Updated Wrigley field ?

[cts50]

Quote: Originally Posted by countryboy

End of conversation

So you dont question anything in your life? You never ask any questions or look for more details?


Thats sad.

[countryboy]

Quote: Originally Posted by cts50

So you dont question anything in your life? You never ask any questions or look for more details? Thats sad.

There is nothing to question here. SCEA removed the updates due to legal reasons. They said they would not discuss the reasons.


You can ask the question a million times and that will be your answer each time from the only source that matters.

[dalger21]

Quote: Originally Posted by countryboy

There is nothing to question here. SCEA removed the updates due to legal reasons. They said they would not discuss the reasons.

Pretty much sums it up.

[Knight165]

Quote: Originally Posted by cts50

I haven't been saying "I dont understand" about anything related to the issue other than the fact that I dont understand why everyone is so pissy about this whole issue. Why cant I question it? And why are you getting upset that I am questioning it? It is bizarre behavior. This is a forum. I am asking questions because that is part of what people do on forums. You seem to want me to keep my mouth shut and stop talking about Wrigley Field in MLB The Show 15....which "I don't understand" hahaha "SCEA didn't disclose reasons and there is no reason they need to disclose any reason in this regard to a group of gamers." This is all well and good, but it doesnt mean I cannot question their decision. I know the situation better than you do. Based on my knowledge of the lawsuits, SCEA had no reason to exclude the jumbotrons from Wrigley. In the end, it is just a game, and its not a huge deal, but it wouldve been cool to see an accurate stadium (that we saw in previews of the game). Sorry if that is upsetting to you.

Right...so this is a forum...and when people got "pissy" about your little hissy fit over Wrigley...in which they were telling you why the changes had to be removed.....you are now going to tell people NOT to get on you about it?
What a joke.

I love when people post in a forum.....then question why others are replying to them(in any fashion) and use the "this is a forum" defense when trying to support their right to post.

Gotta love the internet!

M.K.
Knight165

[thaSLAB]

I must say, I am quite amused.

htcONE [M8] 5.0 | Tapatalk

[Ghost Of The Year]

As litigious as people are willing to be when it comes to lawsuits & the legal system, I don't see how anyone can question the Show's decision to play it safe.

[StevenSD]

I'm surprised this thread has made it 6 pages long...

Surprised and amused.

To stay on topic though, I love how Wriggly looks this year, I can't wait until/if they have the dead ivy to begin seasons and watch that grow green throughout the year. One can dream for future installments.

[cts50]

Quote: Originally Posted by countryboy

There is nothing to question here. SCEA removed the updates due to legal reasons. They said they would not discuss the reasons. You can ask the question a million times and that will be your answer each time from the only source that matters.

But I am asking what the legal reasons were. If they feel as if they cannot be revealed, then I am just gonna go ahead and assume they are stupid reasons.


I still dont understand why everyone gets so defense about this. I'm not questioning SCEA's integrity or anything. It is a simple question.