NFL Off Topic

[ProfessaPackMan]

Re: NFL Off Topic 2012

Here are the Vegas Favorites to win it all next year:

The MGM odds:
BRONCOS 5-1
San Francisco 5-1
New England 7-1
Green Bay 7-1
Seattle 10-1
Houston 10-1
Baltimore 10-1
Atlanta 12-1
Pittsburgh 15-1
New Orleans 15-1
Dallas 20-1
Indianapolis 20-1
N.Y. Giants 20-1
Chicago 20-1
Washington 25-1
Philadelphia 25-1
Cincinnati 25-1
Minnesota 25-1
Carolina 30-1
Detroit 30-1
N.Y. Jets 30-1
San Diego 30-1
Miami 50-1
Tampa Bay 50-1
Buffalo 75-1
Tennessee 75-1
Oakland 100-1
Arizona 100-1
Cleveland 100-1
St. Louis 100-1
Kansas City 150-1
Jacksonville 200-1

[TheMatrix31]

Re: NFL Off Topic 2012

Chicago and Miami jump out at me as pretty nice returns if they get lucky. But it's Chicago and Miami, always shooting themselves in the foot.

[Bellsprout]

Buying low on Detroit.

Dayman Jinx 2: The Reckoning.

[Hooe]

Re: NFL Off Topic 2012

If I were a gambling man, I'd take a flyer on Kansas City. They're arguably a QB away from being competitive, and if they make the playoffs, anything can happen. Low risk, high reward.

Having said that, I'm not sure what QB they get. Alex Smith? Geno Smith? Matt Flynn? All certainly more appealing than Brady Quinn or Matt Cassell, but Super Bowl worthy? Probably not, but you never know.

[kingkilla56]

Re: NFL Off Topic 2012

If I were a gambling man, I'd take a flyer on Kansas City. They're arguably a QB away from being competitive, and if they make the playoffs, anything can happen. Low risk, high reward.

Having said that, I'm not sure what QB they get. Alex Smith? Geno Smith? Matt Flynn? All certainly more appealing than Brady Quinn or Matt Cassell, but Super Bowl worthy? Probably not, but you never know.

I love hearing how competitive KC is when they are perennial top 5 draft pick selectors.

[TheShizNo1]

Re: NFL Off Topic 2012

I love hearing how competitive KC is when they are perennial top 5 draft pick selectors.

Colts
Redskins

[ImTellinTim]

Re: NFL Off Topic 2012

OS is a funny place, man.

I've always wondered what it would look like if there was no TOS in place. It'd definitely would be interesting to say the least, especially on this particular subject.

Just go over to YouTube and look at comments. That is what it would be like.

[BlueNGold]

Re: NFL Off Topic 2012

Colts
Redskins

Andrew Luck
Robert Griffin III

Where is Kansas City finding one of them?

[kingkilla56]

Re: NFL Off Topic 2012

Andrew Luck
Robert Griffin III

Where is Kansas City finding one of them?

Lol lets pray right? KC is terrible and has done nothing in years to suggest otherwise. But yeah... Alex Smith LMAO

[TheShizNo1]

Andrew Luck
Robert Griffin III

Where is Kansas City finding one of them?

He just said a QB away. Both teams showed what a QB can do for a team. Both had top 5 picks.

[bigbob]

Re: NFL Off Topic 2012

Lol lets pray right? KC is terrible and has done nothing in years to suggest otherwise. But yeah... Alex Smith LMAO

If by "nothing in years" you mean 2 years.

They showed exactly what they can do whenever they're 100% healthy in 2010.

[SPTO]

Re: NFL Off Topic 2012

I'm sure everyone can get a laugh out of this:

Spoiler

^OS Caucasians supported this.


^OS Minorities supported this.

That's pretty interesting though i'm not a minority though i'm mixed. I just believe in the principle of every person being valued according to their work. I guess I hew more towards Dr. King's color blind society dream.

ANYWAYS.....I still found that interesting and as someone said it'd be mighty interesting if we didn't have the TOS in some areas.

Back to football though, Can't wait to see what the Bills do this offseason. I have very high hopes for Marrone and his staff.

[TripleCrown9]

Re: NFL Off Topic 2012

An interesting fact that ESPN Stats & Info mentioned last night is that Ray Lewis is the first player in NFL history to win two Super Bowls 12 years apart.

[kingkilla56]

Re: NFL Off Topic 2012

If by "nothing in years" you mean 2 years.

They showed exactly what they can do whenever they're 100% healthy in 2010.

I just quickly researched and yeah they havent done anything in years to suggest they arent terrible.

I dont want to hear about how they are a QB away from "competitive" until they are actually competitive.

[bigbob]

Re: NFL Off Topic 2012

I just quickly researched and yeah they havent done anything in years to suggest they arent terrible.

I dont want to hear about how they are a QB away from "competitive" until they are actually competitive.

So, going 10-6 is terrible?

In no way am I saying one season makes them not terrible.. but to say "they haven't done anything in years" is false.

Again, they showed what they can do whenever their team is healthy with an average quarterback.