I think he makes a lot more sense paired with West. And not so much with Magic, for obvious reasons. (If matchups on other side allow for this, of course. And also with the admission that one can run unexpected P&R between a secondary ballhandler and Magic, to mix things up.)
Well, just to make sure it's clear, I don't have Diamond Manu (yet). I'm just assuming that he's even better than the Emerald...I mean, he obviously is, in general, but I mean specifically with his dribbling.
I am wondering with people's impressions of Diamond Manu's dribbling is, especially in comparison to other elite ball handlers.
I think I played the Handles TP once or twice, but I'll try him again on my my budget Challenge teams.
I'm now running through a ton of different guys in my collection, trying to figure out who's fun and who I'll keep, to save them from the post-PD-West-acquisition sell-off.
Mmkay. I'm basically there. I just need the most expensive one in the Collection, Vinny del Negro. And only because I want to try to pay close to what I've seen as low price on the card.
I think that's definitely the case. Either most fun, or biggest sentimental historic favorites, theme teams, etc.
I would imagine his D is okay to solid. But I don't know.
And you'll see in the above conversation, if opponent is not running really big guys, I think PD West and Ginobili can definitely make sense.
Although...if one really wants to be picky, they don't. PD West's big differentiator is not so much the elite 3-point shooting, which is now pretty common, but his HoF Mid-Range Deadeye. Manu's differentiator is his ballhandling and HoF Acrobat.
To take fullest advantage of both, they both need to be ball-dominant.
That new Diamond Jimmer, taking defense out of the equation, might be fun to run with someone like Manu, if playing Manu at 2. Basically use Manu as the PG and Jimmer as the off-guard running around screens.
Which is to say: from my perspective, Manu is a point guard and one is slotting him in at 1 or 2 depending on defensive matchups.