Not a matter of IF, but WHEN the Spurs repeat!

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ATrillionaire
    Pro
    • Aug 2003
    • 839

    #151
    Re: Not a matter of IF, but WHEN the Spurs repeat!

    </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
    utexas said:
    It is on now, the new fab five (Nash,Nowitski,Finley,Jamison,Walker) plus Fortson,Best, delk, howard, bradley. Opening Night we wreck the Fakers, then anybody else that wants some.

    <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">



    3 years out of the last 4 the Fakers have been doing some hella Faking cause they had me convinced they won 3 championships.


    I love how people say Nash plays so hard during the regular season that he loses steam in the playoffs.....Me, I just call it CHOKE!!!

    Comment

    • NYC_2K4
      B*rn *g**n B*l**v*r & G*m*r
      • Aug 2003
      • 360

      #152
      Re: Not a matter of IF, but WHEN the Spurs repeat!

      Thats why Parker owns francis in head-2-head matchups. Correct me if I am wrong, but in one game last yr, Coach Rudy T pulled Francis out of the game b/c Parker was treating him like his B***h!
      But this is the NBA where most players &amp; fans only care about stats &amp; dunks &amp; not about team ball &amp; winning it for the team.
      I'll take Parker over any PG 2day. Oh &amp; where are the M.Bibby [censored you naughty boy] who were trying to roast me for saying Parker was better last yr? Ha!

      Comment

      • NYC_2K4
        B*rn *g**n B*l**v*r & G*m*r
        • Aug 2003
        • 360

        #153
        Re: Not a matter of IF, but WHEN the Spurs repeat!

        Thats why Parker owns francis in head-2-head matchups. Correct me if I am wrong, but in one game last yr, Coach Rudy T pulled Francis out of the game b/c Parker was treating him like his B***h!
        But this is the NBA where most players &amp; fans only care about stats &amp; dunks &amp; not about team ball &amp; winning it for the team.
        I'll take Parker over any PG 2day. Oh &amp; where are the M.Bibby [censored you naughty boy] who were trying to roast me for saying Parker was better last yr? Ha!

        Comment

        • NYC_2K4
          B*rn *g**n B*l**v*r & G*m*r
          • Aug 2003
          • 360

          #154
          Re: Not a matter of IF, but WHEN the Spurs repeat!

          Thats why Parker owns francis in head-2-head matchups. Correct me if I am wrong, but in one game last yr, Coach Rudy T pulled Francis out of the game b/c Parker was treating him like his B***h!
          But this is the NBA where most players &amp; fans only care about stats &amp; dunks &amp; not about team ball &amp; winning it for the team.
          I'll take Parker over any PG 2day. Oh &amp; where are the M.Bibby [censored you naughty boy] who were trying to roast me for saying Parker was better last yr? Ha!

          Comment

          • bigeastbumrush
            My Momma's Son
            • Feb 2003
            • 19245

            #155
            Re: Not a matter of IF, but WHEN the Spurs repeat!

            </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
            NYC_2K4 said:
            I'll take Parker over any PG 2day.

            <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

            What if Tony Parker and Stephon Marbury changed teams.

            Comment

            • bigeastbumrush
              My Momma's Son
              • Feb 2003
              • 19245

              #156
              Re: Not a matter of IF, but WHEN the Spurs repeat!

              </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
              NYC_2K4 said:
              I'll take Parker over any PG 2day.

              <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

              What if Tony Parker and Stephon Marbury changed teams.

              Comment

              • bigeastbumrush
                My Momma's Son
                • Feb 2003
                • 19245

                #157
                Re: Not a matter of IF, but WHEN the Spurs repeat!

                </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                NYC_2K4 said:
                I'll take Parker over any PG 2day.

                <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                What if Tony Parker and Stephon Marbury changed teams.

                Comment

                • Admiral50
                  Banned
                  • Aug 2002
                  • 3311

                  #158
                  Re: Not a matter of IF, but WHEN the Spurs repeat!

                  </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                  ATrillionaire said:
                  </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                  SKINSFAN0303 said:
                  </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                  jordan0386 said:
                  </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                  Admiral50 said:
                  Duncan can't be matched for starters and when he is double and tripled, then their backcourt and other load of bench players become that much better and more important.

