NFL Off Topic

[ProfessaPackMan]

Re: NFL Off Topic

Just seen pictures of the Cowboys' new Practice Facility.

Very, very impressive.

[Jr.]

Re: NFL Off Topic

This whole time I thought Tirico was hired to take over for Michaels. I had no idea there was all of this hubbub.

[Quint75]

Re: NFL Off Topic

The entire NFL league office is just made up of awful people who only care about money and themselves.

[KG]

Re: NFL Off Topic

The entire NFL league office is just made up of awful people who only care about money and themselves.

I mean they are in the business of making $.

I do like Tirico though. He was pretty solid during the 2016 Euros and is pretty much respected in everything he does.

I can't blame the NFL for wanting the #1 team though but if they want to get picky I would have preferred they got rid of that bum Phil Simms on CBS (I know they can't legally, just wishful thinking)
.

[kehlis]

Re: NFL Off Topic

Doesn't NBCSN have PGA rights? I guess he'll be doing a lot of golf.

NBC only covers a few tournaments each year, most tournaments are covered in the morning by the golf network who partners with NBCSN but that's only the morning coverage until CBS takes over around 3.

[slickdtc]

Re: NFL Off Topic

I had no idea Willie McGinest holds the record for most playoff sacks -- 16.

Then again, when you get to play in the playoffs every damn year you can compile a couple of sacks every playoff run. Lucky dog!

[mestevo]

Re: NFL Off Topic

NFL removes ‘probable’ status from injury reports for 2016 season: https://t.co/xSqbgCYHfs

Fantasy football just got more interesting lol.

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

[kehlis]

Re: NFL Off Topic

NFL removes ‘probable’ status from injury reports for 2016 season: https://t.co/xSqbgCYHfs

Fantasy football just got more interesting lol.

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

I haven't played FF in years but I don't think it changes much.

As far as I know you can still change your lineup up to game time and with active/inactive lists being released hours before the game decision making will still be last minute as it always has been.

[SPTO]

Re: NFL Off Topic

I haven't played FF in years but I don't think it changes much.

As far as I know you can still change your lineup up to game time and with active/inactive lists being released hours before the game decision making will still be last minute as it always has been.

Yes, i'm sure this won't change the whole "game time decision" stuff which most of the time isn't BS but we know some teams like to play around with stuff like this "cough" New England "cough".

[N51_rob]

Re: NFL Off Topic

I haven't played FF in years but I don't think it changes much.

As far as I know you can still change your lineup up to game time and with active/inactive lists being released hours before the game decision making will still be last minute as it always has been.

Yeah, but it can have an effect on choosing the RB that gets 20 carries or the one that gets 12-15.

[kehlis]

Re: NFL Off Topic

Yeah, but it can have an effect on choosing the RB that gets 20 carries or the one that gets 12-15.

True, that makes sense.

I guess I just assumed if a player was probable or questionable it would be reasonable to assume they would get less playing time then usual one way or the other.

[redsox4evur]

Re: NFL Off Topic

True, that makes sense.

I guess I just assumed if a player was probable or questionable it would be reasonable to assume they would get less playing time then usual one way or the other.

Like SPTO said, NE messes with that injury report. I saw this stat earlier from Field Yates. Tom Brady was listed as probable for 139 of the 256 games he's played in. And he still got full playing time. Same with guys like Edelman, Welker, Gronk.

[kehlis]

Re: NFL Off Topic

Like SPTO said, NE messes with that injury report. I saw this stat earlier from Field Yates. Tom Brady was listed as probable for 139 of the 256 games he's played in. And he still got full playing time. Same with guys like Edelman, Welker, Gronk.

Not at all unique to BB and I was responding to the discussion with how it affects those who play FF. Not real life football.

[redsox4evur]

Re: NFL Off Topic

Not at all unique to BB and I was responding to the discussion with how it affects those who play FF. Not real life football.

I was responding to this line: I guess I just assumed if a player was probable or questionable it would be reasonable to assume they would get less playing time then usual one way or the other.

How does that not correspond to real life football?

[kehlis]

Re: NFL Off Topic

I was responding to this line: I guess I just assumed if a player was probable or questionable it would be reasonable to assume they would get less playing time then usual one way or the other.

How does that not correspond to real life football?

Because that response was quoting a post with how it would affect fantasy football. I was actually pretty clear about that up front.