Fate of Coyotes decided in 2 decades(?)

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Money99
    Hall Of Fame
    • Sep 2002
    • 12694

    #121
    re: Fate of Coyotes decided in 2 decades(?)

    I'm tired of this whole soap-opera so I haven't bothered to read the details of the deal.
    Can anyone tell me if the 5-year out-clause is still in this deal?
    Will Glendale still be facing an empty arena in 3 years once the Coyotes inevitably lose $50M in 2.5 seasons and RSE moves the team to a better hockey market?


    EDIT: Got my answer.
    RSE can still move the team after 5 seasons if the team has lost more than $50M (which is a given to happen).

    Meanwhile, I've heard Glendale can't even afford the fire departments water bill.
    That seems about right. They just lost 19 brave men to fires, so it's only fair they spend $15M/season on a hockey team.
    Last edited by Money99; 07-03-2013, 08:51 AM.

    Comment

    • slickdtc
      Grayscale
      • Aug 2004
      • 17125

      #122
      Disgusting. I have no other words.

      NHL needs to strong-arm these clowns and say, we're out. Fat chance...
      NHL - Philadelphia Flyers
      NFL - Buffalo Bills
      MLB - Cincinnati Reds


      Originally posted by Money99
      And how does one levy a check that will result in only a slight concussion? Do they set their shoulder-pads to 'stun'?

      Comment

      • Psyblast
        2023 National Champions
        • Jun 2003
        • 42582

        #123
        re: Fate of Coyotes decided in 2 decades(?)

        Originally posted by slickdtc
        Disgusting. I have no other words.

        NHL needs to strong-arm these clowns and say, we're out. Fat chance...


        HAHA, the NHL is DELIGHTED with this result. One of their illegitimate expansion efforts already burned in a fire and retreated back to Canada...Bettman is thrilled that the aborted fetus of a franchise in Phoenix gets to somehow live on.

        Edit: in fact, here's Bettman's reaction - again! - to the Coyotes news:

        Spoiler
        Last edited by Psyblast; 07-03-2013, 11:19 AM.

        Comment

        • Majingir
          Moderator
          • Apr 2005
          • 47439

          #124
          re: Fate of Coyotes decided in 2 decades(?)

          Coyotes only have 9 guys signed past this season, I hope most guys just don't resign, due to fear of ghosts(since they'll be playing in an arena that will basically be a ghost town).


          With them being called Arizona Coyotes now, which color scheme do people think looks best?


          First one is current
          2nd one is DBacks colors
          3rd one is Arizona Cardinals colors

          Comment

          • BlueNGold
            Hall Of Fame
            • Aug 2009
            • 21817

            #125
            re: Fate of Coyotes decided in 2 decades(?)

            I don't think there's ever been a more appropriate use of this gif:

            Originally posted by bradtxmale
            I like 6 inches. Its not too thin and not too thick. You get the support your body needs.



            Comment

            • jyoung
              Hall Of Fame
              • Dec 2006
              • 11132

              #126
              re: Fate of Coyotes decided in 2 decades(?)

              I didn't watch the meeting last night, but was the team's attendance figures mentioned at all by those favoring a move? Phoenix has either finished dead last or next to last in home attendance five of the last six seasons:

              season--league ranking--average--capacity

              2012-2013 -- 29/30, 13,923, 81.3%
              2011-2012 -- 30/30, 12,420, 72.5%
              2010-2011 -- 29/30, 12,188, 71.2%
              2009--2010 -- 30/30, 11,989, 68.5%
              2008-2009 -- 27/30, 14,875, 85.0%
              2007-2008 -- 29/30, 14,820, 84.7%

              Those attendance records alone should have been the only argument needed to move the team.

              Comment

              • mgoblue
                Go Wings!
                • Jul 2002
                • 25477

                #127
                re: Fate of Coyotes decided in 2 decades(?)

                Originally posted by jyoung
                I didn't watch the meeting last night, but was the team's attendance figures mentioned at all by those favoring a move? Phoenix has either finished dead last or next to last in home attendance five of the last six seasons:

                season--league ranking--average--capacity

                2012-2013 -- 29/30, 13,923, 81.3%
                2011-2012 -- 30/30, 12,420, 72.5%
                2010-2011 -- 29/30, 12,188, 71.2%
                2009--2010 -- 30/30, 11,989, 68.5%
                2008-2009 -- 27/30, 14,875, 85.0%
                2007-2008 -- 29/30, 14,820, 84.7%

                Those attendance records alone should have been the only argument needed to move the team.
                It's hard to get behind a team that may move at any instant....I'd be interested to see the numbers after the next year or two with more stability.