                  These are great days for a Spurs fan, we have guards who can shoot and score, great role players and a ton of 3 point shooters. If Rose and Nesterovic can play well, then they will certainly be better than last year.

                  Oh and I'd take Ginobili over Kittles, Hardaway, Sprewell or Mobley. And I'd take Parker over Francis, Cassel, Billups or Nash too.

                  <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                  no no no...im not takin parker over nash...you see how effective the PAR is with him and nowitski...imagine duncan and nash...billups...push...he had solid season...their identical to me...francis is an all-around guard so it depends on what your looking for...he could board better then parker...

                  <hr /></blockquote><font class="post"> francis could board better then parker??? francis boards better then parker no question about it..now i don't fault you for loving your team nothing wrong with that but tony parker is not the top guard in the nba and mano.. has yet to prove anything over a whole season best backcourt in the league nope sorry but nothing wrong with loving your team though and the spurs will not be repeating anything just so you know the spurs played a out of shape shaq led laker team horry had the worst 3pt shooting slump in the history of the playoffs..then got away from playing the kings because webber got hurt then played dallas without dirk for 4 of the games and they played the nets with kenyon martin who got a bad case of the flu and woke up thinking he was larry bird and started shooting 3's and 20 footers.. wtf was that but for real they won and they are the champs but there will be not be that many breaks this year ..

                  <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">




                  People can talk about the Spurs, the new and improved Mav and Wolves, but the fact of the matter is not one of those teams stand a chance against a healthy and clicking Laker and Sacramento team. Everybody wrote of the Kings, but there is no doubt in every Laker fan's mind that the Kings are the true enemies. The Spurs were lucky The Admiral had some divine connections cause Shaq played the worst ball in his life, Rick Fox and his replacement Devon George were hurt, and Robert Horry was truly disgusting, and on the other side, the Kings lose their go to guy. Thx David

                  <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                  Umm it's called a great Spurs defense. All these so called guys playing their worst or in terrible slumps is usually due to the Spurs D, thank you very much. And I am so f#cking sick of all the cry babies out there who NEVER give the Spurs credit. First they all asterix their first title (Phil Jackson - go eat s#it!) then they cry with every excuse under the sun during the Lakers series and say Spurs got lucky with the injury to Dirk. The form Duncan was in was amazing and he was actually improving every time he stepped onto the court, so I fancy the Spurs against any healthy team. But the fact is injuries occur, get over it. We missed Duncan for the playoffs a few years ago and simply shut up about it and still tried our best. And Martin was either told to step out to bring Duncan with him, or he was like many guys who was just too scared to muscle up. Which is funny, considering all the crap he talked about before the series started.

                  Comment

                  • Admiral50
                    Banned
                    • Aug 2002
                    • 3311

                    #159
                    Re: Not a matter of IF, but WHEN the Spurs repeat!

                    </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                    ATrillionaire said:
                    </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                    SKINSFAN0303 said:
                    </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                    jordan0386 said:
                    </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                    Admiral50 said:
                    Duncan can't be matched for starters and when he is double and tripled, then their backcourt and other load of bench players become that much better and more important.

                    These are great days for a Spurs fan, we have guards who can shoot and score, great role players and a ton of 3 point shooters. If Rose and Nesterovic can play well, then they will certainly be better than last year.

                    Oh and I'd take Ginobili over Kittles, Hardaway, Sprewell or Mobley. And I'd take Parker over Francis, Cassel, Billups or Nash too.

                    <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                    no no no...im not takin parker over nash...you see how effective the PAR is with him and nowitski...imagine duncan and nash...billups...push...he had solid season...their identical to me...francis is an all-around guard so it depends on what your looking for...he could board better then parker...

                    <hr /></blockquote><font class="post"> francis could board better then parker??? francis boards better then parker no question about it..now i don't fault you for loving your team nothing wrong with that but tony parker is not the top guard in the nba and mano.. has yet to prove anything over a whole season best backcourt in the league nope sorry but nothing wrong with loving your team though and the spurs will not be repeating anything just so you know the spurs played a out of shape shaq led laker team horry had the worst 3pt shooting slump in the history of the playoffs..then got away from playing the kings because webber got hurt then played dallas without dirk for 4 of the games and they played the nets with kenyon martin who got a bad case of the flu and woke up thinking he was larry bird and started shooting 3's and 20 footers.. wtf was that but for real they won and they are the champs but there will be not be that many breaks this year ..

