2017 Offseason Thread

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dsallupinyaarea
    Rookie
    • Jan 2009
    • 2764

    #886
    Re: 2017 Offseason Thread

    Originally posted by phenom1990
    Yes they should try to improve their team.

    I don't see them becoming a 42 win team given the Western conference and the roster not being as good as Indiana especially if they have to make the trade. Realistically, they have to have to include draft picks to make a trade work.

    They have to attach draft picks to get rid of Deng or Mosgov in separate deals to open up cap space to get talent. They haven't demonstrated an ability to get free agents recently and unless they're getting Lebron then who are they getting?

    So I don't see the point if you're lacking draft picks and you're not luring any other free agents to play with him.

    So they should just not try and stay terrible? lol. SOMETHING has to be the first step in turning the ship around and there's no other path that'll get you a top 15 player.
    NFL - Vikings

    twitter - @dsallupinyaarea
    psn - dsallupinyaarea8
    xbox - dsallupinyoarea

    Comment

    • phenom1990
      MVP
      • Mar 2008
      • 4789

      #887
      Re: 2017 Offseason Thread

      Originally posted by dsallupinyaarea
      So they should just not try and stay terrible? lol. SOMETHING has to be the first step in turning the ship around and there's no other path that'll get you a top 15 player.
      So enjoy being capped out with no draft picks with just Paul George and Ingram? You need more than 1 All Star caliber player to compete.

      They wouldn't even be as good as the Knicks were when they traded for Carmelo. They should just wait it out for one season to get Paul George.
      "Ma'am I don't make the rules up. I just think them up and write em down". - Cartman

      2013 and 2015 OS NFL Pick'em Champ...somehow I won 2 in 3 years.

      Comment

      • ProfessaPackMan
        Bamma
        • Mar 2008
        • 63852

        #888
        Re: 2017 Offseason Thread

        The Indiana Pacers are getting out of the Paul George business. Well, more accurately, he told them he’s getting out of the Pacers business in the summer of 2018, so Indiana is now hunting around looking for trade partners to get something before he walks.

        Most of the speculation has focused on Cleveland going after him to pair with LeBron James, or the Lakers making a move to get him because he wants to come there as a free agent in 2018 anyway.

        Pacers GM Kevin Pritchard isn’t limiting himself — he’s going to talk to 29 other teams, and the one with the best offer wins. That simple. It’s all bottom line. Pritchard doesn’t care where George wants to go, stuck in a bad situation the Pacers are gong to get the best deal they can and do it quickly.

        Pacers asking teams for ideas on potential PG trades, per sources, as they have for a while. Ideally: 2 firsts+starter. Teams obv skittish.

        — David Aldridge (@daldridgetnt) June 19, 2017

        Sense from teams talking to IND is that Pacers intend to move fast on a PG deal.

        — Zach Lowe (@ZachLowe_NBA) June 19, 2017

        That best deal may not come from Cleveland or Los Angeles, there may be a team that thinks with a year in their culture they can win him over the long term and are willing to pay a little more for the opportunity — although probably not as much as the Pacers are asking.

        Still, let’s take a closer look at the two teams most rumored.

        The Lakers have little incentive to put together a deal that gives up something of value because George’s people have already let it be known he plans to go there as a free agent next summer. Why spend now?

        For those asking about PG, the Lakers have shown no inclination yet of surrendering anything for a player they can get in free agency.

        — Ramona Shelburne (@ramonashelburne) June 18, 2017

        The one reason for the Lakers to get involved — fear that George will sign somewhere like Cleveland, like it, and decide to stay. Even with that risk, the Lakers don’t want to give up much — they could try to dump one of the bad Luol Deng/Timofey Mozgov contracts, plus throw in someone they see fitting long term (such as Julius Randle), but the Lakers don’t have picks to throw around, they don’t have a tradable first rounder until 2020.

        It makes sense for Cleveland to try and get in the sweepstakes — they need an upgrade, and better play on the wings, to compete with Golden State. The Cavs are as win now as it gets and should go all in here. They may, and they have no concern about just renting George, reports Dave McMenamin of ESPN:

        The Cavs are willing to enter into trade talks for George without any assurances he will commit to a long-term deal in Cleveland, a source familiar with the Cavs’ thinking told ESPN. Cleveland is confident its championship culture and overall atmosphere could sway George to want to stay after playing out the 2017-18 season on the final year of his deal.

