OSFM Draft Version

[bravesfan1984]

40 man version is up and a new thread started. As always, all credit to Ridin. Thanks!

[Mikelopedia]

Just uploaded to the vault this roster with real contract salaries.

Besides each player having their real life numbers to go along with the correct length, I also cleaned up the minor leagues a bit as well.
No more prospects making 6 figures.

Under OSFM Draft + Contracts username: MiiikeMarsh

Big thanks to Ridin on a fantastic roster. Just wanted to give the community the option of having real salaries since this has been something people frequently ask about.

[ctpot4]

Quote: Originally Posted by redsoxfan31

ctpot, I was curious if you did the roster foundation trick that we used last year for our collaboration

No I have not redsoxfan. Feel free to do that again.

[Powertoyourhead]

How can i easily find yankee prospects in the large player vault?

[Godgers12]

Is it possible to perhaps get Trey Griffey in somehow?

Also, and this is a pet peeve of mine with these sets. Why the low and inconsistent potentials? It comes down to trade value within franchise. It pains me to see top prospects irl traded for middle relievers and backup catchers. To make them consistent, I'd do it by tier, draft position for the rookies and ranking for all other prospects. For instance, for newly drafted players, top 5 = 95 pot, 6-15 = 92 pot, 16-30 = 88, and so on. It just ruins trade value when you guys low ball prospects on their potential.

[RogueHominid]

Quote: Originally Posted by Mikelopedia

Just uploaded to the vault this roster with real contract salaries. Besides each player having their real life numbers to go along with the correct length, I also cleaned up the minor leagues a bit as well. No more prospects making 6 figures. Under OSFM Draft + Contracts username: MiiikeMarsh Big thanks to Ridin on a fantastic roster. Just wanted to give the community the option of having real salaries since this has been something people frequently ask about.

My understanding was that this was based off of 3.5, which already had correct salaries.

Did I miss something? Could you expand more on what percentage of contracts were off in your estimation, or on how significantly the MILB contracts were adjusted?

[WaitTilNextYear]

Quote: Originally Posted by Godgers12

Is it possible to perhaps get Trey Griffey in somehow? Also, and this is a pet peeve of mine with these sets. Why the low and inconsistent potentials? It comes down to trade value within franchise. It pains me to see top prospects irl traded for middle relievers and backup catchers. To make them consistent, I'd do it by tier, draft position for the rookies and ranking for all other prospects. For instance, for newly drafted players, top 5 = 95 pot, 6-15 = 92 pot, 16-30 = 88, and so on. It just ruins trade value when you guys low ball prospects on their potential.

And it would take you a couple of hours to fix this to your liking as opposed to adding a couple of hours onto the folks who have already spent hundreds of hours giving you something to use for free. A few kind words, biting your tongue, or phrasing it some other way wouldn't kill you, eh?

[ctpot4]

Quote: Originally Posted by Godgers12

Is it possible to perhaps get Trey Griffey in somehow? Also, and this is a pet peeve of mine with these sets. Why the low and inconsistent potentials? It comes down to trade value within franchise. It pains me to see top prospects irl traded for middle relievers and backup catchers. To make them consistent, I'd do it by tier, draft position for the rookies and ranking for all other prospects. For instance, for newly drafted players, top 5 = 95 pot, 6-15 = 92 pot, 16-30 = 88, and so on. It just ruins trade value when you guys low ball prospects on their potential.

Well the draft doesn't quite work like that. Each player has different potential no matter where they are drafted. The 16 player drafted is a lot different than the 30th in both skills and potential. Plus, out of the 16-30 players drafted only a handful would be around 85 potential.