This is disgusting

[jordan0386]

Re: This is disgusting

somebody define corporate crime

[bdunn13]

Re: This is disgusting

wasn't he found not guilty?

Not guilty is not the same as innocent.

And the next person that tries to turn this into a racial debate gets a timeout for 3 weeks.

I will repeat. The next person that makes this racial will get a timeout for THREE WEEKS!

[bdunn13]

Re: This is disgusting

wasn't he found not guilty?

Not guilty is not the same as innocent.

And the next person that tries to turn this into a racial debate gets a timeout for 3 weeks.

I will repeat. The next person that makes this racial will get a timeout for THREE WEEKS!

[jordan0386]

Re: This is disgusting

Not guilty is not the same as innocent.

thats up to you, as an individual...but NG is basically saying the evidence here proves that you are INN.

[jordan0386]

Re: This is disgusting

Not guilty is not the same as innocent.

thats up to you, as an individual...but NG is basically saying the evidence here proves that you are INN.

[bdunn13]

Re: This is disgusting

thats up to you, as an individual...but NG is basically saying the evidence here proves that you are INN.

And you are 100% wrong. Not guilty is a legal term. Innocent is a factual term.

Evidence does not prove you innocent. It proves you not guilty. Big difference.

Just because someone is not guilty it does not mean they are innocent. Likewise, if someone is innocent, it does not mean they will be found not guilty.

May I suggest you read up on the Criminal Justice system.

[bdunn13]

Re: This is disgusting

thats up to you, as an individual...but NG is basically saying the evidence here proves that you are INN.

And you are 100% wrong. Not guilty is a legal term. Innocent is a factual term.

Evidence does not prove you innocent. It proves you not guilty. Big difference.

Just because someone is not guilty it does not mean they are innocent. Likewise, if someone is innocent, it does not mean they will be found not guilty.

May I suggest you read up on the Criminal Justice system.

[jordan0386]

Re: This is disgusting

im not seeing the difference


only maybe with OJ's case...cause a lot of people feel he is guilty


but how is your innocence not predecated on a NG verdict

[jordan0386]

Re: This is disgusting

im not seeing the difference


only maybe with OJ's case...cause a lot of people feel he is guilty


but how is your innocence not predecated on a NG verdict

[bdunn13]

Re: This is disgusting

im not seeing the difference


only maybe with OJ's case...cause a lot of people feel he is guilty


but how is your innocence not predecated on a NG verdict

If I shoot you and get off on a legal technicality I am not guilty, however I am not innocent as I commited the crime. Its pretty simple.

[bdunn13]

Re: This is disgusting

im not seeing the difference


only maybe with OJ's case...cause a lot of people feel he is guilty


but how is your innocence not predecated on a NG verdict

If I shoot you and get off on a legal technicality I am not guilty, however I am not innocent as I commited the crime. Its pretty simple.

[jordan0386]

Re: This is disgusting

thats not what he was charged with, so where is the tech.



edit: if he was charged with Mur1 or 2, then i see your point...but since he wasnt, i dont think it holds ground here

[jordan0386]

Re: This is disgusting

thats not what he was charged with, so where is the tech.



edit: if he was charged with Mur1 or 2, then i see your point...but since he wasnt, i dont think it holds ground here

[bdunn13]

Re: This is disgusting

thats not what he was charged with, so where is the tech.

Just forget it. You will never get it.

[bdunn13]

Re: This is disgusting

thats not what he was charged with, so where is the tech.

Just forget it. You will never get it.