        The bigger question for the Cavaliers: What can they give up that Indiana wants? They don’t have young players on the bench the rebuilding Pacers want, and it’s years befoe Cleveland has picks they can send out. They also are not trading away Kyrie Irving.

        The name that comes up? Kevin Love. First off, this is not fair to Love who has worked hard and improved his game each year he has been in Cleveland — and he played hard and as well as could be expected in the Finals. The problem is, the Warriors are a beast, one that Love does not match up well against. The questions are, would the Cavs deal Love, and would Indy think Love and filler works for them? Trade George and the Pacers are in rebuilding mode, they would need to flip Love to get the kind of young player and picks needed to get on that path.

        If another team comes with a better offer, the Pacers will take it. They are trying to make the best of a terrible situation, they don’t care where the offer comes from. They may even be a little patient, but the market for a rent-a-player is never all that high.


        Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
        #RespectTheCulture

        Comment

        • Black Bruce Wayne
          MVP
          • Aug 2015
          • 1459

          #889
          Re: 2017 Offseason Thread

          I say trade for George now. People keep saying no because they don't want to lose the "young core" but the young core hasn't done anything for them.

          Why wait a year and possibly lose out on him? Yeah he said he wants to be in Los Angeles but what if he goes somewhere else and changes his mind? Why take that chance?

          Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

          Comment

          • King_B_Mack
            All Star
            • Jan 2009
            • 24450

            #890
            Re: 2017 Offseason Thread

            Originally posted by phenom1990
            So enjoy being capped out with no draft picks with just Paul George and Ingram? You need more than 1 All Star caliber player to compete.

            They wouldn't even be as good as the Knicks were when they traded for Carmelo. They should just wait it out for one season to get Paul George.


            What are you even talking about? Capped out? The Lakers are on the hook for 83 million right now before PG. The cap is 101 million next season. If all that goes from their side in a trade is say Randle and picks they're salary after the trade would be around 98.41 million next season. Without factoring in Randle's salary or whatever PG would re-up for with the Lakers, their 2018/19 salary would be as of right now 40,935,866. Even if he signed a deal that started him around 25 million that season that's still only 65 million dollars in salaries for a year that the cap is more than likely going to be about 104 million.


            Sent from my iPhone using Operation Sports

            Comment

            • ehh
              Hall Of Fame
              • Mar 2003
              • 28959

              #891
              Re: 2017 Offseason Thread

              Originally posted by Black Bruce Wayne
              I say trade for George now. People keep saying no because they don't want to lose the "young core" but the young core hasn't done anything for them.

              Why wait a year and possibly lose out on him? Yeah he said he wants to be in Los Angeles but what if he goes somewhere else and changes his mind? Why take that chance?
              Just don't let it turn into the Melo trade all over again. Paul George and a bunch of garbage isn't going to do much for you.
              "You make your name in the regular season, and your fame in the postseason." - Clyde Frazier

              "Beware of geeks bearing formulas." - Warren Buffet

              Comment

              • ojandpizza
                Hall Of Fame
                • Apr 2011
                • 29807

                #892
                Re: 2017 Offseason Thread

                If Indy wants to trade PG to Cleveland on a rental they're going to have to be able to take a Thompson+Shump trade or something. Swapping Love for PG doesn't make Cleveland any better, and they aren't trading that asset for a 1 year rental. Surely not.


                Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                Comment

                • Vni
                  Hall Of Fame
                  • Sep 2011
                  • 14833

                  #893
                  Re: 2017 Offseason Thread

                  George could still leave in FA next summer the same way he could decide to stay in Cleveland or wherever if he ends up getting traded there.

                  Lakers are on the record saying they aren't trading any of the young core for him and I tottally respect that. Now if they can work up a deal involving Clarkson or even Randle I'd be ok too.

                  Comment

                  • ojandpizza
                    Hall Of Fame
                    • Apr 2011
                    • 29807

                    #894
                    Re: 2017 Offseason Thread

                    If the Lakers want George they absolutely need to trade for him now. If a contender lands him he can keep signing these 1+1 year type of deals and stick around for a few seasons and still end up in LAL whenever he decides he wants to. But if he gets on a contender and is competing for championships I guarantee he sticks around for longer than just 1 season.


