This is disgusting

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jordan0386
    Banned
    • May 2003
    • 9235

    #136
    Re: This is disgusting

    he was charged with Man2, i think...i think that goes along the lines of he knew what he was doing and realized someone could get hurt, but went along with it anyway...that could be man1, but i dont remember


    where is the tech. in that...the jury said he didnt do it vengefully, if im correct...so where is the tech.


    edit: he was convicted of covering it up, so its not like he just got off scott free

    Comment

    • jordan0386
      Banned
      • May 2003
      • 9235

      #137
      Re: This is disgusting

      he was charged with Man2, i think...i think that goes along the lines of he knew what he was doing and realized someone could get hurt, but went along with it anyway...that could be man1, but i dont remember


      where is the tech. in that...the jury said he didnt do it vengefully, if im correct...so where is the tech.


      edit: he was convicted of covering it up, so its not like he just got off scott free

      Comment

      • bdunn13
        GATA
        • Jul 2002
        • 4499

        #138
        Re: This is disgusting

        Originally posted by jordan0386
        he was charged with Man2, i think...i think that goes along the lines of he knew what he was doing and realized someone could get hurt, but went along with it anyway...that could be man1, but i dont remember


        where is the tech. in that...the jury said he didnt do it vengefully, if im correct...so where is the tech.
        Good lord. It had nothing to do with the technicality. I was explaining the difference between innocent and not guilty(just like you asked.. maybe you should take the time to think before you make reply posts). Obviosuly you have trouble grasping simple concepts. It had nothing to do with the technicality only a simple concept as legal finding vs fact.
        Rent this space.

        Comment

        • bdunn13
          GATA
          • Jul 2002
          • 4499

          #139
          Re: This is disgusting

          Originally posted by jordan0386
          he was charged with Man2, i think...i think that goes along the lines of he knew what he was doing and realized someone could get hurt, but went along with it anyway...that could be man1, but i dont remember


          where is the tech. in that...the jury said he didnt do it vengefully, if im correct...so where is the tech.
          Good lord. It had nothing to do with the technicality. I was explaining the difference between innocent and not guilty(just like you asked.. maybe you should take the time to think before you make reply posts). Obviosuly you have trouble grasping simple concepts. It had nothing to do with the technicality only a simple concept as legal finding vs fact.
          Rent this space.

          Comment

          • jordan0386
            Banned
            • May 2003
            • 9235

            #140
            Re: This is disgusting

            no need to get mad...its not that serious...he means nothing to either of us


            edit: looked it up, and you are correct...and relax the whole grasping knowledge aspect, i was trying to clarify something i thought i knew...when i was actually wrong...
            Last edited by jordan0386; 10-23-2004, 09:51 PM.

            Comment

            • jordan0386
              Banned
              • May 2003
              • 9235

              #141
              Re: This is disgusting

              no need to get mad...its not that serious...he means nothing to either of us


              edit: looked it up, and you are correct...and relax the whole grasping knowledge aspect, i was trying to clarify something i thought i knew...when i was actually wrong...

              Comment

              • Air23
                Banned
                • Feb 2003
                • 2502

                #142
                Re: This is disgusting

                Originally posted by asianflow
                What a suprise ......

                The NBA and Criminals/Bad Guys goes hand in hand.......

                I don't want to stir up the pot too much but it seems like in professional sports the "bad guys" are often black.
                If that ain't one of the stupidest assed things I've ever heard.

                Comment

                • Air23
                  Banned
                  • Feb 2003
                  • 2502

                  #143
                  Re: This is disgusting

                  Originally posted by asianflow
                  What a suprise ......

                  The NBA and Criminals/Bad Guys goes hand in hand.......

                  I don't want to stir up the pot too much but it seems like in professional sports the "bad guys" are often black.
                  If that ain't one of the stupidest assed things I've ever heard.

                  Comment

                  • Air23
                    Banned
                    • Feb 2003
                    • 2502

                    #144
                    Re: This is disgusting

                    Originally posted by Taur3asi3
                    I just found it on Google it said 38% of blacks live in ghetto areas compared only to 7% of whites

                    Yeah, most poor whites live in trailer parks. Poor blacks usually live in the ghettoes.

