Madden 16 CFM Draft: Biggest Freaks/Studs/Gems in

[Nuke LaLoosh]

Re: Madden 16 CFM Draft: Biggest Freaks/Studs/Gems in

Not a fan of how you quote me then talk about how people go over the top to simulate real football.

I'm not changing WR to HB because I think it's a cheap tactic, not because it isn't sim. If you want to, go ahead. Play the game as you see fit. If you get more enjoyment by making the change then go for it man.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You can not be a fan of being quoted, I'm ok with that.

I'm given an opportunity every season, before it starts, to switch player's positions. Every year I move o-line men around. Under sized tackles to guards, guards to centers, Tall 300lbs+ ends to DTs, OLB to safety,TE to FB, etc. Can you name any 5'10" 221lbs WRs? I can't really think of any. Because in my next draft class there is one. That goes back to what I've said in a couple threads, if I find a fast WR with a RB build, I'll move him. I don't find it to be exploiting the game since the cpu has advantages during the draft that I don't necessarily have and every RB the cpu generates is a plodder. Even the "speed backs" aren't really speed backs in this game. It could/should be something they could fix with a patch, like the patched the slow safeties in this game.

[Maelstrom-XIII]

Re: Madden 16 CFM Draft: Biggest Freaks/Studs/Gems in

Demetrius Goodley or something along those lines (in FA) is 5'10", 220. Think he only has 89 speed though.

[beekay415]

Re: Madden 16 CFM Draft: Biggest Freaks/Studs/Gems in

Demetrius Goodley or something along those lines (in FA) is 5'10", 220. Think he only has 89 speed though.

Antwan Goodley, hes got 91 speed. i usually sign him in all my franchises, plays really good

[Nuke LaLoosh]

Re: Madden 16 CFM Draft: Biggest Freaks/Studs/Gems in

Listed at 5'10" 209lbs on his NFL.com draft profile.

[beekay415]

Re: Madden 16 CFM Draft: Biggest Freaks/Studs/Gems in

Listed at 5'10" 209lbs on his NFL.com draft profile.

yeah hes 5"11 220 in the game must be with cleats and pads on haha

[NDAlum]

Re: Madden 16 CFM Draft: Biggest Freaks/Studs/Gems in

You can not be a fan of being quoted, I'm ok with that.

I'm given an opportunity every season, before it starts, to switch player's positions. Every year I move o-line men around. Under sized tackles to guards, guards to centers, Tall 300lbs+ ends to DTs, OLB to safety,TE to FB, etc. Can you name any 5'10" 221lbs WRs? I can't really think of any. Because in my next draft class there is one. That goes back to what I've said in a couple threads, if I find a fast WR with a RB build, I'll move him. I don't find it to be exploiting the game since the cpu has advantages during the draft that I don't necessarily have and every RB the cpu generates is a plodder. Even the "speed backs" aren't really speed backs in this game. It could/should be something they could fix with a patch, like the patched the slow safeties in this game.

It's 100% exploiting the game


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Nuke LaLoosh]

Re: Madden 16 CFM Draft: Biggest Freaks/Studs/Gems in

It's 100% exploiting the game


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Whatever makes you feel better.

[scoobyskyline3]

Re: Madden 16 CFM Draft: Biggest Freaks/Studs/Gems in

It's 100% exploiting the game


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I side with the contrary, The MADDEN draft has many 4th round and earlier RBs every season that are under 180lbs and arent that fast. Also, there is not always a good player to switch from WR to RB with high speed.

Furthermore, as the commish of my league how would you prevent people from doing what is logical in the build of this game?

100% exploiting the game would be drafting ANY cb's by definition, when is the last time youve seen multiple cornerbacks that are sub 4.4 40 yard dashes and stronger than the lion share of linebackers and 4-3 defensive ends in the draft?

[NDAlum]

Re: Madden 16 CFM Draft: Biggest Freaks/Studs/Gems in

Whatever makes you feel better.

I'm not the person who exploits so the game so I feel just fine.

I side with the contrary, The MADDEN draft has many 4th round and earlier RBs every season that are under 180lbs and arent that fast. Also, there is not always a good player to switch from WR to RB with high speed.

Furthermore, as the commish of my league how would you prevent people from doing what is logical in the build of this game?

100% exploiting the game would be drafting ANY cb's by definition, when is the last time youve seen multiple cornerbacks that are sub 4.4 40 yard dashes and stronger than the lion share of linebackers and 4-3 defensive ends in the draft?

It's your game, do what you want. We don't allow WR -> HB position changes in our online CFM. The draft classes aren't perfect, I agree.

There are many ways to exploit the game. If you choose to do them, fine.

