The Amazing Spiderman 2

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jmood88
    Sean Payton: Retribution
    • Jul 2003
    • 34639

    #121
    Re: The Amazing Spiderman Sequel (201?)

    Spider-Man 3 really seemed to have killed the character in most critics' eyes, which is a shame. I hated that movie but I love what Marc Webb and Andrew Garfield are doing.
    Originally posted by Blzer
    Let me assure you that I am a huge proponent of size, and it greatly matters. Don't ever let anyone tell you otherwise.

    If I went any bigger, it would not have properly fit with my equipment, so I had to optimize. I'm okay with it, but I also know what I'm missing with those five inches. :)

    Comment

    • slapnutz2k2
      MVP
      • Apr 2005
      • 1356

      #122
      Re: The Amazing Spiderman Sequel (201?)

      Jut came home from seeing it. Sorry, didn't like it all.


      Kinda felt like a love story, too much slow motion and the credit scene was way out of place. Like they stuck it in there at the last minute to keep Marvel heads in their seats longer.

      Comment

      • jmood88
        Sean Payton: Retribution
        • Jul 2003
        • 34639

        #123
        Re: The Amazing Spiderman Sequel (201?)

        Originally posted by jmood88
        Spider-Man 3 really seemed to have killed the character in most critics' eyes, which is a shame. I hated that movie but I love what Marc Webb and Andrew Garfield are doing.
        I really should've watched the movie before I said anything.

        Spoiler
        Originally posted by Blzer
        Let me assure you that I am a huge proponent of size, and it greatly matters. Don't ever let anyone tell you otherwise.

        If I went any bigger, it would not have properly fit with my equipment, so I had to optimize. I'm okay with it, but I also know what I'm missing with those five inches. :)

        Comment

        • BDKiiing
          Best in the World
          • Jun 2008
          • 9334

          #124
          Re: The Amazing Spiderman Sequel (201?)

          Just got home from it. I like it a lot.
          Spoiler
          St. Louis Cardinals | Milwaukee Bucks | Los Angeles Rams
          UWW | UWGB | Duke
          AEW

          Comment

          • LBzrule
            Hall Of Fame
            • Jul 2002
            • 13085

            #125
            Re: The Amazing Spiderman Sequel (201?)

            Just got back from seeing it. I liked it a lot. There were some sticking points but I thought the story arc was great and moving.

            Comment

            • Blzer
              Resident film pundit
              • Mar 2004
              • 42515

              #126
              Re: The Amazing Spiderman Sequel (201?)

              I want to possibly see this tomorrow. It's strange that the RT consensus changed. You don't see that very often.
              Samsung PN60F8500 PDP / Anthem MRX 720 / Klipsch RC-62 II / Klipsch RF-82 II (x2) / Insignia NS-B2111 (x2) / SVS PC13-Ultra / SVS SB-2000 / Sony MDR-7506 Professional / Audio-Technica ATH-R70x / Sony PS3 & PS4 / DirecTV HR44-500 / DarbeeVision DVP-5000 / Panamax M5400-PM / Elgato HD60

              Comment

              • Baseballking888
                MVP
                • Sep 2009
                • 1113

                #127
                Re: The Amazing Spiderman Sequel (201?)

                I think this will definitely be this year's Man of Steel. Expect a lot of debates among the divided fanbases.

                Comment

                • RockinDaMike
                  All Star
                  • Feb 2003
                  • 9091

                  #128
                  Re: The Amazing Spiderman Sequel (201?)

                  I don't have issues with the story arc but I can see why people have issues with it.

                  Can't deny the action in the last part of the movie, holy cow. It's also gotta be the most artistic comic book movie I seen, it was beautifully shot. Can't wait to see it again on an Imax screen.

                  Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk
                  XBL: Mike Deuce
                  PSN: Tutaan
                  Steam: RockinDaMike
                  Activision: MikeDeuce#1448

                  Teams: AZ Cardinals, Suns, Diamondbacks, Duke, Arizona State

                  IG FB

                  Comment

                  • Leon
                    An Old Trafford
                    • Mar 2003
                    • 4981

                    #129
                    Re: The Amazing Spiderman Sequel (201?)

                    Movie looked cool as hell, but they totally sacrificed Peter Parker/Spider-Man for the sake of putting villains in for no real reason at all other than to "set-up" the Sinister Six movie. Seriously guys, did you not learn from Spider-Man 3? I came out feeling like I watched an improved version of that movie.

                    Electro could've been the sympathetic villain, but then he simply decides that he hates Spidey 'cos he got tricked. The Lizard was sympathetic to a point; the execution here is off. Rhino? Thanks for showing up. Harry Osborn could've been really good, but everything just feels too rushed for it to have any real impact.

                    Then there's
                    Spoiler


                    Great special effects. Cool movie. Lousy story.
                    "It's not how big you are; it's how big you play" - David Thompson

                    @nicroni

                    Comment

                    • jmood88
                      Sean Payton: Retribution
                      • Jul 2003
                      • 34639

                      #130
                      Re: The Amazing Spiderman Sequel (201?)

                      Originally posted by Leon
                      Movie looked cool as hell, but they totally sacrificed Peter Parker/Spider-Man for the sake of putting villains in for no real reason at all other than to "set-up" the Sinister Six movie. Seriously guys, did you not learn from Spider-Man 3? I came out feeling like I watched an improved version of that movie.

                      Electro could've been the sympathetic villain, but then he simply decides that he hates Spidey 'cos he got tricked. The Lizard was sympathetic to a point; the execution here is off. Rhino? Thanks for showing up. Harry Osborn could've been really good, but everything just feels too rushed for it to have any real impact.

                      Then there's
                      Spoiler


                      Great special effects. Cool movie. Lousy story.
                      Spoiler
                      Originally posted by Blzer
                      Let me assure you that I am a huge proponent of size, and it greatly matters. Don't ever let anyone tell you otherwise.

                      If I went any bigger, it would not have properly fit with my equipment, so I had to optimize. I'm okay with it, but I also know what I'm missing with those five inches. :)

                      Comment

                      • Leon
                        An Old Trafford
                        • Mar 2003
                        • 4981

                        #131
                        Re: The Amazing Spiderman Sequel (201?)

                        Originally posted by jmood88
                        Spoiler


                        Again, you'd think they've learned from Spider-Man 3.
                        "It's not how big you are; it's how big you play" - David Thompson

                        @nicroni

                        Comment

                        • GAMEC0CK2002
                          Stayin Alive
                          • Aug 2002
                          • 10384

                          #132
                          Re: The Amazing Spiderman Sequel (201?)

                          Originally posted by Leon


                          Again, you'd think they've learned from Spider-Man 3.
                          Saw it in 3D. First off, the 3D was fine but definitely not a must have.

                          The movie itself I liked, though it gave me similar feelings that I had in SM 3. Too much story line and too much love. There were plenty of well choreographed action scenes though.

                          Comment

                          • The 24th Letter
                            ERA
                            • Oct 2007
                            • 39373

                            #133
                            Re: The Amazing Spiderman Sequel (201?)

                            Movie exceeded my expectations.

                            IMO this movie and Spiderman 3 shouldn't even be mentioned in the same sentence...as a comic fan, the movie was so....'Spiderman' to me....and I loved the way the movie looked. Jamie Foxx even held his own and I wasn't expecting that at all....

                            Comment

                            • Leon
                              An Old Trafford
                              • Mar 2003
                              • 4981

                              #134
                              Re: The Amazing Spiderman Sequel (201?)

                              Originally posted by GAMEC0CK2002
                              Saw it in 3D. First off, the 3D was fine but definitely not a must have.

                              The movie itself I liked, though it gave me similar feelings that I had in SM 3. Too much story line and too much love. There were plenty of well choreographed action scenes though.
                              Too much love? I'd say the opposite! What this movie suffers from is villain introduction.
                              "It's not how big you are; it's how big you play" - David Thompson

                              @nicroni

                              Comment

                              • spankdatazz22
                                All Star
                                • May 2003
                                • 6219

                                #135
                                Re: The Amazing Spiderman Sequel (201?)

                                Saw it last night in 2D; didn't like the movie much at all. I'd say it's the worst of all the Spiderman movies. It seemed a lot like Spiderman 3 with the overabundance of villains but I thought the Sandman/Venom/Harry Osborne Green Goblin but at least with that movie everyone was better developed. Some of the stuff this one did was cringe-worthy for me; never reached Batman and Robin level corny but it skirted it some. The first Amazing Spiderman was far better imo. In this one they tried to cram too many villains; two in an unbelievably short period of time.

                                The girlfriend surprisingly liked it although she admitted it didn't come close to any of the Avengers movies. Guess my seeing Captain America a few weeks ago didn't help either. I'm a big Spiderman fan and this was pretty disappointing. I did think they did a mostly great job with the Peter Parker/Gwen Stacy relationship though.
                                HBO's "The Wire" should rank as one of the top 10 shows EVER on tv - period

                                XBL gamertag: d0meBreaker22 (that's a zero)

                                congrats Steelers, city of Pittsburgh, and Steeler Nation - SIX TIME WORLD CHAMPS

                                Comment

                                Working...