100% agree
The Star Wars franchise had been around for almost a decade before I was born so I never really 'lived' it. I was still exposed to it before the pequels came out though. Also, with regard to any form of story More is not always better. The phrase "less is more" absolutely applied in the OT. The fact that we never had this deep exposition of Vader or the Emperor was never a problem because their status was almost mystical. Those brief allusions to Vader and his master by the other characters were enough. Mix in some scenes that actually feature them like Vader interrogating Leia in IV and the absolute fear displayed by the entire bridge in V when Vader's Star Destroyer is chasing the Falcon and it just all ties together.
With Kylo we do get a much deeper exploration of his character and complexities. This could actually be a good thing as we've already had the mystical villain role played out in the OT, but I think the execution hasn't been there. Part of it is I think that Adam Driver was absolutely miscast (I know I'm not the only one who couldn't take him seriously the moment he removed his helmet in TFA). I think an equally, or even more, compelling factor in that though has been the way his character was written which often seems to conveniently ignore the fact that he has been one of the leaders of The First Order for several years before we ever meet him in TFA. Only if you ignore that then does the complete lack of fear from his subordinates (ie: the Vader example earlier) and the random outbursts like that of an emo teen start to make sense.
Comment