Not a matter of IF, but WHEN the Spurs repeat!

**ATrillionaire** · 10-16-2003, 02:34 AM

Re: Not a matter of IF, but WHEN the Spurs repeat!

People talk about Kobe's field goal and 3pt percentage but

his 2pt 45.1% and his 3pt 3.83% is far far better than Parkers' AND
Kobe's shooting fallaway fadaways while double pumping over guys and he still shooting better......but that's not fair comparing Kobe to Parker....still you see my point as far as Francis goes.

**Admiral50** · 10-16-2003, 02:38 AM

Re: Not a matter of IF, but WHEN the Spurs repeat!

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
ATrillionaire said:
Francis 3pt percentage .354
Parker 3pt percentage .337

Francis 2pt percentage .435
Parker 2pt percentage .418

Seeing that Francis will get double teamed and Parker won't, I'd say Francis is the better shooter.

<hr /></blockquote>

Last yars stats -
Francis -
overall fg% = 43.5%
3 point % = 35.4%

Parker -
overall fg% = 46.4%
3 point % = 33.1%

I dunno, how often would Francis have even been doubled? And regardless of stats I just think I see Parker as the better shooter, maybe I am imaging it wrong and am wrong. Fine. I still personally prefer my choices

**Admiral50** · 10-16-2003, 02:38 AM

Re: Not a matter of IF, but WHEN the Spurs repeat!

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
ATrillionaire said:
Francis 3pt percentage .354
Parker 3pt percentage .337

Francis 2pt percentage .435
Parker 2pt percentage .418

Seeing that Francis will get double teamed and Parker won't, I'd say Francis is the better shooter.

<hr /></blockquote>

Last yars stats -
Francis -
overall fg% = 43.5%
3 point % = 35.4%

Parker -
overall fg% = 46.4%
3 point % = 33.1%

I dunno, how often would Francis have even been doubled? And regardless of stats I just think I see Parker as the better shooter, maybe I am imaging it wrong and am wrong. Fine. I still personally prefer my choices

**Admiral50** · 10-16-2003, 02:38 AM

Re: Not a matter of IF, but WHEN the Spurs repeat!

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
ATrillionaire said:
Francis 3pt percentage .354
Parker 3pt percentage .337

Francis 2pt percentage .435
Parker 2pt percentage .418

Seeing that Francis will get double teamed and Parker won't, I'd say Francis is the better shooter.

<hr /></blockquote>

Last yars stats -
Francis -
overall fg% = 43.5%
3 point % = 35.4%

Parker -
overall fg% = 46.4%
3 point % = 33.1%

I dunno, how often would Francis have even been doubled? And regardless of stats I just think I see Parker as the better shooter, maybe I am imaging it wrong and am wrong. Fine. I still personally prefer my choices

**jordan0386** · 10-16-2003, 02:41 AM

Re: Not a matter of IF, but WHEN the Spurs repeat!

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Admiral50 said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
ATrillionaire said:
Francis 3pt percentage .354
Parker 3pt percentage .337

Francis 2pt percentage .435
Parker 2pt percentage .418

Seeing that Francis will get double teamed and Parker won't, I'd say Francis is the better shooter.

<hr /></blockquote>

Last yars stats -
Francis -
overall fg% = 43.5%
3 point % = 35.4%

Parker -
overall fg% = 46.4%
3 point % = 33.1%

I dunno, how often would Francis have even been doubled? And regardless of stats I just think I see Parker as the better shooter, maybe I am imaging it wrong and am wrong. Fine. I still personally prefer my choices

<hr /></blockquote>

of course...lol...he got your team a ring

...dont forget the trophy

**jordan0386** · 10-16-2003, 02:41 AM

Re: Not a matter of IF, but WHEN the Spurs repeat!

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Admiral50 said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
ATrillionaire said:
Francis 3pt percentage .354
Parker 3pt percentage .337

Francis 2pt percentage .435
Parker 2pt percentage .418

Seeing that Francis will get double teamed and Parker won't, I'd say Francis is the better shooter.

