More Links

kylefoley94 · 01-30-2013, 11:34 AM

after last night's Top 100 Prospect reveal Bogaerts is #20, Bradley Jr is #32, Barnes is #38, Webster is #71, and Owens is #94 I just figured this may help in determining ratings and potentials for these guys

CameRoN0407 · 01-30-2013, 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kylefoley94


	after last night's Top 100 Prospect reveal Bogaerts is #20, Bradley Jr is #32, Barnes is #38, Webster is #71, and Owens is #94 I just figured this may help in determining ratings and potentials for these guys

I really don't go by John Mayo's ratings. I mean he's good, but there are better out there.

yanksdaniel99 · 01-30-2013, 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Readyornot0407


	I really don't go by John Mayo's ratings. I mean he's good, but there are better out there.

Mayo's probably one of the worst lol.In this case, Xander should probably a tad bit higher & Bradley & Barnes a tad bit lower. They weren't too bad this year actually, some of the scout grades and placement of guys like Gregorious & Ethan Martin were LOL worthy though.

seanjeezy · 01-30-2013, 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Readyornot0407


	I really don't go by John Mayo's ratings. I mean he's good, but there are better out there.

They're not really his ratings either, they poll 50 scouts and come up with a composite rating.

CameRoN0407 · 01-30-2013, 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by seanjeezy


	They're not really his ratings either, they poll 50 scouts and come up with a composite rating.

Wow, I didn't know that. I thought since it said "John Mayo is blah blah blah" it was him! And yea, I think Xander should've been in the T15.

seanjeezy · 01-30-2013, 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Readyornot0407


	Wow, I didn't know that. I thought since it said "John Mayo is blah blah blah" it was him! And yea, I think Xander should've been in the T15.

Xander is a top 5 hitter IMO, love the guy.

CameRoN0407 · 01-30-2013, 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by seanjeezy


	Xander is a top 5 hitter IMO, love the guy.

Well I can't give an unbiased placement because:

Xander Bogaerts = Easily my Favorite Prospect. Soon to be Fav player.

legacyme3 · 02-10-2013, 12:02 AM

Like last year, I argue Bradley should be considered an A.

The big concern last year, as I recall was that he was in his first season and hadn't "proven" himself.

He was kind of a big deal, being one of the best players in the system.

He can hit, run, field... and is only getting better.

Barnes was a tricky case, but I think he needs to stay a B. If its debatable between low a and high b... then he should be the latter.

01-30-2013, 11:34 AM	#17
kylefoley94 Banned OVR: 5 Join Date: May 2012 Location: North Shore	Re: 2013 OSFM: Boston Red Sox after last night's Top 100 Prospect reveal Bogaerts is #20, Bradley Jr is #32, Barnes is #38, Webster is #71, and Owens is #94 I just figured this may help in determining ratings and potentials for these guys Readyornot0407 likes this.

02-10-2013, 12:02 AM	#24
legacyme3 Pro OVR: 5 Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: Milton, NH Blog Entries: 2	Re: 2013 OSFM: Boston Red Sox Like last year, I argue Bradley should be considered an A. The big concern last year, as I recall was that he was in his first season and hadn't "proven" himself. He was kind of a big deal, being one of the best players in the system. He can hit, run, field... and is only getting better. Barnes was a tricky case, but I think he needs to stay a B. If its debatable between low a and high b... then he should be the latter. __________________ -the least famous person you've never heard of.

	A New Patch Creates That Urge to Start Fresh
	NBA 2K25 MyNBA: How to Avoid Too Many Free Agents Staying Unsigned
	College Football 25 Guide: What Goes Into a 'Best Playbook' and How to Find Your Own

More Links

2013 OSFM: Boston Red Sox