NFL Off Topic

[Hassan Darkside]

Re: NFL Off Topic

Welp.

[Madden08PCgmr]

Re: NFL Off Topic

Okay, lets cut the guy some slack.

Our Home Depot should be declared a disaster area. If his is anything like mine, I am willing to say this was justifiable.

[mestevo]

Re: NFL Off Topic

Welp.

Even their logo looks pissed.

[p_rushing]

Re: NFL Off Topic

Several of Deshaun Watson's accusers are outed as liars about several things, via pro sports daily.

It was per Watson's lawyer and their response. They claim they have some witnesses and say 1 of them wanted money but it was consensual.

At this point it's all still he said, she said. We don't have proof either way other than Watson getting a ton of massages from different women. His lawyer really needs to be careful because he is still hurting Watson saying he looks for women on Instagram to get a massage and then asks for extra. The NFL won't like that.

I'm sure some of them are embellishing it but it's going to be hard to prove either way, which is why the pattern matters.

Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk

[ggsimmonds]

Re: NFL Off Topic

I, admittedly read you better, now. I'm too literal most times. Overall, trust me, I'm saying that I don't believe all the facts are 100% out there compared to the speculative being shoved at us (the usual, of course). Case in point: Look how fast people out there were ready to crucify A. Donald just this morning. The actual facts weren't even there, but people sure did say it was facts and ran with it. What's presented as facts this very minute might up and change, still, too. I always say that so many people are quick to jump to conclusions, but then they often find out what they jumped to was off-a-cliff. I'm always therefore slowing said roll. That's why what I'm talking about is facts from the very beginning of Deshaun's ordeal, and I say facts because both sides confirmed it. Those facts equaled my thinking it sketchy. We're all still learning, me especially, of course. No arrogance meant from me. I love the real talk in these forums, so I don't want anyone thinking I'm a troll or whatever.

Several of Deshaun Watson's accusers are outed as liars about several things, via pro sports daily.

Well so much for that

[LambertandHam]

Re: NFL Off Topic

Steelers sign Tomlin to a three year extension. Rotoworld mentioned he needs five more wins to pass Cowher.

[ggsimmonds]

Re: NFL Off Topic

Thought I had while driving home from work the other day, what are the chances that in his defense against these civil suits Watson opens himself up to criminal solicitation and trafficking laws?

I was simply posting what the headlines said and/or alluded to. I'm not claiming it as facts or that I believe it. The yahoo article words it the same way.

https://sports.yahoo.com/deshaun-wat...222545020.html

It doesn't actually.

[illwill10]

Re: NFL Off Topic

Rule changes

[TheShizNo1]

Re: NFL Off Topic

I don't understand number 2?

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

[kehlis]

Re: NFL Off Topic

I don't understand number 2?

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

I think it has something to do with how they can line up on kickoffs.

Saw something that there was a change that would make it slightly easier for onside kicks.

[reyes the roof]

Re: NFL Off Topic

I don't understand number 2?

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

Now the receiving team can only have nine guys lined up in the area 10-25 yards away from the ball

[IlluminatusUIUC]

Re: NFL Off Topic

Here is my onside kick rule change: the kicker can line up anywhere he wants on the 35 yard line, not just inside the hashes. That forces the receiving team to guard the width of the field rather than half of it and would have fewer people crashing into the scrum.

[steelerfan]

Re: NFL Off Topic

I'm not positive this hasn't been added in the last few seasons so correct me if it has.

I've never understood why the NFL has refused to allow the defensive team to score 2 points on returns on PAT and 2-point conversion attempts. It is literally the only type of play in which only one team can possibly score.

I know it would be super rare, as it is in college, but why have any specific play type in which only one team can possibly score points? Dumb.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk

[IlluminatusUIUC]

Re: NFL Off Topic

I'm not positive this hasn't been added in the last few seasons so correct me if it has.

I've never understood why the NFL has refused to allow the defensive team to score 2 points on returns on PAT and 2-point conversion attempts. It is literally the only type of play in which only one team can possibly score.

I know it would be super rare, as it is in college, but why have any specific play type in which only one team can possibly score points? Dumb.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk

They fixed that rule years ago, it famously decided a Chiefs Falcons game in 2016 (https://www.businessinsider.com/chie...istory-2016-12)

After the Hail Murray this year, the Cardinals knelt on the football specifically to prevent the Bills from having a chance to run it back.

[steelerfan]

Re: NFL Off Topic

They fixed that rule years ago, it famously decided a Chiefs Falcons game in 2016 (https://www.businessinsider.com/chie...istory-2016-12)



After the Hail Murray this year, the Cardinals knelt on the football specifically to prevent the Bills from having a chance to run it back.

Thank you. I couldn't remember that they had changed it but I'm glad they did!

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk