NFL Off Topic

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • rangerrick012
    All Star
    • Jan 2010
    • 6201

    #10321
    Re: NFL Off Topic

    Originally posted by wwharton
    There wasn't, and they were both initially charged so whatever information the police had that we don't know seems to indicate they were both in the wrong.

    Obviously, being a man (and a professional football player at that) makes him infinitely more wrong, but the idea that the league should trump law enforcement (in EVERY case, not just this one) always blows me with the comments around here. I did expect him to get a larger suspension, but I'm not really shocked that he didn't either. We don't have enough information to say... all we know is that he wasn't charged.
    Well if the league didn't set precedent by suspending guys that were never prosecuted, I.e. big Ben and Pac man, then people wouldn't be so critical. Since its never been clearly laid out what is or isn't against the "personal conduct"policy either, at least to my knowledge.
    Twitter: @rangerrick012

    PSN: dsavbeast

    Comment

    • rangerrick012
      All Star
      • Jan 2010
      • 6201

      #10322
      Re: NFL Off Topic

      Originally posted by bigbob
      Show me where he punched her.

      Don't worry.

      I'll wait.
      OK I'm sorry, he just slapped her unconscious. No biggie.



      Slap your wife. 2 games. Slap on the wrist. Seems legit.
      Twitter: @rangerrick012

      PSN: dsavbeast

      Comment

      • kehlis
        Moderator
        • Jul 2008
        • 27738

        #10323
        Re: NFL Off Topic

        Originally posted by bigbob
        Show me where he punched her.

        Don't worry.

        I'll wait.
        I don't remember all the details but was there any actual evidence that Ben sexually assaulted that girl?

        I don't think your point is a fair one if not.
        Last edited by kehlis; 07-24-2014, 06:27 PM.

        Comment

        • gopher_guy
          The Kaptain
          • Jul 2011
          • 7389

          #10324
          Re: NFL Off Topic

          Originally posted by bigbob
          Show me where he punched her.

          Don't worry.

          I'll wait.
          I have to assume you're just arguing to argue?

          I mean, everyone on the planet knows what happened in that elevator.

          Man and woman walk into elevator alone. Woman comes out unconscious. Thanks to our friend "circumstantial evidence", we can pretty easily deduce that there is only one logical outcome.

          If there was some freak accident, like her forgetting how to stand, and banging her head on the wall or something, Ray Rice and the Ravens would have come right out in front of it with that story. And if that happened, I'm sure all of our first reaction would be to grab her hair and pull her out of the elevator.....
          University of Minnesota Golden Gopher Hockey
          Minnesota's Pride on Ice: 1974, 1976, 1979, 2002 & 2003 NCAA National Champions

          "The name on the front of the jersey is a hell of a lot more important than the one on the back."
          -Herb Brooks

          Comment

          • Sgt_Carnage
            Banned
            • Feb 2014
            • 949

            #10325
            Re: NFL Off Topic

            Originally posted by bigbob
            Where did he "beat the piss" out of his wife? The only video we've seen shows him pulling her out of an elevator where they're both drunk.

            If you want to jump to conclusions, sure. Suspend him for a year since we don't know what really happened in the elevator.

            Makes total sense.
            Yeah, I'm sure she just fell and hit her head in that elevator.

            Comment

            • mestevo
              Gooney Goo Goo
              • Apr 2010
              • 19556

              #10326
              Re: NFL Off Topic

              Just because the legal system doesn't believe they can convict someone for a crime doesn't mean something improper didn't happen or that what they did suddenly becomes immune to scrutiny under other things they've agreed to, namely the Personal Conduct Policy in these incidents.

              Via: http://espn.go.com/blog/nflnation/po...conduct-policy

              Criminal offenses including, but not limited to, those involving:
              • The use or threat of violence; domestic violence and other forms of partner abuse; theft and other property crimes; sex offenses; obstruction or resisting arrest; disorderly conduct; fraud; racketeering; and money laundering;
              • Criminal offenses relating to steroids and prohibited substances, or substances of abuse;
              • Violent or threatening behavior among employees, whether in or outside the workplace;
              • Possession of a gun or other weapon in any workplace setting, including but not limited to stadiums, team facilities, training camp, locker rooms, team planes,
              • buses, parking lots, etc., or unlawful possession of a weapon outside of the workplace;
              • Conduct that imposes inherent danger to the safety and well being of another person; and
              • Conduct that undermines or puts at risk the integrity and reputation of the NFL, NFL clubs, or NFL players.


              Much lower bar than 'beyond a reasonable doubt' a criminal investigation typically requires.

              Comment

              • wwharton
                *ll St*r
                • Aug 2002
                • 26949

                #10327
                Re: NFL Off Topic

                Originally posted by rangerrick012
                Well if the league didn't set precedent by suspending guys that were never prosecuted, I.e. big Ben and Pac man, then people wouldn't be so critical. Since its never been clearly laid out what is or isn't against the "personal conduct"policy either, at least to my knowledge.
                I have no problem with Rice being suspended... correction, I AGREE with Rice being suspended. I just said two posts ago that I thought he'd get 4 games. But they are acting based on the fact that he did something that looks bad on the league. They aren't deciding that he committed a crime beyond the extent of the judicial system's ruling. They never have and never will. Even cases like Vick, they take into account the amount of time the courts force the player off the field when inflicting further punishment.

                The reason every one of these situations brings the same reaction is bc people think the NFL should be bringing trying these cases for a second time and coming down with harsher sentences based on the evidence that us uniformed have alone. The NFL is punishing Rice for getting in trouble with the law, not for hitting a woman. There's a reason they always wait for things to play out in court before deciding what, if anything, they will do in addition.

                Comment

                • NDAlum
                  ND
                  • Jun 2010
                  • 11453

                  #10328
                  Re: NFL Off Topic

                  I think it just needs to be a case by case resolution to every matter!
                  SOS Madden League (PS4) | League Archives
                  SOS Crew Bowl III & VIII Champs

                  Atlanta Braves Fantasy Draft Franchise | Google Docs History
                  NL East Champs 5x | WS Champion 1x (2020)

                  Comment

                  • rangerrick012
                    All Star
                    • Jan 2010
                    • 6201

                    #10329
                    Re: NFL Off Topic

                    Originally posted by wwharton
                    I have no problem with Rice being suspended... correction, I AGREE with Rice being suspended. I just said two posts ago that I thought he'd get 4 games. But they are acting based on the fact that he did something that looks bad on the league. They aren't deciding that he committed a crime beyond the extent of the judicial system's ruling. They never have and never will. Even cases like Vick, they take into account the amount of time the courts force the player off the field when inflicting further punishment.

                    The reason every one of these situations brings the same reaction is bc people think the NFL should be bringing trying these cases for a second time and coming down with harsher sentences based on the evidence that us uniformed have alone. The NFL is punishing Rice for getting in trouble with the law, not for hitting a woman. There's a reason they always wait for things to play out in court before deciding what, if anything, they will do in addition.
                    So I don't get what you're saying, and more importantly the league is saying, with this decision. You're right that we don't have all the info but at the very least we know something went down and Rice laid hands on his woman. Unless she's coming at you with a gun or a weapon, you don't hit a woman. What sort of message does it send with this light sentence (relatively speaking)?
                    Twitter: @rangerrick012

                    PSN: dsavbeast

                    Comment

                    • ubernoob
                      ****
                      • Jul 2004
                      • 15522

                      #10330
                      Re: NFL Off Topic

                      Originally posted by rangerrick012
                      So I don't get what you're saying, and more importantly the league is saying, with this decision. You're right that we don't have all the info but at the very least we know something went down and Rice laid hands on his woman. Unless she's coming at you with a gun or a weapon, you don't hit a woman. What sort of message does it send with this light sentence (relatively speaking)?
                      The NFL doesn't play moral arbiter. They hand out suspensions based on the punishment from the court of law.

                      That's the proper way to do it, for first time offenses at least. Blame the courts and all parties involved (Rice, her and the Ravens) if you want something harsher than what he got.

                      As for Gordon, Blackmon and such... They repeatedly violated policies. It's their own damn fault for being nothing short of miraculously stupid.
                      bad

                      Comment

                      • TracerBullet
                        One Last Job
                        • Jun 2009
                        • 22119

                        #10331
                        Re: NFL Off Topic

                        Josh Gordon Went to Rehab

                        Hopefully it actually helps him.
                        Originally posted by BlueNGold
                        I feel weird for liking a post about exposed penises.

                        Comment

                        • rangerrick012
                          All Star
                          • Jan 2010
                          • 6201

                          #10332
                          Re: NFL Off Topic

                          Originally posted by ubernoob
                          The NFL doesn't play moral arbiter. They hand out suspensions based on the punishment from the court of law.
                          Then explain the Pryor suspension. Or the fact that guys have been suspended for much longer for doing much less in a legal sense.

                          Goodell set himself up as a moral arbiter when he put the PC policy in place. It basically says that anything that damages 'the shield' as it were can lead to you getting punished. Dragging a woman unconscious from an elevator and presumably being the one that caused her to be unconscious doesn't 'damage the shield' enough to warrant more than 2 games?
                          Twitter: @rangerrick012

                          PSN: dsavbeast

                          Comment

                          • jmood88
                            Sean Payton: Retribution
                            • Jul 2003
                            • 34639

                            #10333
                            Re: NFL Off Topic

                            All this Ray Rice stuff is covering up the fact that the NFL and Panthers aren't planning on doing anything about the Greg Hardy situation until after he appeals his guilty convictions, which won't happen until next year.
                            Originally posted by Blzer
                            Let me assure you that I am a huge proponent of size, and it greatly matters. Don't ever let anyone tell you otherwise.

                            If I went any bigger, it would not have properly fit with my equipment, so I had to optimize. I'm okay with it, but I also know what I'm missing with those five inches. :)

                            Comment

                            • LambertandHam
                              All Star
                              • Jul 2010
                              • 8008

                              #10334
                              Re: NFL Off Topic

                              Originally posted by TracerBullet
                              Josh Gordon Went to Rehab

                              Hopefully it actually helps him.
                              The guy has talent, hopefully the Browns will get him help.
                              Steam

                              PSN: BigGreenZaku

                              Comment

                              • mercalnd
                                MVP
                                • Oct 2004
                                • 4261

                                #10335
                                Re: NFL Off Topic

                                Originally posted by rangerrick012
                                Then explain the Pryor suspension.
                                As I recall, Pryor was not suspended by the NFL. He was suspended by the NCAA and the NFL just decided that it would uphold any NCAA suspensions for players that entered the draft instead of serving them.

                                I'm pretty sure that if the tattoo story had come out after he was already in the NFL, the NFL wouldn't have suspended him.

                                Comment

                                Working...