[beekay415]

Re: Madden 16 CFM Draft: Biggest Freaks/Studs/Gems in

I'm not the person who exploits so the game so I feel just fine.







It's your game, do what you want. We don't allow WR -> HB position changes in our online CFM. The draft classes aren't perfect, I agree.



There are many ways to exploit the game. If you choose to do them, fine.

I feel like if your online cfm has rules, awesome. If your playing a solo cfm, do what you want it's your game, you paid for it. Enjoy it how you see fit!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Robo COP]

Re: Madden 16 CFM Draft: Biggest Freaks/Studs/Gems in

I feel like if your online cfm has rules, awesome. If your playing a solo cfm, do what you want it's your game, you paid for it. Enjoy it how you see fit!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I agree with this, but it is still exploiting an inefficiency in the game. It's exploiting a feature you know you will gain a HUGE benefit for while the CPUs you are playing against will NEVER move a guy from WR to RB on their own. NEVER.

As ND already said, do whatever you want in your offline CFMs, it makes no difference to me. In NCAA football you could edit rosters and make every player a 99 in every attribute on your team. You can do that, fine by me. But just because the game allows you to do it doesn't mean it's not exploiting the game to give yourself a competitive advantage over the CPU

[beekay415]

Re: Madden 16 CFM Draft: Biggest Freaks/Studs/Gems in

I agree with this, but it is still exploiting an inefficiency in the game. It's exploiting a feature you know you will gain a HUGE benefit for while the CPUs you are playing against will NEVER move a guy from WR to RB on their own. NEVER.

As ND already said, do whatever you want in your offline CFMs, it makes no difference to me. In NCAA football you could edit rosters and make every player a 99 in every attribute on your team. You can do that, fine by me. But just because the game allows you to do it doesn't mean it's not exploiting the game to give yourself a competitive advantage over the CPU

agree, i dont personally do it, but thats not saying i wouldnt. if i was getting bored with cfm or found an interesting prospect i wanted to create a storyline for, ya know.

percy harvin at florida linedup and RB and WR altho listed as a WR, it even says it in his draft profile, teams might project him at either.

http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/...arvin?id=80425

[scoobyskyline3]

Re: Madden 16 CFM Draft: Biggest Freaks/Studs/Gems in

I'm not the person who exploits so the game so I feel just fine.



It's your game, do what you want. We don't allow WR -> HB position changes in our online CFM. The draft classes aren't perfect, I agree.

There are many ways to exploit the game. If you choose to do them, fine.

We havent vetoed that in our online league, but its no different from taking a corner and leaving him there with 80+ strength (kinda cheese) or turning him to a FS. Honestly its stupid that its like this because the only way to play a realistic way is by basically avoiding the draft. All the 3'4 DEs are big but still fast with DT strength even in the 3rd and 4th round.

Asking for a patch would be asking 12 people with worklives to restart their league yet again

[Nuke LaLoosh]

Re: Madden 16 CFM Draft: Biggest Freaks/Studs/Gems in

I'm not the person who exploits so the game so I feel just fine.



It's your game, do what you want. We don't allow WR -> HB position changes in our online CFM. The draft classes aren't perfect, I agree.

There are many ways to exploit the game. If you choose to do them, fine.

No, you don't otherwise you wouldn't be bitching about it.

"We don't allow WR -> HB position changes in our online CFM". Nice realism there. Telling other franchise owners what they can and can't do with their rosters.

This isn't your first madden right? You do realize that ALL the previous maddens had burners at the RB position of all sizes, right? So because the developers ADMITTEDLY screw up the draft classes with slow safeties (which they fixed) and have over looked the fact that every RB has full back speed, it's an "exploitation" to correct the problem?

It's also completely realistic for guys to get faster the longer they've been in the league, right? Or do you ban that in your franchises too? No increasing the speed of RBs in your connected franchises?

Sounds awesome.

[jb12780]

Re: Madden 16 CFM Draft: Biggest Freaks/Studs/Gems in

No, you don't otherwise you wouldn't be bitching about it.

"We don't allow WR -> HB position changes in our online CFM". Nice realism there. Telling other franchise owners what they can and can't do with their rosters.

This isn't your first madden right? You do realize that ALL the previous maddens had burners at the RB position of all sizes, right? So because the developers ADMITTEDLY screw up the draft classes with slow safeties (which they fixed) and have over looked the fact that every RB has full back speed, it's an "exploitation" to correct the problem?

It's also completely realistic for guys to get faster the longer they've been in the league, right? Or do you ban that in your franchises too? No increasing the speed of RBs in your connected franchises?

Sounds awesome.

Turning a fast WR->RB isn't strategy. It's exploiting the game.

The 32 owners in said league are happy with the rules.



Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk