Raw 1/27/14: If you quit watching for awhile, I wouldn't blame you.

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ondreythegiant
    Rookie
    • Sep 2010
    • 284

    #16
    Re: Raw 1/27/14: If you quit watching for awhile, I wouldn't blame you.



    I was in Cleveland the last time it was there. They won't disappoint.

    Originally posted by OSUFan_88
    While I would like to have confidence in the city of Cleveland to do what's right, historically the WWE crowd in Cleveland isn't always the best. And by that I mean "if it's not Cena, it's not getting cheered" so we'll see.
    Youtube- www.youtube.com/OndreyTheGiant20

    Subscribe and follow!

    Comment

    • Mercury112491
      All Star
      • Mar 2007
      • 7426

      #17
      Re: Raw 1/27/14: If you quit watching for awhile, I wouldn't blame you.

      Lol the level of over reaction tonight is spectacular

      Comment

      • ubernoob
        ****
        • Jul 2004
        • 15522

        #18
        Re: Raw 1/27/14: If you quit watching for awhile, I wouldn't blame you.

        Originally posted by Mercury112491
        Lol the level of over reaction tonight is spectacular
        Who's overreacting?

        If anything this is the longest delayed reaction I can think of in a long time.
        bad

        Comment

        • TheMatrix31
          RF
          • Jul 2002
          • 52918

          #19
          Re: Raw 1/27/14: If you quit watching for awhile, I wouldn't blame you.

          Whoever isn't happy and is just going to constantly bitch post-in, post-out should just follow through on their threats, stop watching the product and save us the trouble.

          Comment

          • SoundTheAlarm
            Rookie
            • Dec 2004
            • 1541

            #20
            Re: Raw 1/27/14: If you quit watching for awhile, I wouldn't blame you.

            Even though I am (as with everyone else) disappointed with the ending to the royal rumble.... I WILL be at the RAW in Cleveland tonight enjoying myself as I always do with WWE events. This will be my first ever Raw, so I'm excited.

            No worries though, OSers. I'll be sure to crap all over Batista for ya.


            Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

            Comment

            • BunnyHardaway
              Banned
              • Nov 2004
              • 15195

              #21
              Re: Raw 1/27/14: If you quit watching for awhile, I wouldn't blame you.

              Watching solely to see the crowd (hopefully) **** on the entire show.

              Comment

              • ProfessaPackMan
                Bamma
                • Mar 2008
                • 63852

                #22
                Re: Raw 1/27/14: If you quit watching for awhile, I wouldn't blame you.

                As awful as the ending was last night, we were all still going to watch Raw regardless of the result.
                #RespectTheCulture

                Comment

                • Kearnzo
                  Banned
                  • Jul 2002
                  • 5963

                  #23
                  Re: Raw 1/27/14: If you quit watching for awhile, I wouldn't blame you.

                  Originally posted by ProfessaPackMan
                  As awful as the ending was last night, we were all still going to watch Raw regardless of the result.
                  Yeah, it makes me want to watch RAW even more. I'm fairly positive that they have no clue what they are doing, but at the off chance they are playing us like a fiddle, I'd like to see it.

                  Does that mean my hopes are high heading into Mania? Not a chance. But I can dream.

                  Comment

                  • Ice_Cold345
                    MVP
                    • Nov 2012
                    • 2109

                    #24
                    Re: Raw 1/27/14: If you quit watching for awhile, I wouldn't blame you.

                    I'm really only watching RAW for one reason and that is to see the fans reaction. I want to see what they do, if what people mentioned on reddit actually happened (turned their backs on anything WWE that isn't Bryan or Punk[unless with the Authority]{I would include AJ on that list}), I would mark the hell out. Boo'ing Batista is the wrong way to approach it, because they are going to push him like a heel, so if you give no reaction, that's incredibly way worse, let alone turning your back on the action.

                    It really seems that the company doesn't know what they are doing, it also doesn't help with all the HHH guys were relevant at the Rumble(NAO, Orton, Batista, Nash.)

                    This is the time that I wish TNA was actually garbage, so that there was something else to watch.

                    I want this to be a work so hard with the Foley stuff and everybody else in the company and used to be in the company trashing it, I would be incredibly happy and give mad props to HHH. But I have many of doubts that's it's not.
                    Last edited by Ice_Cold345; 01-27-2014, 10:11 AM.
                    NFL: Houston Texans / Carolina Panthers
                    NBA: Indiana Pacers
                    MLB: Cleveland Indians
                    NCAA: Purdue Boilermakers
                    NASCAR: Ryan Newman

                    One day, Purdue Men's Basketball and Football will become relevant again.

                    Comment

                    • Thrash13
                      MVP
                      • May 2005
                      • 1133

                      #25
                      Re: Raw 1/27/14: If you quit watching for awhile, I wouldn't blame you.

                      I'm still holding out hope that they end up making Daniel Bryan look even stronger after last night's debacle. He lost cleanly to Bray Wyatt and wasn't even in the Rumble. I have my doubts, but here's to hoping they listen for once for crying out loud.

                      I was one of the many who thought it was too early to have Roman Reigns win the Rumble match and challenge for the title at Wrestlemania, but last night was one of those nights the WWE should've gone with the smart move and had him win over Batista. I was holding out hope for a CM Punk win even though I knew it wouldn't happen. But once it was down to the final three, the officials should've gone with the crowd response for once. A heel Batista vs. a heel Orton at WM does nothing for anyone other than maybe HHH and Vince. LOL. The WWE Universe took a dump on their plans, and I think it's great. It definitely has them dumbfounded.