                    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                    Comment

                    • cabra1
                      MVP
                      • Dec 2013
                      • 1055

                      #895
                      Re: 2017 Offseason Thread

                      Could Toronto possibly put something together for him?


                      Sent from my iPhone using Operation Sports

                      Comment

                      • Vni
                        Hall Of Fame
                        • Sep 2011
                        • 14833

                        #896
                        Re: 2017 Offseason Thread

                        Originally posted by ojandpizza
                        If the Lakers want George they absolutely need to trade for him now. If a contender lands him he can keep signing these 1+1 year type of deals and stick around for a few seasons and still end up in LAL whenever he decides he wants to. But if he gets on a contender and is competing for championships I guarantee he sticks around for longer than just 1 season.


                        Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
                        What difference does it make though ? You're still only trading for a one year rental. Whose to say George is staying in LA after winning 35 games when he's going to get offers from legit contenders ?

                        Comment

                        • dsallupinyaarea
                          Rookie
                          • Jan 2009
                          • 2764

                          #897
                          Re: 2017 Offseason Thread

                          Originally posted by phenom1990
                          So enjoy being capped out with no draft picks with just Paul George and Ingram? You need more than 1 All Star caliber player to compete.

                          They wouldn't even be as good as the Knicks were when they traded for Carmelo. They should just wait it out for one season to get Paul George.

                          If you can guarantee he's coming in a year, sure. You can't do that though so by waiting you're adding a ton of variables to the situation. He could go to the Cavs, decide he likes playing with Bron and for chips and stay. Indy could refuse to trade him, he could make All NBA next year and decide that he'd rather take the DPE deal that's worth about 70ms more. He could go to Boston and, rightfully, come to the conclusion that their future is brighter and decide to stay. These are just the foreseeable things that could happen. Stuff could happen that we haven't even thought of yet.
                          NFL - Vikings

                          twitter - @dsallupinyaarea
                          psn - dsallupinyaarea8
                          xbox - dsallupinyoarea

                          Comment

                          • ProfessaPackMan
                            Bamma
                            • Mar 2008
                            • 63852

                            #898
                            Re: 2017 Offseason Thread

                            Originally posted by ehh
                            Just don't let it turn into the Melo trade all over again. Paul George and a bunch of garbage isn't going to do much for you.
                            Especially when you got that monster in Northern Cali, which isn't going anywhere no time soon.
                            #RespectTheCulture

                            Comment

                            • dsallupinyaarea
                              Rookie
                              • Jan 2009
                              • 2764

                              #899
                              Re: 2017 Offseason Thread

                              Originally posted by ehh
                              Just don't let it turn into the Melo trade all over again. Paul George and a bunch of garbage isn't going to do much for you.


                              In hindsight, the Melo trade, in and of itself, wasn't that bad. It gets painted with a broad brush because a)the Nuggets won 57 games the next season and b) the Knicks subsequent moves were all terrible.


                              Mosgov
                              Gallinari
                              Raymond Felton
                              Wilson Chandler
                              the pick that eventually turned into Dario Saric


                              That hasn't exactly been the core of any championship contenders the past 6 years.
                              NFL - Vikings

                              twitter - @dsallupinyaarea
                              psn - dsallupinyaarea8
                              xbox - dsallupinyoarea

                              Comment

                              • ProfessaPackMan
                                Bamma
                                • Mar 2008
                                • 63852

                                #900
                                Re: 2017 Offseason Thread

                                Originally posted by dsallupinyaarea
                                In hindsight, the Melo trade, in and of itself, wasn't that bad. It gets painted with a broad brush because a)the Nuggets won 57 games the next season and b) the Knicks subsequent moves were all terrible.


                                Mosgov
                                Gallinari
                                Raymond Felton
                                Wilson Chandler
                                the pick that eventually turned into Dario Saric


                                That hasn't exactly been the core of any championship contenders the past 6 years.
                                Just imagine how much of a better team the Knicks would've had if they kept that, along with their draft pick and still signed Melo in the Offseason.
                                #RespectTheCulture

                                Comment

                                Working...