<hr /></blockquote>

Last yars stats -
Francis -
overall fg% = 43.5%
3 point % = 35.4%

Parker -
overall fg% = 46.4%
3 point % = 33.1%

I dunno, how often would Francis have even been doubled? And regardless of stats I just think I see Parker as the better shooter, maybe I am imaging it wrong and am wrong. Fine. I still personally prefer my choices

<hr /></blockquote>

of course...lol...he got your team a ring

...dont forget the trophy

**jordan0386** · 10-16-2003, 02:41 AM

Re: Not a matter of IF, but WHEN the Spurs repeat!

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Admiral50 said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
ATrillionaire said:
Francis 3pt percentage .354
Parker 3pt percentage .337

Francis 2pt percentage .435
Parker 2pt percentage .418

Seeing that Francis will get double teamed and Parker won't, I'd say Francis is the better shooter.

<hr /></blockquote>

Last yars stats -
Francis -
overall fg% = 43.5%
3 point % = 35.4%

Parker -
overall fg% = 46.4%
3 point % = 33.1%

I dunno, how often would Francis have even been doubled? And regardless of stats I just think I see Parker as the better shooter, maybe I am imaging it wrong and am wrong. Fine. I still personally prefer my choices

<hr /></blockquote>

of course...lol...he got your team a ring

...dont forget the trophy

**ATrillionaire** · 10-16-2003, 02:44 AM

Re: Not a matter of IF, but WHEN the Spurs repeat!

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Admiral50 said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
ATrillionaire said:
Francis 3pt percentage .354
Parker 3pt percentage .337

Francis 2pt percentage .435
Parker 2pt percentage .418

Seeing that Francis will get double teamed and Parker won't, I'd say Francis is the better shooter.

<hr /></blockquote>

Last yars stats -
Francis -
overall fg% = 43.5%
3 point % = 35.4%

Parker -
overall fg% = 46.4%
3 point % = 33.1%
 Which could mean that Francis has progressed and Parker has regressed(he's an even worst 3pt shooter last year) 
I dunno, how often would Francis have even been doubled? Very Often And regardless of stats I just think I see Parker as the better shooter, maybe I am imaging it wrong and am wrong C'mon, San Antonio played a lot of games on TV last year, how many times have your heard analysist saying that Parker needs to improve his shot. The guy can't buy a 3, he doesn't even jump when he shoots them. . Fine. I still personally prefer my choices

<hr /></blockquote>

I understand you prefer Parker, I mean, your a SA fan, they've won the championship, so why would you want to change. All I'm saying is, don't for one second believe the Spurs wouldn't dump Parker in a alley if they were given Steve Francis.

**ATrillionaire** · 10-16-2003, 02:44 AM

Re: Not a matter of IF, but WHEN the Spurs repeat!

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Admiral50 said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
ATrillionaire said:
Francis 3pt percentage .354
Parker 3pt percentage .337

Francis 2pt percentage .435
Parker 2pt percentage .418

Seeing that Francis will get double teamed and Parker won't, I'd say Francis is the better shooter.

<hr /></blockquote>

Last yars stats -
Francis -
overall fg% = 43.5%
3 point % = 35.4%

Parker -
overall fg% = 46.4%
3 point % = 33.1%
 Which could mean that Francis has progressed and Parker has regressed(he's an even worst 3pt shooter last year) 
I dunno, how often would Francis have even been doubled? Very Often And regardless of stats I just think I see Parker as the better shooter, maybe I am imaging it wrong and am wrong C'mon, San Antonio played a lot of games on TV last year, how many times have your heard analysist saying that Parker needs to improve his shot. The guy can't buy a 3, he doesn't even jump when he shoots them. . Fine. I still personally prefer my choices

<hr /></blockquote>

I understand you prefer Parker, I mean, your a SA fan, they've won the championship, so why would you want to change. All I'm saying is, don't for one second believe the Spurs wouldn't dump Parker in a alley if they were given Steve Francis.

**ATrillionaire** · 10-16-2003, 02:44 AM

Re: Not a matter of IF, but WHEN the Spurs repeat!

