I feel like the parts themselves are a lot better than Raimi's trilogy...okay, lets be serious, first two movies. Spiderman3 is pretty much unwatchable.
Anyway, I feel like the parts were better than the sum for this movie and with SM1 and 2 it was the opposite. Raimi did good with a not so great leading cast and a Spiderman that never really developed past putting on the suit and Parker's relationship issues. While ASM didn't really feature Spiderman as this was essentially all about Peter Parker, Garfield definitely gives Spiderman a personality rather than simply being Peter Parker with a basketball mask. Emma Stone/Gwen Stacy is just a notch above Dunst/Mary Jane. I never really liked MJ's fast track into show business and her and Peter's relationship was always very immature. Peter and Gwen were great and I loved how she was actually useful in this rather than being reduced to some action plot device in the third act.
Still, I feel like the storyline in Spiderman 1 and 2 were better and more fully realized. With the way the first half was paced, I thought the second half moved pretty quickly to the resolution and climax. Not to mention the inclusion of some truly eye-rolling, ripped from Golden Age comic books scenes in the end.
As for the credits scenes, I think they purposely did it open ended to hedge their bets on doing a sequel. My thoughts:
As for Gwen...
Comment