriously think you outplayed the Hawks, who played arguably their best game of the series?

                      Also, the Hawks starters shot 56% while the Bulls starters shot 43.5%, and if it weren't for Carlos Boozer, they would have only shot 38%. Just admit the Hawks played well and the Bulls didn't and move on. It's a tied series. Not like yall are about to get swept.
                      Last edited by Yeah...THAT Guy; 05-08-2011, 10:34 PM.
                      NFL: Bills
                      NBA: Bucks
                      MLB: Cubs
                      NCAA: Syracuse
                      Soccer: USMNT/DC United

                      PSN: ButMyT-GunDont

                      Comment

                      • mKoz26
                        In case you forgot...
                        • Jan 2009
                        • 4685

                        #1061
                        Re: Eastern Conference Playoffs - Second Round Discussion Thread

                        Originally posted by Yeah...THAT Guy
                        The Bulls shot 41% from 2 point range and 18% from 3 point range, while the Hawks shot 49% and 36%. The Bulls shot more free throws and made about the same % as the Hawks. Your star player shot 12/32, you allowed Josh Smith to rack up 16 rebounds, Luol Deng was jacking 3's (and missing almost all of them), and outside of Carlos Boozer, nobody on that team played well offensively, and you seriously think you outplayed the Hawks, who played arguably their best game of the series?
                        Watching the game, aside from 3-point shooting, the Bulls outplayed the Hawks completely.

                        Yes.

                        If consistency from the refs determined foul calls, the Bulls would've had another 6-10 important free throws, too. The Rose 3, earlier Deng 2 in the same way, and a few layups where Rose just got absolutely molested. Those would've made a huge difference down the stretch.
                        Bears | Bulls | Cubs | Illinois | #Team3Some

                        @CDonkey26

                        Originally posted by baumy300
                        Yeah, she may be a bit of a beotch, but you get back to me when you find out a way to motorboat personality...

                        Comment

                        • mKoz26
                          In case you forgot...
                          • Jan 2009
                          • 4685

                          #1062
                          Re: Eastern Conference Playoffs - Second Round Discussion Thread

                          Originally posted by Yeah...THAT Guy
                          Also, the Hawks starters shot 56% while the Bulls starters shot 43.5%, and if it weren't for Carlos Boozer, they would have only shot 38%. Just admit the Hawks played well and the Bulls didn't and move on. It's a tied series. Not like yall are about to get swept.
                          Shooting percentages <> quality of play.
                          Bears | Bulls | Cubs | Illinois | #Team3Some

                          @CDonkey26

                          Originally posted by baumy300
                          Yeah, she may be a bit of a beotch, but you get back to me when you find out a way to motorboat personality...

                          Comment

                          • Yeah...THAT Guy
                            Once in a Lifetime Memory
                            • Dec 2006
                            • 17294

                            #1063
                            Re: Eastern Conference Playoffs - Second Round Discussion Thread

                            Originally posted by mKoz26
                            Watching the game, aside from 3-point shooting, the Bulls outplayed the Hawks completely.

                            Yes.

                            If consistency from the refs determined foul calls, the Bulls would've had another 6-10 important free throws, too. The Rose 3, earlier Deng 2 in the same way, and a few layups where Rose just got absolutely molested. Those would've made a huge difference down the stretch.
                            They just didn't outplay them dude. I'm sorry, but they didn't. The Hawks moved the ball better tonight then any of the other 3 games as far as I remember. They shot the ball much better, and got easy looks. If anyone on the team besides Carlos Boozer could make a shot, then sure, maybe then the Bulls would have played a better game, but nobody on that team shot worth a damn tonight and they allowed Josh Smith to put together one hell of a game. This was an impressive win for the Hawks.

                            Edit: Not to mention, even if the Bulls had made 7 additional free throws, they still would have lost. The Hawks got good looks and knocked them down while the Bulls struggled the entire night. Not to mention you had Rose throw up at least 36 or so shots when he obviously wasn't making anything.
                            Last edited by Yeah...THAT Guy; 05-08-2011, 10:43 PM.
                            NFL: Bills
                            NBA: Bucks
                            MLB: Cubs
                            NCAA: Syracuse
                            Soccer: USMNT/DC United

                            PSN: ButMyT-GunDont

                            Comment

                            • BlueNGold
                              Hall Of Fame
                              • Aug 2009
                              • 21817

                              #1064
                              Re: Eastern Conference Playoffs - Second Round Discussion Thread

                              I just love "refs cost us the game" talk and "did you even watch the game?" insults. We don't get enough of that around here.
                              Originally posted by bradtxmale
                              I like 6 inches. Its not too thin and not too thick. You get the support your body needs.



                              Comment

                              • Chowdah
                                Rookie
                                • May 2011
                                • 97

                                #1065
                                Re: Eastern Conference Playoffs - Second Round Discussion Thread

                                I will be honest if we beat Boston in this series an make it to the finals I don't want us to play the Mavericks they excel at everything we don't a bench an bigs. Right now the MAVS are the best team left. they have a deep bench an a 7'0 shooting guard
                                U.S ARMY
                                92G
                                2 infantry division
                                210 fires brigade
                                579fsc
                                6 months till come back home

                                HOOOAH!

                                Comment

                                Working...