                    <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">




                    People can talk about the Spurs, the new and improved Mav and Wolves, but the fact of the matter is not one of those teams stand a chance against a healthy and clicking Laker and Sacramento team. Everybody wrote of the Kings, but there is no doubt in every Laker fan's mind that the Kings are the true enemies. The Spurs were lucky The Admiral had some divine connections cause Shaq played the worst ball in his life, Rick Fox and his replacement Devon George were hurt, and Robert Horry was truly disgusting, and on the other side, the Kings lose their go to guy. Thx David

                    <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                    Umm it's called a great Spurs defense. All these so called guys playing their worst or in terrible slumps is usually due to the Spurs D, thank you very much. And I am so f#cking sick of all the cry babies out there who NEVER give the Spurs credit. First they all asterix their first title (Phil Jackson - go eat s#it!) then they cry with every excuse under the sun during the Lakers series and say Spurs got lucky with the injury to Dirk. The form Duncan was in was amazing and he was actually improving every time he stepped onto the court, so I fancy the Spurs against any healthy team. But the fact is injuries occur, get over it. We missed Duncan for the playoffs a few years ago and simply shut up about it and still tried our best. And Martin was either told to step out to bring Duncan with him, or he was like many guys who was just too scared to muscle up. Which is funny, considering all the crap he talked about before the series started.

                    Comment

                    • Admiral50
                      Banned
                      • Aug 2002
                      • 3311

                      #160
                      Re: Not a matter of IF, but WHEN the Spurs repeat!

                      </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                      ATrillionaire said:
                      </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                      SKINSFAN0303 said:
                      </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                      jordan0386 said:
                      </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                      Admiral50 said:
                      Duncan can't be matched for starters and when he is double and tripled, then their backcourt and other load of bench players become that much better and more important.

                      These are great days for a Spurs fan, we have guards who can shoot and score, great role players and a ton of 3 point shooters. If Rose and Nesterovic can play well, then they will certainly be better than last year.

                      Oh and I'd take Ginobili over Kittles, Hardaway, Sprewell or Mobley. And I'd take Parker over Francis, Cassel, Billups or Nash too.

                      <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                      no no no...im not takin parker over nash...you see how effective the PAR is with him and nowitski...imagine duncan and nash...billups...push...he had solid season...their identical to me...francis is an all-around guard so it depends on what your looking for...he could board better then parker...

                      <hr /></blockquote><font class="post"> francis could board better then parker??? francis boards better then parker no question about it..now i don't fault you for loving your team nothing wrong with that but tony parker is not the top guard in the nba and mano.. has yet to prove anything over a whole season best backcourt in the league nope sorry but nothing wrong with loving your team though and the spurs will not be repeating anything just so you know the spurs played a out of shape shaq led laker team horry had the worst 3pt shooting slump in the history of the playoffs..then got away from playing the kings because webber got hurt then played dallas without dirk for 4 of the games and they played the nets with kenyon martin who got a bad case of the flu and woke up thinking he was larry bird and started shooting 3's and 20 footers.. wtf was that but for real they won and they are the champs but there will be not be that many breaks this year ..

                      <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">




                      People can talk about the Spurs, the new and improved Mav and Wolves, but the fact of the matter is not one of those teams stand a chance against a healthy and clicking Laker and Sacramento team. Everybody wrote of the Kings, but there is no doubt in every Laker fan's mind that the Kings are the true enemies. The Spurs were lucky The Admiral had some divine connections cause Shaq played the worst ball in his life, Rick Fox and his replacement Devon George were hurt, and Robert Horry was truly disgusting, and on the other side, the Kings lose their go to guy. Thx David

                      <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                      Umm it's called a great Spurs defense. All these so called guys playing their worst or in terrible slumps is usually due to the Spurs D, thank you very much. And I am so f#cking sick of all the cry babies out there who NEVER give the Spurs credit. First they all asterix their first title (Phil Jackson - go eat s#it!) then they cry with every excuse under the sun during the Lakers series and say Spurs got lucky with the injury to Dirk. The form Duncan was in was amazing and he was actually improving every time he stepped onto the court, so I fancy the Spurs against any healthy team. But the fact is injuries occur, get over it. We missed Duncan for the playoffs a few years ago and simply shut up about it and still tried our best. And Martin was either told to step out to bring Duncan with him, or he was like many guys who was just too scared to muscle up. Which is funny, considering all the crap he talked about before the series started.