                Not defending the market, and the location of the stadium is abysmal. IMO the arena should be more centralized. The west location is fine for a NFL stadium but not a NHL one IMO.
                Nintendo Switch Friend Code: SW-7009-7102-8818

                Comment

                • Money99
                  Hall Of Fame
                  • Sep 2002
                  • 12694

                  #128
                  re: Fate of Coyotes decided in 2 decades(?)

                  Originally posted by jyoung
                  I didn't watch the meeting last night, but was the team's attendance figures mentioned at all by those favoring a move? Phoenix has either finished dead last or next to last in home attendance five of the last six seasons:

                  season--league ranking--average--capacity

                  2012-2013 -- 29/30, 13,923, 81.3%
                  2011-2012 -- 30/30, 12,420, 72.5%
                  2010-2011 -- 29/30, 12,188, 71.2%
                  2009--2010 -- 30/30, 11,989, 68.5%
                  2008-2009 -- 27/30, 14,875, 85.0%
                  2007-2008 -- 29/30, 14,820, 84.7%

                  Those attendance records alone should have been the only argument needed to move the team.
                  Let's not forget that a great majority of those tickets were given away.
                  I'd love to hear the actual attendance of some games.

                  A member at HFBoards went to a game and took a video showing all the fans in the building.
                  In his estimation (which was pretty much verified in the video), there wasn't more than 1500 fans in the building.
                  Yet the attendance was announced at 12,000+.

                  I bet the Coyotes didn't average more than 5000 people who were physically at the game.

                  mgblue, you're right though. It's hard to sell a team that may or may not be there from one year to the next.
                  This season will prove what kind of fanbase Glendale has.

                  Comment

                  • Coug00
                    LOB
                    • Jul 2002
                    • 3476

                    #129
                    I'm not sure this deal improves any stability, even in the short term. The NHL passed their continuous financial bleed onto a group that had little capital and had to borrow their way to owning and operating a team. On top of that, the timing of the 5 year out clause could nicely coincide with a shiny new arena in Seattle that probably won't have an NHL tenant.

                    Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
                    Member of The OS Baseball Rocket Scientists Association

                    Comment

                    • Money99
                      Hall Of Fame
                      • Sep 2002
                      • 12694

                      #130
                      re: Fate of Coyotes decided in 2 decades(?)

                      Originally posted by Coug00
                      I'm not sure this deal improves any stability, even in the short term. The NHL passed their continuous financial bleed onto a group that had little capital and had to borrow their way to owning and operating a team. On top of that, the timing of the 5 year out clause could nicely coincide with a shiny new arena in Seattle that probably won't have an NHL tenant.

                      Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
                      That should be the NHL's and Glendales largest concern.
                      This new ownership group barely has enough money to even buy the team.

                      This whole think stinks like a Jeff Loria soap opera.
                      This ownership group scrapes just enough money to buy a struggling NHL franchise. The NHL is more than happy to get it off it's hands.
                      5 years and $50M in debt later (of which time the CoG pays them $75M to run the arena), the owners move it to Seattle, or KC, or Vegas and sell for twice as much as they bought it for.
                      The NHL gets its money back, RSE makes a profit, and Glendale has an empty building and a greater margin of debt.

                      Comment

                      • Coug00
                        LOB
                        • Jul 2002
                        • 3476

                        #131
                        It's getting nasty in Glendale. This might not be over after all.



                        Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
                        Member of The OS Baseball Rocket Scientists Association

                        Comment

                        • Redacted01
                          Hall Of Fame
                          • Aug 2007
                          • 10316

                          #132
                          re: Fate of Coyotes decided in 2 decades(?)

                          Originally posted by Coug00
                          It's getting nasty in Glendale. This might not be over after all.



                          Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
                          They are just trying to scare people away from reading that article.

                          Comment

                          • BunnyHardaway
                            Banned
                            • Nov 2004
                            • 15195

                            #133
                            re: Fate of Coyotes decided in 2 decades(?)

                            Originally posted by Coug00
                            It's getting nasty in Glendale. This might not be over after all.



                            Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
                            That lady is awesome.

                            Comment

                            • TracerBullet
                              One Last Job
                              • Jun 2009
                              • 22119

                              #134
                              re: Fate of Coyotes decided in 2 decades(?)

                              She was the one mentioning the libraries and fire departments not having money, right?

                              Man, that is scathing.
                              Originally posted by BlueNGold
                              I feel weird for liking a post about exposed penises.

                              Comment

                              • BunnyHardaway
                                Banned
                                • Nov 2004
                                • 15195

                                #135
                                re: Fate of Coyotes decided in 2 decades(?)

                                WELP

                                Comment

                                Working...