Haha, no, you cant compare the 2. TECMO bowl was great because its what we had at the time. There wasnt anything to really compare it to, that has completely changed since then.
Again, nope. NCAA 04, for the time, did look good, played well and had alot of the things ppl were calling for at the time.
Nope. Again. NCAA doesn't have the small details that made past titles great. The fact that the game doesn't play that well is just an added shot.
And you're pretty much wrong. The gameplay is solid but the overall experience is increased because of the attention to detail. You can not like GTA IV, but if you cant see that whats there is really well made, then you have no business talking quality as you just cant recognize quality.
Well IW focused on all equally. They didnt release a CoD without having all 3 being solid. I agree gameplay is the root of all gaming, I'm not arguing that. What i am saying is its NOT the ONLY thing that matters. If you have great gameplay and that alone, your title wont be anything to write home about. Your problem is you see ppl complaining about the lack of long hair or other equipment and think its just about that, its not. Its about detail. Detail that has been missing since the leap to the current line of systems. They can fix both gameplay and add to the detail/presentation at the same time. If NOTHING else in this game changes other than the gameplay, you are still going to have a mediocre title.