seems like the tax issue is the only thing holding a deal back...
NBA Lockout and Collective Bargaining Agreement Discussion
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: NBA Lockout and Collective Barganing Agreement Discussion
seems like the tax issue is the only thing holding a deal back... -
Re: NBA Lockout and Collective Barganing Agreement Discussion
If they **** this one up, I'm willing to bet you there will not be an NBA season. This is about as close they're going to get to a deal and if both parties can't get their heads out of their asses this time, you might as well cancel the season.I have more respect for a man who let's me know where he stands, even if he's wrong. Than the one who comes up like an angel and is nothing but a devil. - Malcolm XComment
-
Re: NBA Lockout and Collective Barganing Agreement Discussion
Too bad the tax issue is a "blood issue". The players will not accept anything that resembles a hard cap and the owners want something that has that effect. Here's hoping they can find a middle ground.Comment
-
Re: NBA Lockout and Collective Barganing Agreement Discussion
That's something that really confused me about the players. They were more willing to give more in the BRI split than give to a hard cap system.You looking at the Chair MAN!
Number may not tell the whole story ,but they never lie either.Comment
-
Re: NBA Lockout and Collective Barganing Agreement Discussion
[spoiler]<iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/p6TrQzNTrRA" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" width="560"></iframe>[/SPOILER]Ericmaynor3.com
Comment
-
Re: NBA Lockout and Collective Barganing Agreement Discussion
Is it too late to fix the voting process for the All Star Teams as well?
Yea I know, wishful thinking lol#RespectTheCultureComment
-
Comment
-
Re: NBA Lockout and Collective Barganing Agreement Discussion
When you have a union thats controlled by superstars, the hard cap means alot more to them then the BRI. A Hard cap prevents superteams and caps superstars salaries even further.Comment
-
Re: NBA Lockout and Collective Barganing Agreement Discussion
Yeah I know, that's why I said wishful thinking because I doubt they would waste time on that but I figured **** since you're working hard on the "small things" might as well take care of that too haha.
More like a hook a brother up type of deal lol.#RespectTheCultureComment
-
Re: NBA Lockout and Collective Barganing Agreement Discussion
These are the kinds of things I dont agree with them on of course...
..but its not like the love the game enough to go there so oh wellComment
-
Re: NBA Lockout and Collective Barganing Agreement Discussion
I think it's *** backwards of the owner to complain about losing money and competitive balance then push this amnesty thing.You looking at the Chair MAN!
Number may not tell the whole story ,but they never lie either.Comment
-
Re: NBA Lockout and Collective Barganing Agreement Discussion
You have a situation where the Bobcats and T-Wolves are in the Finals...that is not good. Not good at all. Unless the NBA manages to manufacture more "superstars". I suppose they could hype Derrick and Kemba in that situation...Comment
-
Re: NBA Lockout and Collective Barganing Agreement Discussion
Then you'd end up with something similar to Baseball. Horrible TV ratings. Dudes would rather watch College Football than MLB playoffs in general. Why? Because the glamor teams aren't in it.
You have a situation where the Bobcats and T-Wolves are in the Finals...that is not good. Not good at all. Unless the NBA manages to manufacture more "superstars". I suppose they could hype Derrick and Kemba in that situation...Comment
-
Re: NBA Lockout and Collective Barganing Agreement Discussion
People love to kill the owners for bad contracts but thats all in hindsight. The two biggest current contracts that owners get killed on are Lewis and Arenas. In hindsight they look horrible. At the time, they looked like they overpaid but they werent horrible. Lewis was coming off three straight 20 plus point years and an all star appearance. Plus he was 25 at the time. Giving a max deal to a 20 plus point, 25 year old player isnt a horrible deal. What makes it horrible is that he regressed as a player.
I've already talked about the Arenas deal but at the time it wasnt a horrible deal either. No one knew that knee injury would keep him out for almost 3 yrs.
GMs are always going to make bad calls but I think allowing them to correct mistakes does a ton for competitive balance.Comment
Comment