Home

2016 LA Lakers - Hollywood Going Young

This is a discussion on 2016 LA Lakers - Hollywood Going Young within the NBA Official Team Threads forums.

Go Back   Operation Sports Forums > Basketball > Pro Basketball > NBA Official Team Threads
MLB The Show 24 Review: Another Solid Hit for the Series
New Star GP Review: Old-School Arcade Fun
Where Are Our College Basketball Video Game Rumors?
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-15-2016, 07:03 AM   #25
SD/LA Chargers?
 
TheBrothers24's Arena
 
OVR: 17
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,915
Re: 2016 LA Lakers - Hollywood Going Young

Yeah I read the threads but rarely post because of the exactly what happened.

I'll start posting over there then. I'm usually on SB nation
__________________
"This is for all of my peoples who understand and truly recognize. Some won't get it and for that i won't apologize"- Talib Kweli
TheBrothers24 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 04-17-2016, 03:20 PM   #26
MVP
 
Caveman24's Arena
 
OVR: 25
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: DMV
Posts: 1,327
Re: 2016 LA Lakers - Hollywood Going Young

If we end up with the 3rd OVR pick, we need to take a look at trading it.
__________________
Online Championship Wrestling
Caveman24 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2016, 07:03 AM   #27
SD/LA Chargers?
 
TheBrothers24's Arena
 
OVR: 17
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,915
Re: 2016 LA Lakers - Hollywood Going Young

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caveman24
If we end up with the 3rd OVR pick, we need to take a look at trading it.
Agree. Bender may be the only one worth taking there but he's a project and more of a 4 than a 5.

I honestly would rather us lose the pick than end up with #3.
__________________
"This is for all of my peoples who understand and truly recognize. Some won't get it and for that i won't apologize"- Talib Kweli
TheBrothers24 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2016, 07:53 AM   #28
MVP
 
Caveman24's Arena
 
OVR: 25
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: DMV
Posts: 1,327
Re: 2016 LA Lakers - Hollywood Going Young

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBrothers24
Agree. Bender may be the only one worth taking there but he's a project and more of a 4 than a 5.

I honestly would rather us lose the pick than end up with #3.
Ok, I'm nit going that far with losing the pick.
__________________
Online Championship Wrestling
Caveman24 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2016, 08:54 AM   #29
SD/LA Chargers?
 
TheBrothers24's Arena
 
OVR: 17
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,915
Re: 2016 LA Lakers - Hollywood Going Young

It depends on if you think this class has more than 2 franchise type players.

The problem with this year's class is that it's strengths(G/PF) are what we don't need. Ingram is the only plug and play SF in the draft worth going in the top 3. Simmons is just a freak and would absolutely play over Randle. After that there aren't many players in positions we need.

Next year's class has more big men and SF to choose from.
__________________
"This is for all of my peoples who understand and truly recognize. Some won't get it and for that i won't apologize"- Talib Kweli
TheBrothers24 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2016, 07:47 AM   #30
MVP
 
Caveman24's Arena
 
OVR: 25
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: DMV
Posts: 1,327
Re: 2016 LA Lakers - Hollywood Going Young

Losing the pick is still a terrible idea lol. Honestly, I think we'll get 3rd OVR.
__________________
Online Championship Wrestling
Caveman24 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2016, 04:45 PM   #31
Vni
Hall Of Fame
 
Vni's Arena
 
OVR: 23
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: France
Re: 2016 LA Lakers - Hollywood Going Young

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caveman24
Losing the pick is still a terrible idea lol. Honestly, I think we'll get 3rd OVR.
Wat ? We'll get the top pick man. Gotta have hope.
Spoiler
Vni is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 04-20-2016, 04:55 PM   #32
Vni
Hall Of Fame
 
Vni's Arena
 
OVR: 23
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: France
Re: 2016 LA Lakers - Hollywood Going Young

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBrothers24
It depends on if you think this class has more than 2 franchise type players.

The problem with this year's class is that it's strengths(G/PF) are what we don't need. Ingram is the only plug and play SF in the draft worth going in the top 3. Simmons is just a freak and would absolutely play over Randle. After that there aren't many players in positions we need.

Next year's class has more big men and SF to choose from.
Imo since we really don't have a team nor do we have guaranties of how our young players are gonna develop we need to pick the best player we can get regardless of his position or how he fits with the assets we already have. If we had a team it'd be different but we don't.

Quote:
hris Haynes: Lakers F Brandon Bass to decline 2016-17 player option, become unrestricted free agent this summer, league source informs @clevelanddotcom. – via Twitter ChrisBHaynes
I really liked Bass. Good guy and good player.

Last edited by Vni; 04-20-2016 at 05:08 PM.
Vni is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

« Operation Sports Forums > Basketball > Pro Basketball > NBA Official Team Threads »



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:08 AM.
Top -