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Admiral50 said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
ATrillionaire said:
Francis 3pt percentage .354
Parker 3pt percentage .337

Francis 2pt percentage .435
Parker 2pt percentage .418

Seeing that Francis will get double teamed and Parker won't, I'd say Francis is the better shooter.

<hr /></blockquote>

Last yars stats -
Francis -
overall fg% = 43.5%
3 point % = 35.4%

Parker -
overall fg% = 46.4%
3 point % = 33.1%
 Which could mean that Francis has progressed and Parker has regressed(he's an even worst 3pt shooter last year) 
I dunno, how often would Francis have even been doubled? Very Often And regardless of stats I just think I see Parker as the better shooter, maybe I am imaging it wrong and am wrong C'mon, San Antonio played a lot of games on TV last year, how many times have your heard analysist saying that Parker needs to improve his shot. The guy can't buy a 3, he doesn't even jump when he shoots them. . Fine. I still personally prefer my choices

<hr /></blockquote>

I understand you prefer Parker, I mean, your a SA fan, they've won the championship, so why would you want to change. All I'm saying is, don't for one second believe the Spurs wouldn't dump Parker in a alley if they were given Steve Francis.

**jordan0386** · 10-16-2003, 02:46 AM

Re: Not a matter of IF, but WHEN the Spurs repeat!

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
ATrillionaire said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Admiral50 said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
ATrillionaire said:
Francis 3pt percentage .354
Parker 3pt percentage .337

Francis 2pt percentage .435
Parker 2pt percentage .418

Seeing that Francis will get double teamed and Parker won't, I'd say Francis is the better shooter.

<hr /></blockquote>

Last yars stats -
Francis -
overall fg% = 43.5%
3 point % = 35.4%

Parker -
overall fg% = 46.4%
3 point % = 33.1%
 Which could mean that Francis has progressed and Parker has regressed(he an even worst 3pt shooter last year) 
I dunno, how often would Francis have even been doubled? Very Often And regardless of stats I just think I see Parker as the better shooter, maybe I am imaging it wrong and am wrong C'mon, San Antonio played a lot of games on TV last year, how many times have your heard analysist saying that Parker needs to improve his shot. The guy can't buy a 3, he doesn't even jump when he shoots them. . Fine. I still personally prefer my choices

<hr /></blockquote>

I understand you prefer Parker, I mean, your a SA fan, they've won the championship, so why would you want to change. All I'm saying is, don't for one second believe the Spurs wouldn't dump Parker in a alley if they given Steve Francis.

<hr /></blockquote>

...you could at least leave him a basketball

**jordan0386** · 10-16-2003, 02:46 AM

Re: Not a matter of IF, but WHEN the Spurs repeat!

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
ATrillionaire said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Admiral50 said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
ATrillionaire said:
Francis 3pt percentage .354
Parker 3pt percentage .337

Francis 2pt percentage .435
Parker 2pt percentage .418

Seeing that Francis will get double teamed and Parker won't, I'd say Francis is the better shooter.

<hr /></blockquote>

Last yars stats -
Francis -
overall fg% = 43.5%
3 point % = 35.4%

Parker -
overall fg% = 46.4%
3 point % = 33.1%
 Which could mean that Francis has progressed and Parker has regressed(he an even worst 3pt shooter last year) 
I dunno, how often would Francis have even been doubled? Very Often And regardless of stats I just think I see Parker as the better shooter, maybe I am imaging it wrong and am wrong C'mon, San Antonio played a lot of games on TV last year, how many times have your heard analysist saying that Parker needs to improve his shot. The guy can't buy a 3, he doesn't even jump when he shoots them. . Fine. I still personally prefer my choices

<hr /></blockquote>

I understand you prefer Parker, I mean, your a SA fan, they've won the championship, so why would you want to change. All I'm saying is, don't for one second believe the Spurs wouldn't dump Parker in a alley if they given Steve Francis.

<hr /></blockquote>

...you could at least leave him a basketball

**jordan0386** · 10-16-2003, 02:46 AM

Re: Not a matter of IF, but WHEN the Spurs repeat!

