</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
dieselboy said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
jmood88 said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
BigMike said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
dieselboy said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
jmood88 said:
Boozer is doing good but mciniss was out when they needed him the most. The cavs are worst than the nuggets. The nuggets have a better team and that's why they went to the playoffs. No team can win with only one guy.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Some teams can win with only one guy. And the Cav's have a few solid players. Boozer and Z are great, especially in the East.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
One needs only to look at the Celtics to prove Jmood's statement wrong.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
They don't only have one guy and if they do then that is one team. What team has been able to win and win consistantly with only one guy? You need role players on every team.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Now your dropping your statement to teams need "role" players?
The Jazz won without any real superstars, maybe AK-47. You could make the argument that Tim Duncan does a lot on his own. I mean, Tony Parker is a good player, but his 15-5 would probably be a lot less if the double teams weren't always on TD, and he didn't have an MVP to pass to. Paul Pierce is really all the Celts have. Davis is ok, and Blount is solid, but nothing too special.
I'm getting off topic. LBJ is the most deserving, no suprise here.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
I'm not dropping my statement to anything. A team needs good players to win, which the cavs do have buy they don't have enough good players. And my point was that lebron is the most deserving because he brought a much worse team to having a shot at the playoffs.
Comment