Thats not really a significant difference in pricing. If someone has a problem paying 600 bucks for a lower level close to the octogon seat, they probably will have a problem paying 450. The UFC always has trouble selling those seats no matter where they are (same issue in Philly) because the seats offer poor viewing of the fight and are the most expensive fight. With the other prices we are looking at a difference of 50 bucks per ticket which isnt much. Especially for an event that comes to your town every few years...if you are lucky. This isnt like going to a Blazers game.
The average card argument doesnt work that well either. Correct me if I'm wrong but UFC 78 fits this same situation. Average card (actually worse than UFC 102 with Bisping/Evans as the headliner) and a first time event in an new area (New Jersey). UFC 78 still had a bigger gate than 102. I'm not saying that the prices didnt hurt the chance of a sellout but the fact that the event only sold 10,000 tickets (in a 16-17k arena) and that the UFC had to paper the event in order to make it look packed isnt a good thing for future events there.
Comment