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
ATrillionaire said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Admiral50 said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
ATrillionaire said:
Francis 3pt percentage .354
Parker 3pt percentage .337

Francis 2pt percentage .435
Parker 2pt percentage .418

Seeing that Francis will get double teamed and Parker won't, I'd say Francis is the better shooter.

<hr /></blockquote>

Last yars stats -
Francis -
overall fg% = 43.5%
3 point % = 35.4%

Parker -
overall fg% = 46.4%
3 point % = 33.1%
 Which could mean that Francis has progressed and Parker has regressed(he an even worst 3pt shooter last year) 
I dunno, how often would Francis have even been doubled? Very Often And regardless of stats I just think I see Parker as the better shooter, maybe I am imaging it wrong and am wrong C'mon, San Antonio played a lot of games on TV last year, how many times have your heard analysist saying that Parker needs to improve his shot. The guy can't buy a 3, he doesn't even jump when he shoots them. . Fine. I still personally prefer my choices

<hr /></blockquote>

I understand you prefer Parker, I mean, your a SA fan, they've won the championship, so why would you want to change. All I'm saying is, don't for one second believe the Spurs wouldn't dump Parker in a alley if they given Steve Francis.

<hr /></blockquote>

...you could at least leave him a basketball

**SonicMage** · 10-16-2003, 02:46 AM

Re: Not a matter of IF, but WHEN the Spurs repeat!

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
ATrillionaire said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Admiral50 said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
ATrillionaire said:
Francis 3pt percentage .354
Parker 3pt percentage .337

Francis 2pt percentage .435
Parker 2pt percentage .418

Seeing that Francis will get double teamed and Parker won't, I'd say Francis is the better shooter.

<hr /></blockquote>

Last yars stats -
Francis -
overall fg% = 43.5%
3 point % = 35.4%

Parker -
overall fg% = 46.4%
3 point % = 33.1%
 Which could mean that Francis has progressed and Parker has regressed(he an even worst 3pt shooter last year) 
I dunno, how often would Francis have even been doubled? Very Often And regardless of stats I just think I see Parker as the better shooter, maybe I am imaging it wrong and am wrong C'mon, San Antonio played a lot of games on TV last year, how many times have your heard analysist saying that Parker needs to improve his shot. The guy can't buy a 3, he doesn't even jump when he shoots them. . Fine. I still personally prefer my choices

<hr /></blockquote>

I understand you prefer Parker, I mean, your a SA fan, they've won the championship, so why would you want to change. All I'm saying is, don't for one second believe the Spurs wouldn't dump Parker in a alley if they given Steve Francis.

<hr /></blockquote>

Or Jason Kidd, for that matter.

**SonicMage** · 10-16-2003, 02:46 AM

Re: Not a matter of IF, but WHEN the Spurs repeat!

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
ATrillionaire said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Admiral50 said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
ATrillionaire said:
Francis 3pt percentage .354
Parker 3pt percentage .337

Francis 2pt percentage .435
Parker 2pt percentage .418

Seeing that Francis will get double teamed and Parker won't, I'd say Francis is the better shooter.

<hr /></blockquote>

Last yars stats -
Francis -
overall fg% = 43.5%
3 point % = 35.4%

Parker -
overall fg% = 46.4%
3 point % = 33.1%
 Which could mean that Francis has progressed and Parker has regressed(he an even worst 3pt shooter last year) 
I dunno, how often would Francis have even been doubled? Very Often And regardless of stats I just think I see Parker as the better shooter, maybe I am imaging it wrong and am wrong C'mon, San Antonio played a lot of games on TV last year, how many times have your heard analysist saying that Parker needs to improve his shot. The guy can't buy a 3, he doesn't even jump when he shoots them. . Fine. I still personally prefer my choices

<hr /></blockquote>

I understand you prefer Parker, I mean, your a SA fan, they've won the championship, so why would you want to change. All I'm saying is, don't for one second believe the Spurs wouldn't dump Parker in a alley if they given Steve Francis.

<hr /></blockquote>

Or Jason Kidd, for that matter.

Not a matter of IF, but WHEN the Spurs repeat!

Recommended Videos

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment