Suicide Squad (2016?)

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • RockinDaMike
    All Star
    • Feb 2003
    • 9091

    #346
    Re: Suicide Squad (2016?)

    From what I been reading and seeing on youtube, WB got so scared of what happened to BvS that they made another version of what David Ayers wanted to do.

    Too many cooks in the kitchen. Just let the director do his job and make the movie with his vision. I really hope they show a directors cut in the blu ray so we can see all those supposed Joker scenes that were deleted.
    XBL: Mike Deuce
    PSN: Tutaan
    Steam: RockinDaMike
    Activision: MikeDeuce#1448

    Teams: AZ Cardinals, Suns, Diamondbacks, Duke, Arizona State

    IG FB

    Comment

    • Beantown
      #DoYourJob
      • Feb 2005
      • 31523

      #347
      Re: Suicide Squad (2016?)

      Originally posted by RockinDaMike
      From what I been reading and seeing on youtube, WB got so scared of what happened to BvS that they made another version of what David Ayers wanted to do.
      He could just be a good solider, but David Ayer is saying differently himself:

      For his part, however, Ayer is standing by his movie. In a recent interview, he insisted that “the released movie is my cut,” though we can probably still expect to see some deleted scenes when Suicide Squad finally makes its way to home video.

      yer acknowledged that while plenty of footage was left on the cutting room floor, the final theatrical edit is his cut:

      "We have a chunk, there’s definitely over 10 minutes of material on there. But this cut of the movie is my cut, there’s no sort of parallel universe version of the movie, the released movie is my cut. And that’s one of the toughest things about writing, shooting, and directing a film, is you end up with these orphans and you ****ing love them and you think they’d be amazing scenes and do these amazing things but the film is a dictatorship (laughs), not a democracy, and just because something’s cool and charismatic doesn’t mean it gets to survive in the final cut. The flow of the movie is the highest master."

      Comment

      • Blzer
        Resident film pundit
        • Mar 2004
        • 42517

        #348
        Re: Suicide Squad (2016?)

        Originally posted by Beantown
        He could just be a good solider, but David Ayer is saying differently himself:
        That's very interesting because of how I compared this film to a single off a music album. His scenes that he left out, in themselves, were also probably "single-capable" but did not piece as well with the rest of the album.

        Case in point, the Joker scenes that are left out would have probably taken a lot of the focus off of the SS members, or it would have heavily unbalanced the character exposure even more than it already is.
        Samsung PN60F8500 PDP / Anthem MRX 720 / Klipsch RC-62 II / Klipsch RF-82 II (x2) / Insignia NS-B2111 (x2) / SVS PC13-Ultra / SVS SB-2000 / Sony MDR-7506 Professional / Audio-Technica ATH-R70x / Sony PS3 & PS4 / DirecTV HR44-500 / DarbeeVision DVP-5000 / Panamax M5400-PM / Elgato HD60

        Comment

        • The JareBear
          Be Good To One Another
          • Jul 2010
          • 11560

          #349
          Re: Suicide Squad (2016?)

          I haven't seen it yet but really enjoying the non-spoiler discussions.

          I was thinking, is part of the problem with DCU that the biggest DC villains have either already been done, or are connected to heroes that haven't had their time to shine yet?

          Two Face, Scarecrow, Bane, Ra's, were just done. Joker 3 is basically a tease in this movie from what I hear. Doomsday, done (still makes me lose sleep at night). Luther can turn out great but maybe needs a few tweaks moving forward.

          Zod was done and done well

          Sinestro? I mean I think we all wanna pretend that movie never happened. Is there official word if Green Lantern is getting rebooted under Snyders jurisdiction (in the Justice League universe?)

          Brainiac, bizzaro, black Adam, vandal savage, Deathstroke, not sure where they would fit in moving forward. They could do Brainiac in a JL movie if they wanted to, I think.

          Darkseid seems like he's coming, and Mongul could be with him, which would be great

          Reverse Flash, Grodd, I assume we will see something there in the flash standalone(s)

          My hope is that Snyderverse takes full advantage of having no connection to all prior films and brings back Two-face, riddler, bane, penguin, and the likes along with this Joker to give batman a proper rogues gallery.

          Originally posted by RockinDaMike
          From what I been reading and seeing on youtube, WB got so scared of what happened to BvS that they made another version of what David Ayers wanted to do.

          Too many cooks in the kitchen. Just let the director do his job and make the movie with his vision. I really hope they show a directors cut in the blu ray so we can see all those supposed Joker scenes that were deleted.
          Yeah it sounds like WB is a little mindscrewed over BvS's critical reception and are second guessing everything to the detriment of their products.

          Edit

          I feel like my post doesn't make sense. Sorry about that
          Last edited by The JareBear; 08-05-2016, 05:07 PM.
          "Successful people do not celebrate in the adversity or misfortune of others."

          OS Blog

          The Tortured Mind Of A Rockies Fan. In Arenado I Trust.

          Comment

          • Beantown
            #DoYourJob
            • Feb 2005
            • 31523

            #350
            Re: Suicide Squad (2016?)

            Originally posted by The JareBear
            Joker 3 is basically a tease in this movie from what I hear.
            He has more than enough time in a film that his only connection to is Harley, in my opinion.

            Would I have liked to see more of him? Definitely.

            Were there many more spots where it made sense for him to be there? Not really, no. I'm interested in seeing what was cut.

            Comment

            • The JareBear
              Be Good To One Another
              • Jul 2010
              • 11560

              #351
              Re: Suicide Squad (2016?)

              Originally posted by Beantown
              He has more than enough time in a film that his only connection to is Harley, in my opinion.

              Would I have liked to see more of him? Definitely.

              Were there many more spots where it made sense for him to be there? Not really, no. I'm interested in seeing what was cut.
              Well I know I'm not gonna get any likes, but whatever

              I believe you, I know others have said the same thing, but just for the sake of discussion....

              Would I be wrong by saying that a big deal in terms of marketing this movie was that "Joker is in it," and while I think we all knew he wasn't the main bad guy or whatever ( I still have no idea who the bad guy is), it just seems like that isn't a role you put in the back row. I feel like the majority of discussion regarding this film was about Joker, starting with the first pictures released way back when that lit the Internet on fire.

              Again it's probably dumb if me to be discussing anything at all as I haven't seen the film and only have these impressions and critic reviews to go off of.

              Like I said earlier, I understand if it's the same concept as not wanting Vader to have too big a role in Rogue One.
              "Successful people do not celebrate in the adversity or misfortune of others."

              OS Blog

              The Tortured Mind Of A Rockies Fan. In Arenado I Trust.

              Comment

              • Blzer
                Resident film pundit
                • Mar 2004
                • 42517

                #352
                Re: Suicide Squad (2016?)

                I understand your question, but I always saw him as a back character in this film. Maybe it's because he wasn't announced with the rest of the initial cast or what have you, but I never expected him to be a big player.

                This does go right back back to jeremy's point though: if a Batman film was made, or something that featured The Joker more prominently before this film, there would have not been any hoopla about exposing him more here. I think people will be forgiving about it if any other films highlight him more.

                Too much of him in this particular movie would have been a bad thing. It would have been a distraction for the sake of saying, "Look everybody, it's The Joker!" I'm glad he was limited, even if his other scenes could have served as somewhat distinguishable.
                Samsung PN60F8500 PDP / Anthem MRX 720 / Klipsch RC-62 II / Klipsch RF-82 II (x2) / Insignia NS-B2111 (x2) / SVS PC13-Ultra / SVS SB-2000 / Sony MDR-7506 Professional / Audio-Technica ATH-R70x / Sony PS3 & PS4 / DirecTV HR44-500 / DarbeeVision DVP-5000 / Panamax M5400-PM / Elgato HD60

                Comment

                • Beantown
                  #DoYourJob
                  • Feb 2005
                  • 31523

                  #353
                  Re: Suicide Squad (2016?)

                  Originally posted by The JareBear

                  Like I said earlier, I understand if it's the same concept as not wanting Vader to have too big a role in Rogue One.


                  From the sounds of it, Joker has much more screen time than Vader is going to have.

                  He's probably be fifth most important character, screen time wise, as it is. Maybe sixth, at the worst. He's already featured heavier than most of the Squad itself.

                  Just as a note - my personal rankings of screen time importance in this movie:

                  Spoiler
                  Last edited by Beantown; 08-05-2016, 05:29 PM.

                  Comment

                  • TripleCrown9
                    Keep the Faith
                    • May 2010
                    • 23679

                    #354
                    Re: Suicide Squad (2016?)

                    Originally posted by The JareBear
                    I haven't seen it yet but really enjoying the non-spoiler discussions.

                    I was thinking, is part of the problem with DCU that the biggest DC villains have either already been done, or are connected to heroes that haven't had their time to shine yet?

                    Two Face, Scarecrow, Bane, Ra's, were just done. Joker 3 is basically a tease in this movie from what I hear. Doomsday, done (still makes me lose sleep at night). Luther can turn out great but maybe needs a few tweaks moving forward.

                    Zod was done and done well

                    Sinestro? I mean I think we all wanna pretend that movie never happened. Is there official word if Green Lantern is getting rebooted under Snyders jurisdiction (in the Justice League universe?)

                    Brainiac, bizzaro, black Adam, vandal savage, Deathstroke, not sure where they would fit in moving forward. They could do Brainiac in a JL movie if they wanted to, I think.

                    Darkseid seems like he's coming, and Mongul could be with him, which would be great

                    Reverse Flash, Grodd, I assume we will see something there in the flash standalone(s)

                    My hope is that Snyderverse takes full advantage of having no connection to all prior films and brings back Two-face, riddler, bane, penguin, and the likes along with this Joker to give batman a proper rogues gallery.



                    Yeah it sounds like WB is a little mindscrewed over BvS's critical reception and are second guessing everything to the detriment of their products.

                    Edit

                    I feel like my post doesn't make sense. Sorry about that
                    Yes, and it's called Green Lantern Corps.
                    Boston Red Sox
                    1903 1912 1915 1916 1918 2004 2007 2013 2018
                    9 4 1 8 27 6 14 45 26 34

                    Comment

                    • jfsolo
                      Live Action, please?
                      • May 2003
                      • 12965

                      #355
                      Re: Suicide Squad (2016?)

                      Originally posted by Beantown
                      Bingo.

                      The villain is bad. Marvel's villains have also been pretty awful outside of Loki (people seem to only point to Thor 2...all of Iron Man's villains have sucked, Ant-Man's villain wasn't awesome, the first Captian America's villain was a let-down, Winter Soldier was done well but not mind-blowing) so that is just an unfair over-critique.

                      Also, Leto proved he can pull this Joker off which means the next Batman movie should probably take the mantle for "Best comic book movie villain since The Joker" with...well...The Joker, ha.

                      Harley, Deadshot and Waller steal the show. I agree that some of Smith's lines seem like they're obviously the ones they went back and edited because they felt a little forced/out-of-place, but overall he actually made me forget that it was Will Smith for long enough.

                      I actually liked Flagg (man, imagine if that had been Hardy) but I just didn't have any reason to care for him. I liked Croc up until the end. I liked El Diablo, aside from some of his dialogue at the end. Didn't care about Katana or Boomerang. Enchantress was hit or miss.

                      It's a fun movie, which is what it set out to be, I think. I have zero regrets about seeing it and can't wait to watch it again knowing what I'm getting so I can see if I enjoy it more.
                      Totally agree with this take.


                      Originally posted by Blzer
                      That's very interesting because of how I compared this film to a single off a music album. His scenes that he left out, in themselves, were also probably "single-capable" but did not piece as well with the rest of the album.

                      Case in point, the Joker scenes that are left out would have probably taken a lot of the focus off of the SS members, or it would have heavily unbalanced the character exposure even more than it already is.
                      Originally posted by Blzer
                      I understand your question, but I always saw him as a back character in this film. Maybe it's because he wasn't announced with the rest of the initial cast or what have you, but I never expected him to be a big player.

                      This does go right back back to jeremy's point though: if a Batman film was made, or something that featured The Joker more prominently before this film, there would have not been any hoopla about exposing him more here. I think people will be forgiving about it if any other films highlight him more.

                      Too much of him in this particular movie would have been a bad thing. It would have been a distraction for the sake of saying, "Look everybody, it's The Joker!" I'm glad he was limited, even if his other scenes could have served as somewhat distinguishable.
                      Originally posted by Beantown
                      He has more than enough time in a film that his only connection to is Harley, in my opinion.

                      Would I have liked to see more of him? Definitely.

                      Were there many more spots where it made sense for him to be there? Not really, no. I'm interested in seeing what was cut.
                      I agree that the Joker had more than enough screen time. If any scenes were to be added in, it should be of some of the the other Squad members besides Harley and Deadshot.
                      Jordan Mychal Lemos
                      @crypticjordan

                      Do this today: Instead of $%*#!@& on a game you're not going to play or movie you're not going to watch, say something good about a piece of media you're excited about.

                      Do the same thing tomorrow. And the next. Now do it forever.

                      Comment

                      • Stormyhog
                        All Star
                        • Feb 2004
                        • 5304

                        #356
                        Re: Suicide Squad (2016?)

                        Saw it this afternoon & I really enjoyed it. Nothing bothered me even the villian wasn't bad to me. I know some would have preferred the Joker to be the main villian but I think he'll be more utilized in a Batman solo film. Even so I think Leto was a great Joker, different I know but it worked for me. I liked how the music was used as it fit the style of the film well. I would give the film an 8/10. It was a fun & that's what matters most to me. I do hope to see an ultimate edition like BvS.
                        "If you don't have anything good to say, say it often"- Ed the sock

                        Comment

                        • Blzer
                          Resident film pundit
                          • Mar 2004
                          • 42517

                          #357
                          Re: Suicide Squad (2016?)

                          Originally posted by Stormyhog
                          Saw it this afternoon & I really enjoyed it. Nothing bothered me even the villian wasn't bad to me. I know some would have preferred the Joker to be the main villian but I think he'll be more utilized in a Batman solo film. Even so I think Leto was a great Joker, different I know but it worked for me. I liked how the music was used as it fit the style of the film well. I would give the film an 8/10. It was a fun & that's what matters most to me. I do hope to see an ultimate edition like BvS.
                          I wouldn't want The Joker to be the main villain in this film. When they first started shooting the film though, I thought they were going to be tasked to kill some people, and maybe one of their first tasked missions would be to kill The Joker.

                          Would have been cool if this film was with different missions, then it would certainly have that "fights in different places" kind of pacing that most of these CBM's have.
                          Samsung PN60F8500 PDP / Anthem MRX 720 / Klipsch RC-62 II / Klipsch RF-82 II (x2) / Insignia NS-B2111 (x2) / SVS PC13-Ultra / SVS SB-2000 / Sony MDR-7506 Professional / Audio-Technica ATH-R70x / Sony PS3 & PS4 / DirecTV HR44-500 / DarbeeVision DVP-5000 / Panamax M5400-PM / Elgato HD60

                          Comment

                          • RockinDaMike
                            All Star
                            • Feb 2003
                            • 9091

                            #358
                            Re: Suicide Squad (2016?)

                            My biggest gripe about this movie was
                            Spoiler
                            XBL: Mike Deuce
                            PSN: Tutaan
                            Steam: RockinDaMike
                            Activision: MikeDeuce#1448

                            Teams: AZ Cardinals, Suns, Diamondbacks, Duke, Arizona State

                            IG FB

                            Comment

                            • ExtremeGamer
                              Extra Life 11/3/18
                              • Jul 2002
                              • 35299

                              #359
                              Re: Suicide Squad (2016?)

                              More thoughts

                              Spoiler



                              Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

                              Mixer Stream



                              XBox - ExtremeGamer
                              PSN - ExtremeGamer
                              Switch - 4640-8613-7710

                              Comment

                              • Leon
                                An Old Trafford
                                • Mar 2003
                                • 4981

                                #360
                                Re: Suicide Squad (2016?)

                                Originally posted by RockinDaMike
                                My biggest gripe about this movie was
                                Spoiler
                                Same thing with the Marvel movies though. Why wouldn't the Avengers step in for a world ending threat? See Thor 2 for such an example.

                                I think it's just something we have to set aside.
                                "It's not how big you are; it's how big you play" - David Thompson

                                @nicroni

                                Comment

                                Working...