U.S. Dead Last in Healthcare ranking

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • daflyboys
    Banned
    • May 2003
    • 18238

    #151
    Re: U.S. Dead Last in Healthcare ranking

    Originally posted by USF11
    This thread has lasted a pretty long time, Good Conversation.

    ....and I actually agree with you. Make something free and watch the manipulators and spongers come out of the woodwork. You others don't think so? Ok, if you own an establishment, strongly advertise that your product will be free for an extended period of time.

    Comment

    • ESPNdeportes
      MVP
      • Jul 2002
      • 3459

      #152
      Re: U.S. Dead Last in Healthcare ranking

      Originally posted by USF11
      Why should money out of my pocket contribute to the health care of others?
      Money out of your pocket has been paying for others health care since you got your first job, lol. I do hope you realize that.
      Last edited by ESPNdeportes; 01-10-2008, 12:48 PM.
      "You can not ensure success, but you can deserve it." - John Quincy Adams

      PSN: raginrapids

      Comment

      • USF11
        C*rr*ntly *n L*f* T*lt
        • Jun 2003
        • 4245

        #153
        Re: U.S. Dead Last in Healthcare ranking

        Originally posted by ESPNdeportes
        Money out of your pocket has been paying for others health care since you got your first job, lol
        I should of rephrased that to say, Why should "more" money come out of my pocket.

        Seriously, Universal Health Care could only work in America if we first completely reworked our entire legal systems liability laws. Its great in theory, but completely impractical.

        There is just so many hurdles.
        "Good music transcends all physical limits, it's more then something you hear, it's something that you feel, when the author, experience, and passion is real" - Murs (And this is for)

        Comment

        • Hootiefish
          Pro
          • Aug 2002
          • 933

          #154
          Re: U.S. Dead Last in Healthcare ranking

          I think the two biggest problems that face our healthcare system (and need to be changed immediately) are as follows:

          1) Pharmaceutical companies have our country over a barrel with the the high costs of drugs. My wife works for our local health department, so I know how much drugs cost, and how much they really cost.

          2) Insurance companies should never, and I mean never, make medical decisions. Ever. Whether or not an insurance company believes a treatment or procedure is experimental or unnecessary should not affect their coverage. We pay the money for insurance coverage, so pay the ******* bill! It sickens me to hear stories of how people died needlessly because some pencil-pusher vetoed a procedure that a doctor recommended on the grounds that it was deemed "experimental."
          Overall satisfaction also makes the decline!!!!!!!!!!!!

          Comment

          • daflyboys
            Banned
            • May 2003
            • 18238

            #155
            Re: U.S. Dead Last in Healthcare ranking

            Originally posted by Hootiefish
            I think the two biggest problems that face our healthcare system (and need to be changed immediately) are as follows:

            1) Pharmaceutical companies have our country over a barrel with the the high costs of drugs. My wife works for our local health department, so I know how much drugs cost, and how much they really cost.

            I don't want to defend the drug companies, but I have heard that it is about $1 mil in start up costs per drug for the pharm company b/c of FDA rules and regulations.

            Comment

            • Cebby
              Banned
              • Apr 2005
              • 22327

              #156
              Re: U.S. Dead Last in Healthcare ranking

              Originally posted by Hootiefish
              1) Pharmaceutical companies have our country over a barrel with the the high costs of drugs. My wife works for our local health department, so I know how much drugs cost, and how much they really cost.
              Again, drug costs have nothing to do with cost of production. Nothing in the world sells close to the cost of production.

              Pfizer for example, spends $7.5 BILLION a year in research and development.

              You take away profits and you take away R&D. You take away R&D, and you end up with no new drugs.

              Comment

              • born_bad
                MVP
                • Jan 2005
                • 1130

                #157
                Re: U.S. Dead Last in Healthcare ranking

                Originally posted by The Soldier
                Again, drug costs have nothing to do with cost of production. Nothing in the world sells close to the cost of production.

                Pfizer for example, spends $7.5 BILLION a year in research and development.

                You take away profits and you take away R&D. You take away R&D, and you end up with no new drugs.
                The bigger cost for these companies is the marketing. Watch a football game and tell me how many commercials you see for drugs. That's the biggest cost and they're willing to spend it because it's all about profit.

                Explain to me why drugs are so cheap in other countries... I suspect your answer will be "they're not as good," which simply isn't true.

                Comment

                • USF11
                  C*rr*ntly *n L*f* T*lt
                  • Jun 2003
                  • 4245

                  #158
                  Re: U.S. Dead Last in Healthcare ranking

                  Originally posted by born_bad
                  The bigger cost for these companies is the marketing. Watch a football game and tell me how many commercials you see for drugs. That's the biggest cost and they're willing to spend it because it's all about profit.

