1. Kind of besides the point. But why would we assume that no one else would find out even if we are assuming Varys never got the word out?
When Tyrion spoke to Varys, the first thing he asks is who else knows. Then he says, well it's not a secret then. Hundreds will know soon. Hell we saw how quickly Jon let the cat out the bag, then Sansa, then Tyrion. And those were after they promised not to tell. So why would we believe that would be kept secret now?
Based on what we've seen, it would make more sense to assume that the people would find out.
2. Mad King did a lot of ****ed up things before he decided to wildfire the city. Part of the reason why he was given the name. I'm not saying Jamie did it for those reasons. But only Jamie knew what the King was about to do before he killed them. So even with people knowing how ****ty the Mad King was, Jamie was still vilified throughout the kingdom. It's not a reach that Jon could get similar treatment.
Just pointing out again, Tyrion in this episode said half the people hate him for being with the Queen and the other half hate him for betraying her. Why would Jon be treated any differently?
3) Agreed that in retrospect the decisions he made were the right decisions. The problem is in the moments leading up to them, he alienated his subordinates and the people he was supposed to be leading. The Nights Watch wanted no part of the wildlings and he brings them across the wall. The North have sought out their independence from season one and then, once he becomes king in the north, he bends the knee to a foreigner.
He doesn't know how to manage people or play "the game". He just does what he feels is right. And in the show we see how it has negatively affected the people he is supposed to be leading, whether it winds up being the right thing in the future or not. As King, he couldn't continue doing that. He would have to be smarter, which he hasn't shown that he's able to do to this point.
Bran on the other hand is "the three eyed Raven". He knows all of history. How each decision has played out throughout each reign. He can see or predict the future (I think... maybe...who knows? Lol). He's best equipped to make decisions more than anyone with the "powers" he has. And more than anything else, he wouldn't make any decisions out of personal gain or let emotions cloud his judgement like the other characters would.
That wasn't the point at all. The point is Jon Snow would not do that to begin with.
For all of this talk about character arcs and what character would or would not do, you think it makes sense for Jon to kill Dany and then try to get away with it? Cmon now. Y'all critics would have had a field day with that [emoji23]
My joke about Walter White was not about comparing their characters. It was just made in reference to you saying he should have cleaned up the blood (breaking bad style) to get away with a murder. Lol
Comment