                      Comment

                      • ATrillionaire
                        Pro
                        • Aug 2003
                        • 839

                        #161
                        Re: Not a matter of IF, but WHEN the Spurs repeat!

                        </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                        Admiral50 said:
                        </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                        ATrillionaire said:
                        </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                        SKINSFAN0303 said:
                        </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                        jordan0386 said:
                        </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                        Admiral50 said:
                        Duncan can't be matched for starters and when he is double and tripled, then their backcourt and other load of bench players become that much better and more important.

                        These are great days for a Spurs fan, we have guards who can shoot and score, great role players and a ton of 3 point shooters. If Rose and Nesterovic can play well, then they will certainly be better than last year.

                        Oh and I'd take Ginobili over Kittles, Hardaway, Sprewell or Mobley. And I'd take Parker over Francis, Cassel, Billups or Nash too.

                        <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                        no no no...im not takin parker over nash...you see how effective the PAR is with him and nowitski...imagine duncan and nash...billups...push...he had solid season...their identical to me...francis is an all-around guard so it depends on what your looking for...he could board better then parker...

                        <hr /></blockquote><font class="post"> francis could board better then parker??? francis boards better then parker no question about it..now i don't fault you for loving your team nothing wrong with that but tony parker is not the top guard in the nba and mano.. has yet to prove anything over a whole season best backcourt in the league nope sorry but nothing wrong with loving your team though and the spurs will not be repeating anything just so you know the spurs played a out of shape shaq led laker team horry had the worst 3pt shooting slump in the history of the playoffs..then got away from playing the kings because webber got hurt then played dallas without dirk for 4 of the games and they played the nets with kenyon martin who got a bad case of the flu and woke up thinking he was larry bird and started shooting 3's and 20 footers.. wtf was that but for real they won and they are the champs but there will be not be that many breaks this year ..

                        <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">




                        People can talk about the Spurs, the new and improved Mav and Wolves, but the fact of the matter is not one of those teams stand a chance against a healthy and clicking Laker and Sacramento team. Everybody wrote of the Kings, but there is no doubt in every Laker fan's mind that the Kings are the true enemies. The Spurs were lucky The Admiral had some divine connections cause Shaq played the worst ball in his life, Rick Fox and his replacement Devon George were hurt, and Robert Horry was truly disgusting, and on the other side, the Kings lose their go to guy. Thx David

                        <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                        Umm it's called a great Spurs defense. All these so called guys playing their worst or in terrible slumps is usually due to the Spurs D, thank you very much. And I am so f#cking sick of all the cry babies out there who NEVER give the Spurs credit. First they all asterix their first title (Phil Jackson - go eat s#it!) then they cry with every excuse under the sun during the Lakers series and say Spurs got lucky with the injury to Dirk. The form Duncan was in was amazing and he was actually improving every time he stepped onto the court, so I fancy the Spurs against any healthy team. But the fact is injuries occur, get over it. We missed Duncan for the playoffs a few years ago and simply shut up about it and still tried our best. And Martin was either told to step out to bring Duncan with him, or he was like many guys who was just too scared to muscle up. Which is funny, considering all the crap he talked about before the series started.


                        <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">


                        Their first title didn't count and yes, sorry, Duncan is a monster and the best player in the NBA, and dispite Dirk's injury(somemore divine intervention)I'd pick the Spurs, but don't credit Spurs defense for their victory of LA, cause LA slumped everywhere last year, not to mention their unexpected injuries(thx David) and the Kings lost(thx David).....face it, the championship was gift wrapped and they still had to work hard to get it. BTW, don't take it so personal, cursing out Phil Jackson and what not, it's a well known fact that the Spurs aren't good enough to beat the real Lakers and the Kings, nor exciting enough to boost a NBA Finals rating equivalent to that of Seinfield reruns


                        The only Spurs fans that live outside of Texas are either Monks or Punks.