                      Like someone else mentioned, I'm looking forward to RAW even more after last night. It's going to be volatile, lol.

                      Comment

                      • Marino
                        Moderator
                        • Jan 2008
                        • 18113

                        #26
                        Re: Raw 1/27/14: If you quit watching for awhile, I wouldn't blame you.

                        Originally posted by ProfessaPackMan
                        As awful as the ending was last night, we were all still going to watch Raw regardless of the result.
                        Not when the fiance is recording the Bachelor on the main tv.

                        Comment

                        • Mr2Nice
                          # The No Movement!
                          • Mar 2012
                          • 1262

                          #27
                          Re: Raw 1/27/14: If you quit watching for awhile, I wouldn't blame you.

                          I'm not sure why people are freaking out over Bryan not being in or winning the rumble. Orginals plans were he'd still be in the Wyatts right now. He's coming off a concussion. It's the smart thing not to have him do double duty last night. He's going to win the WWE title at some point and probably hold it for 4 months so just calm down lol.

                          Now as for Batista winning the rumble that was almost a given. He was suppose to be a major surprise, it got out and etc. Now does Batista deserve it heck no! If I were on the roster I'd be upset with HHH and the rest of the team.

                          As for watching, heck yeah I'm still goin watch. I found it very very interesting that Nash seemed to focus on the Shield. We got other surprise people that should start poppin up anytime. Will Taker show? all interesting things more interesting than TLC.

                          Comment

                          • eremiomania
                            Rookie
                            • Mar 2011
                            • 935

                            #28
                            Re: Raw 1/27/14: If you quit watching for awhile, I wouldn't blame you.

                            I missed the last Raw in Cleveland, but was at the previous 2. I was going to buy some cheap seats today if the Rumble talked me into it. We know how that ended up. I hope Cleveland makes a scene of it. I just don't get it. I just don't get it.

                            In other news, The Shield is supposed to be on our local radio in a bit. Not sure how that's gonna go lol.
                            These days I'm less like "Jailhouse Rock" Elvis and more like "dying alone on the toilet" Elvis.

                            Comment

                            • aholbert32
                              (aka Alberto)
                              • Jul 2002
                              • 33106

                              #29
                              Re: Raw 1/27/14: If you quit watching for awhile, I wouldn't blame you.

                              Here is what I dont get: Everybody loves Bryan. The hardcore fans love him because of his in ring skills. The casuals love the "Yes!" chant. Everybody is upset that Bryan wasnt in and didnt win the Rumble.

                              But the two PPVs he headlined drew significantly less PPV buys than expected.

                              And thats all that matters to Triple H, Vince and the shareholders. They arent risktakers. They arent going to risk having Wrestlemania's buyrate come in low by having Bryan headline WM because for some reason Bryan isnt a ppv draw.

                              So thats why I'm not that upset about Bryan not being in the Rumble. They never had any plans for him to win it so why get peoples hopes up?

                              Comment

                              • Ice_Cold345
                                MVP
                                • Nov 2012
                                • 2109

                                #30
                                Re: Raw 1/27/14: If you quit watching for awhile, I wouldn't blame you.

                                Originally posted by Mr2Nice
                                I'm not sure why people are freaking out over Bryan not being in or winning the rumble. Orginals plans were he'd still be in the Wyatts right now. He's coming off a concussion. It's the smart thing not to have him do double duty last night. He's going to win the WWE title at some point and probably hold it for 4 months so just calm down lol.

                                Now as for Batista winning the rumble that was almost a given. He was suppose to be a major surprise, it got out and etc. Now does Batista deserve it heck no! If I were on the roster I'd be upset with HHH and the rest of the team.

                                As for watching, heck yeah I'm still goin watch. I found it very very interesting that Nash seemed to focus on the Shield. We got another surprise people that should start poppin up anytime. Will Taker show? all interesting things more interesting than TLC.
                                They could have easily worked around the concussion for Bryan to be in. Why would he have a 20 minute match if he had a concussion? They could have had him come in the Rumble at #30, and only seven or so guys left in the Rumble. Have Reigns do his things, and be left with Bryan, Batista, Sheamus, and Reigns. Have it come down to Bryan and Batista and have Bryan out think Batista and have him run over the top rope / knee'd over the top rope for the win. It was easily possible to put him in and not have him be at super risk, but they took the uber conservative route.

                                Originally posted by aholbert32
                                Here is what I dont get: Everybody loves Bryan. The hardcore fans love him because of his in ring skills. The casuals love the "Yes!" chant. Everybody is upset that Bryan wasnt in and didnt win the Rumble.

                                But the two PPVs he headlined drew significantly less PPV buys than expected.

                                And thats all that matters to Triple H, Vince and the shareholders. They arent risktakers. They arent going to risk having Wrestlemania's buyrate come in low by having Bryan headline WM because for some reason Bryan isnt a ppv draw.

                                So thats why I'm not that upset about Bryan not being in the Rumble. They never had any plans for him to win it so why get peoples hopes up?
                                Ironically, when they took a risk, it was the best time in WWE history, with that being the Attitude Era.

                                One man doesn't make a PPV alone, you have to an entire decent card built around him. It's like football. One man doesn't make a team, it takes a group of quality individuals to carry that team to a Super Bowl.
                                Last edited by Ice_Cold345; 01-27-2014, 10:32 AM.
                                NFL: Houston Texans / Carolina Panthers
                                NBA: Indiana Pacers
                                MLB: Cleveland Indians
                                NCAA: Purdue Boilermakers
                                NASCAR: Ryan Newman

                                One day, Purdue Men's Basketball and Football will become relevant again.

                                Comment

                                Working...