More Links

kylefoley94 · 01-30-2013, 11:34 AM

after last night's Top 100 Prospect reveal Bogaerts is #20, Bradley Jr is #32, Barnes is #38, Webster is #71, and Owens is #94 I just figured this may help in determining ratings and potentials for these guys

CameRoN0407 · 01-30-2013, 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kylefoley94


	after last night's Top 100 Prospect reveal Bogaerts is #20, Bradley Jr is #32, Barnes is #38, Webster is #71, and Owens is #94 I just figured this may help in determining ratings and potentials for these guys

I really don't go by John Mayo's ratings. I mean he's good, but there are better out there.

yanksdaniel99 · 01-30-2013, 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Readyornot0407


	I really don't go by John Mayo's ratings. I mean he's good, but there are better out there.

Mayo's probably one of the worst lol.In this case, Xander should probably a tad bit higher & Bradley & Barnes a tad bit lower. They weren't too bad this year actually, some of the scout grades and placement of guys like Gregorious & Ethan Martin were LOL worthy though.

seanjeezy · 01-30-2013, 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Readyornot0407


	I really don't go by John Mayo's ratings. I mean he's good, but there are better out there.

They're not really his ratings either, they poll 50 scouts and come up with a composite rating.

CameRoN0407 · 01-30-2013, 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by seanjeezy


	They're not really his ratings either, they poll 50 scouts and come up with a composite rating.

Wow, I didn't know that. I thought since it said "John Mayo is blah blah blah" it was him! And yea, I think Xander should've been in the T15.

seanjeezy · 01-30-2013, 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Readyornot0407


	Wow, I didn't know that. I thought since it said "John Mayo is blah blah blah" it was him! And yea, I think Xander should've been in the T15.

Xander is a top 5 hitter IMO, love the guy.

CameRoN0407 · 01-30-2013, 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by seanjeezy


	Xander is a top 5 hitter IMO, love the guy.

Well I can't give an unbiased placement because:

Xander Bogaerts = Easily my Favorite Prospect. Soon to be Fav player.

legacyme3 · 02-10-2013, 12:02 AM

Like last year, I argue Bradley should be considered an A.

The big concern last year, as I recall was that he was in his first season and hadn't "proven" himself.

He was kind of a big deal, being one of the best players in the system.

He can hit, run, field... and is only getting better.

Barnes was a tricky case, but I think he needs to stay a B. If its debatable between low a and high b... then he should be the latter.

01-30-2013, 11:34 AM	#17
kylefoley94 Banned OVR: 5 Join Date: May 2012 Location: North Shore	Re: 2013 OSFM: Boston Red Sox after last night's Top 100 Prospect reveal Bogaerts is #20, Bradley Jr is #32, Barnes is #38, Webster is #71, and Owens is #94 I just figured this may help in determining ratings and potentials for these guys Readyornot0407 likes this.

02-10-2013, 12:02 AM	#24
legacyme3 Pro OVR: 5 Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: Milton, NH Blog Entries: 2	Re: 2013 OSFM: Boston Red Sox Like last year, I argue Bradley should be considered an A. The big concern last year, as I recall was that he was in his first season and hadn't "proven" himself. He was kind of a big deal, being one of the best players in the system. He can hit, run, field... and is only getting better. Barnes was a tricky case, but I think he needs to stay a B. If its debatable between low a and high b... then he should be the latter. __________________ -the least famous person you've never heard of.

	Voting Has Begun for the 2024 Sports Game of the Year
	College Football 26 Must Do More With Transfer Portal
	What Is Pro Yakyuu Spirits 2024/Professional Baseball Spirits 2024, and How Do You Get It?

More Links

2013 OSFM: Boston Red Sox