                    Comment

                    • Air23
                      Banned
                      • Feb 2003
                      • 2502

                      #145
                      Re: This is disgusting

                      Originally posted by Taur3asi3
                      I just found it on Google it said 38% of blacks live in ghetto areas compared only to 7% of whites

                      Yeah, most poor whites live in trailer parks. Poor blacks usually live in the ghettoes.

                      Comment

                      • deeman11747
                        G-M*nnnn
                        • Feb 2003
                        • 3194

                        #146
                        Re: This is disgusting

                        Originally posted by bdunn13
                        And you are 100% wrong. Not guilty is a legal term. Innocent is a factual term.

                        Evidence does not prove you innocent. It proves you not guilty. Big difference.

                        Just because someone is not guilty it does not mean they are innocent. Likewise, if someone is innocent, it does not mean they will be found not guilty.

                        May I suggest you read up on the Criminal Justice system.
                        To add to that... most times a LACK OF EVIDENCE is what gives you the label "not guilty" but in no way does it make you innocent. If you commit the perfect crime and leave nothing that can be used against you in court.. you will be not guilty due to lack of evidence. But you're not innocent because you commited the crime... you just didn't have to pay the consequences.

                        Comment

                        • deeman11747
                          G-M*nnnn
                          • Feb 2003
                          • 3194

                          #147
                          Re: This is disgusting

                          Originally posted by bdunn13
                          And you are 100% wrong. Not guilty is a legal term. Innocent is a factual term.

                          Evidence does not prove you innocent. It proves you not guilty. Big difference.

                          Just because someone is not guilty it does not mean they are innocent. Likewise, if someone is innocent, it does not mean they will be found not guilty.

                          May I suggest you read up on the Criminal Justice system.
                          To add to that... most times a LACK OF EVIDENCE is what gives you the label "not guilty" but in no way does it make you innocent. If you commit the perfect crime and leave nothing that can be used against you in court.. you will be not guilty due to lack of evidence. But you're not innocent because you commited the crime... you just didn't have to pay the consequences.

                          Comment

                          • jordan0386
                            Banned
                            • May 2003
                            • 9235

                            #148
                            Re: This is disgusting

                            Originally posted by Air23
                            Yeah, most poor whites live in trailer parks. Poor blacks usually live in the ghettoes.
                            bdunn said leave it alone...

                            Comment

                            • jordan0386
                              Banned
                              • May 2003
                              • 9235

                              #149
                              Re: This is disgusting

                              Originally posted by Air23
                              Yeah, most poor whites live in trailer parks. Poor blacks usually live in the ghettoes.
                              bdunn said leave it alone...

                              Comment

                              • Falkowski83
                                Rookie
                                • Jul 2004
                                • 128

                                #150
                                Re: This is disgusting

                                Originally posted by bdunn13
                                Good lord. It had nothing to do with the technicality. I was explaining the difference between innocent and not guilty(just like you asked.. maybe you should take the time to think before you make reply posts). Obviosuly you have trouble grasping simple concepts. It had nothing to do with the technicality only a simple concept as legal finding vs fact.

                                Well, didn't read all the previous posts, but as a law student (final year) i need to give my 2 cents.

                                I'm a law student in Brazil, the criminal system is a bit different, but the concepts do not differ. Clarifying one point: not guilty is the same of innocent. period. Don't know the details of the crime, but it could be self defense. No proofs? Innocent. It can't be prooved that you commited the crime. period. You didn't commit any crime, so you can't be found guilty or receive any sanctions by the society for that. Does that really happens? No, there is always dicrimination from the society on the person who commited a felony, or an assault aginst the life of someone.

                                In Brazil, there is not the word not-guilty. When you are considered not-guilty, the word used here is INNOCENT. In my personal opinion, it is better than your definition, so there is no discrimination on the terms nor with the person.

                                Someone brought the OJ Simpson case. BTW, I read Johnnie Cochran's book, and there is A LOT of stuff on the Simpson case. The proof he got (glove)evidently took the blame off Simpson. He could not have committed the crime. perios. What happened there was a media sensationalism that created a pre-concept on the minds of the regular people. That happens a lot everywhere.

                                Just to finish this, I'm not disrespecting anyones opinion (understand your point of view), but technically not-guilty is the SAME as innocent.
                                "There's a point to where you can drive yourself crazy venting about what a game isn't while being completely aloof to what a game is."

                                by KBomber

                                Comment

                                Working...