                  Explain to me why drugs are so cheap in other countries... I suspect your answer will be "they're not as good," which simply isn't true.
                  I am gonna go with the relative cost of living in other countries has something to do with it.
                  "Good music transcends all physical limits, it's more then something you hear, it's something that you feel, when the author, experience, and passion is real" - Murs (And this is for)

                  Comment

                  • Cebby
                    Banned
                    • Apr 2005
                    • 22327

                    #159
                    Re: U.S. Dead Last in Healthcare ranking

                    Originally posted by born_bad
                    Explain to me why drugs are so cheap in other countries... I suspect your answer will be "they're not as good," which simply isn't true.
                    Because those countries didn't spend any money on R&D. They simply perform a chemical analysis on the drug, then reproduce it.

                    Think of it in music terms.

                    US music companies sell CDs for say, $10. Going into that is the cost of studio time, equipment, producing, and most importantly, physically playing the music.

                    Now, I can burn a CD of that same music and sell it for $3. Is it an inferior product? No. But the fact is, I can sell it for cheaper because I had no costs of making the drugs.

                    Go look at the products those Indian and other drugs companies have actually created. It's a list that reads:

                    .
                    .
                    .
                    .
                    .
                    .
                    .
                    .

                    That's what you'll get if you take away the big pharm companies.

                    Comment

                    • Rocky
                      All Star
                      • Jul 2002
                      • 6896

                      #160
                      Re: U.S. Dead Last in Healthcare ranking

                      Originally posted by The Soldier
                      Because those countries didn't spend any money on R&D. They simply perform a chemical analysis on the drug, then reproduce it.

                      Think of it in music terms.

                      US music companies sell CDs for say, $10. Going into that is the cost of studio time, equipment, producing, and most importantly, physically playing the music.

                      Now, I can burn a CD of that same music and sell it for $3. Is it an inferior product? No. But the fact is, I can sell it for cheaper because I had no costs of making the drugs.

                      Go look at the products those Indian and other drugs companies have actually created. It's a list that reads:

                      .
                      .
                      .
                      .
                      .
                      .
                      .
                      .

                      That's what you'll get if you take away the big pharm companies.
                      Actually, some of what you say is true. But the bottom line is that they are a big money business too and will charge what they can get away with....same with any big business in America (your record company analogy was spot on). Make no mistake, they also spend a boatload of money on advertising because they want to make money to get rich.

                      The question is do you want a company equivalent to the sleaze known as the record industry dealing with your health?
                      "Maybe I can't win. But to beat me, he's going to have to kill me. And to kill me, he's gonna have to have the heart to stand in front of me. And to do that, he's got to be willing to die himself. I don't know if he's ready to do that."
                      -Rocky Balboa

                      Comment

                      • jmood88
                        Sean Payton: Retribution
                        • Jul 2003
                        • 34639

                        #161
                        Re: U.S. Dead Last in Healthcare ranking

                        Originally posted by USF11
                        The best Doctors will go where they can make the most money period.
                        It seems like a lot of industrialized countries have universal healthcare, if they wouldn't practice here where would they go?
                        Originally posted by Blzer
                        Let me assure you that I am a huge proponent of size, and it greatly matters. Don't ever let anyone tell you otherwise.

                        If I went any bigger, it would not have properly fit with my equipment, so I had to optimize. I'm okay with it, but I also know what I'm missing with those five inches. :)

                        Comment

                        • jmood88
                          Sean Payton: Retribution
                          • Jul 2003
                          • 34639

                          #162
                          Re: U.S. Dead Last in Healthcare ranking

                          Originally posted by fishepa
                          They can't afford to pay the teachers as much as private school systems, thus they get crappy teachers.
                          Which is due to the system of getting money for schools, not simply because it's a public school.
                          Originally posted by Blzer
                          Let me assure you that I am a huge proponent of size, and it greatly matters. Don't ever let anyone tell you otherwise.

                          If I went any bigger, it would not have properly fit with my equipment, so I had to optimize. I'm okay with it, but I also know what I'm missing with those five inches. :)

                          Comment

                          • ballerzinc
                            T*mpl* *wls
                            • Feb 2004
                            • 1831

                            #163
                            Re: U.S. Dead Last in Healthcare ranking

                            Even if you don't agree for universal healthcare for everyone, can we all agree at least for kids. And our public school system is becoming a tragedy in some inner cities. We can't have innocent kids suffer because their parents don't make enough money to get them to a private school. To take away funds for doing bad on standardized tests is so ridiculous.

                            Comment

                            • dkgojackets
                              Banned
                              • Mar 2005
                              • 13816

                              #164
                              Re: U.S. Dead Last in Healthcare ranking

                              It's not the inner city school systems. It's the inner city kids.

                              I don't have exact numbers, but I'm sure a great majority of students go to public schools. You don't need to pay for private school to get an education.

                              Comment

                              • ballerzinc
                                T*mpl* *wls
                                • Feb 2004
                                • 1831

                                #165
                                Re: U.S. Dead Last in Healthcare ranking

                                Originally posted by dkgojackets
                                It's not the inner city school systems. It's the inner city kids.

                                I don't have exact numbers, but I'm sure a great majority of students go to public schools. You don't need to pay for private school to get an education.
                                I totally agree with getting a good education in a public school. But you can't make a generalization about inner city kids like that, it's just disrespectful. So you don't think the schools there are any of the problem and its just the kids.

                                Comment

                                Working...