                        Comment

                        • ATrillionaire
                          Pro
                          • Aug 2003
                          • 839

                          #162
                          Re: Not a matter of IF, but WHEN the Spurs repeat!

                          </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                          Admiral50 said:
                          </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                          ATrillionaire said:
                          </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                          SKINSFAN0303 said:
                          </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                          jordan0386 said:
                          </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                          Admiral50 said:
                          Duncan can't be matched for starters and when he is double and tripled, then their backcourt and other load of bench players become that much better and more important.

                          These are great days for a Spurs fan, we have guards who can shoot and score, great role players and a ton of 3 point shooters. If Rose and Nesterovic can play well, then they will certainly be better than last year.

                          Oh and I'd take Ginobili over Kittles, Hardaway, Sprewell or Mobley. And I'd take Parker over Francis, Cassel, Billups or Nash too.

                          <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                          no no no...im not takin parker over nash...you see how effective the PAR is with him and nowitski...imagine duncan and nash...billups...push...he had solid season...their identical to me...francis is an all-around guard so it depends on what your looking for...he could board better then parker...

                          <hr /></blockquote><font class="post"> francis could board better then parker??? francis boards better then parker no question about it..now i don't fault you for loving your team nothing wrong with that but tony parker is not the top guard in the nba and mano.. has yet to prove anything over a whole season best backcourt in the league nope sorry but nothing wrong with loving your team though and the spurs will not be repeating anything just so you know the spurs played a out of shape shaq led laker team horry had the worst 3pt shooting slump in the history of the playoffs..then got away from playing the kings because webber got hurt then played dallas without dirk for 4 of the games and they played the nets with kenyon martin who got a bad case of the flu and woke up thinking he was larry bird and started shooting 3's and 20 footers.. wtf was that but for real they won and they are the champs but there will be not be that many breaks this year ..

                          <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">




                          People can talk about the Spurs, the new and improved Mav and Wolves, but the fact of the matter is not one of those teams stand a chance against a healthy and clicking Laker and Sacramento team. Everybody wrote of the Kings, but there is no doubt in every Laker fan's mind that the Kings are the true enemies. The Spurs were lucky The Admiral had some divine connections cause Shaq played the worst ball in his life, Rick Fox and his replacement Devon George were hurt, and Robert Horry was truly disgusting, and on the other side, the Kings lose their go to guy. Thx David

                          <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                          Umm it's called a great Spurs defense. All these so called guys playing their worst or in terrible slumps is usually due to the Spurs D, thank you very much. And I am so f#cking sick of all the cry babies out there who NEVER give the Spurs credit. First they all asterix their first title (Phil Jackson - go eat s#it!) then they cry with every excuse under the sun during the Lakers series and say Spurs got lucky with the injury to Dirk. The form Duncan was in was amazing and he was actually improving every time he stepped onto the court, so I fancy the Spurs against any healthy team. But the fact is injuries occur, get over it. We missed Duncan for the playoffs a few years ago and simply shut up about it and still tried our best. And Martin was either told to step out to bring Duncan with him, or he was like many guys who was just too scared to muscle up. Which is funny, considering all the crap he talked about before the series started.


                          <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">


                          Their first title didn't count and yes, sorry, Duncan is a monster and the best player in the NBA, and dispite Dirk's injury(somemore divine intervention)I'd pick the Spurs, but don't credit Spurs defense for their victory of LA, cause LA slumped everywhere last year, not to mention their unexpected injuries(thx David) and the Kings lost(thx David).....face it, the championship was gift wrapped and they still had to work hard to get it. BTW, don't take it so personal, cursing out Phil Jackson and what not, it's a well known fact that the Spurs aren't good enough to beat the real Lakers and the Kings, nor exciting enough to boost a NBA Finals rating equivalent to that of Seinfield reruns


                          The only Spurs fans that live outside of Texas are either Monks or Punks.

                          Comment

                          • ATrillionaire
                            Pro
                            • Aug 2003
                            • 839

                            #163
                            Re: Not a matter of IF, but WHEN the Spurs repeat!

