OS Debate: Real Time Physics or Authentic True to Life Presentation?

[Sheen_O_Mack]

RTP hands down.

RTP will increase the re-playabilty of a game, if I go into a season and play all 16 games and the hits/throws/catches/swats pileups or lack thereof are the same few animations all the time I (as well as a whole lot of others) will get bored and get bored quickly, RTP changes that with a wide variety of different things that can happen on every play of every game.

That being said RTP could potentially make a game very good, TTL Presentation makes a game cool to see a few times but both implemented properly could make a game great.

[loloben]

RTP. RTP is more important for football, however, for most other sports I'd choose presentation over RTP.

[xTriiipZx]

I don't care how awesome the presentation is if it feels like I'm playing an arcade game.

Gameplay first... presentation second.

Both are extremely important though.

[SHORTEXAS]

I THINK IT SHOULD BE BOTH

[sydrogerdavid]

Gameplay over presentation, especially in physical sports like hockey and football. I'm perfectly happy with PS2 Madden-like presentation.

[siouxredskins]

always gameplay over presentation. But you want both with the amount of tech available but only in well thought out places and not dwelled on.

NCAA 13 demo= I was tapping X to get through the score updates immediately. They just get in the way of my game

[BGPurples3]

I like real-time physics.

[jackgold46]

I would say real-time technology because display only goes so far in film games. Unless developers way to do ongoing up-dates, the display will start to sound like a broken record. 2k has been the go in display yet it gets boring after so long. I would rather have real technology so I can increase a film games limitations in what I can do on any given execute. I stay for creating awesome moments.