                            </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                            Admiral50 said:
                            </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                            ATrillionaire said:
                            </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                            SKINSFAN0303 said:
                            </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                            jordan0386 said:
                            </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                            Admiral50 said:
                            Duncan can't be matched for starters and when he is double and tripled, then their backcourt and other load of bench players become that much better and more important.

                            These are great days for a Spurs fan, we have guards who can shoot and score, great role players and a ton of 3 point shooters. If Rose and Nesterovic can play well, then they will certainly be better than last year.

                            Oh and I'd take Ginobili over Kittles, Hardaway, Sprewell or Mobley. And I'd take Parker over Francis, Cassel, Billups or Nash too.

                            <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                            no no no...im not takin parker over nash...you see how effective the PAR is with him and nowitski...imagine duncan and nash...billups...push...he had solid season...their identical to me...francis is an all-around guard so it depends on what your looking for...he could board better then parker...

                            <hr /></blockquote><font class="post"> francis could board better then parker??? francis boards better then parker no question about it..now i don't fault you for loving your team nothing wrong with that but tony parker is not the top guard in the nba and mano.. has yet to prove anything over a whole season best backcourt in the league nope sorry but nothing wrong with loving your team though and the spurs will not be repeating anything just so you know the spurs played a out of shape shaq led laker team horry had the worst 3pt shooting slump in the history of the playoffs..then got away from playing the kings because webber got hurt then played dallas without dirk for 4 of the games and they played the nets with kenyon martin who got a bad case of the flu and woke up thinking he was larry bird and started shooting 3's and 20 footers.. wtf was that but for real they won and they are the champs but there will be not be that many breaks this year ..

                            <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">




                            People can talk about the Spurs, the new and improved Mav and Wolves, but the fact of the matter is not one of those teams stand a chance against a healthy and clicking Laker and Sacramento team. Everybody wrote of the Kings, but there is no doubt in every Laker fan's mind that the Kings are the true enemies. The Spurs were lucky The Admiral had some divine connections cause Shaq played the worst ball in his life, Rick Fox and his replacement Devon George were hurt, and Robert Horry was truly disgusting, and on the other side, the Kings lose their go to guy. Thx David

                            <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                            Umm it's called a great Spurs defense. All these so called guys playing their worst or in terrible slumps is usually due to the Spurs D, thank you very much. And I am so f#cking sick of all the cry babies out there who NEVER give the Spurs credit. First they all asterix their first title (Phil Jackson - go eat s#it!) then they cry with every excuse under the sun during the Lakers series and say Spurs got lucky with the injury to Dirk. The form Duncan was in was amazing and he was actually improving every time he stepped onto the court, so I fancy the Spurs against any healthy team. But the fact is injuries occur, get over it. We missed Duncan for the playoffs a few years ago and simply shut up about it and still tried our best. And Martin was either told to step out to bring Duncan with him, or he was like many guys who was just too scared to muscle up. Which is funny, considering all the crap he talked about before the series started.


                            <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">


                            Their first title didn't count and yes, sorry, Duncan is a monster and the best player in the NBA, and dispite Dirk's injury(somemore divine intervention)I'd pick the Spurs, but don't credit Spurs defense for their victory of LA, cause LA slumped everywhere last year, not to mention their unexpected injuries(thx David) and the Kings lost(thx David).....face it, the championship was gift wrapped and they still had to work hard to get it. BTW, don't take it so personal, cursing out Phil Jackson and what not, it's a well known fact that the Spurs aren't good enough to beat the real Lakers and the Kings, nor exciting enough to boost a NBA Finals rating equivalent to that of Seinfield reruns


                            The only Spurs fans that live outside of Texas are either Monks or Punks.

                            Comment

                            • Lonestar210
                              Drive for 5
                              • Jul 2002
                              • 1012

                              #164
                              Re: Not a matter of IF, but WHEN the Spurs repeat!

                              We don't have to prove anything. When the lakers win no one questions them. When the Spurs win a title, everybody has an excuse.

                              Comment

                              • Lonestar210
                                Drive for 5
                                • Jul 2002
                                • 1012

                                #165
                                Re: Not a matter of IF, but WHEN the Spurs repeat!

                                We don't have to prove anything. When the lakers win no one questions them. When the Spurs win a title, everybody has an excuse.

                                Comment

                                Working...