|
Quote: |
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted by WTF |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You talking about 2007/2008? THAT Lebron was a different Lebron, a kid having fun playing the game. Not the same because he started being scrutinized after passing to Damon Jones for a wide open look, and everyone began the "Is he clutch" talk...
He'd get 3 quarters through his answer and then stop...
To answer the question, you give him the ball. He is as intelligent of a basketball player that there is in the game, let him read the situation. If he takes the shot, the shot needed to be taken by him. If he drives and dishes, it was "probably" the right basketball play. LBJ has GREAT knowledge of the game, and how to make the right play. He just doesn't force the issue when history has shown us that he should (if he wants a clutch label).
The Buzzer beaters that Jordan made, Kobe made, the greats before him have made, weren't technically the "right" basketball play for the "team", but because they had supreme confidence in their individual game, they went against the grain, rose up and took the shot.
And therein lies part of the problem. Lebron has confidence in his Team game, and his individual game is "behind" because of it. Best true talent in the game today, but isn't and probably will never be a selfish enough player, that the greats before him have conditioned us to believe is clutch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Really good post, man.
As many have already mentioned, this is asking the wrong question... and it's really annoying hearing ex coaches and players who know better running with this angle. It's not about who takes the last shot. The last shot should be the one with the greatest chance of going in. Since we're using the Lakers game as an example, an open 3 for Blake has a greater chance of going in than a shot by Kobe with 3 guys guarding him.
The real problem is the idea that getting the ball to the player you want to shoot and running an iso is the best way to approach the situation. Of course it worked for Jordan bc he's Jordan. But digging even deeper, guys like Kobe and Pierce have the type of game for it as well (on occasion). James is not that player. Wade is to a certain extent, but when he's on a team with James and Bosh, there are many other scenarios that would create better chances of them scoring than running an iso for Wade (or James).
You shouldn't be predictable but the best play imo for a healthy Heat team would be getting the ball to James with Bosh setting a high screen at the top of the key intended to open a drive for James to the side of the court Wade is on. LBJ either goes to the hoop, hits Bosh on the roll or Wade on the wing if his man collapses to help. If the ball goes to Wade, Bosh is in position to flash the paint and James circles around for a potential kick back.
There are other options too, but if you're not setting a pick of some sort for Lebron I don't like him having the ball... way too much thinking for him in these situations and he's got internal battles in his head on what the right thing to do is to win the game vs to silence critics if it doesn't work. In these cases I'd like to see James set a screen for someone then open up to get the ball posting, and make a QUICK decision once he catches it then (he's been much better at this part of his game this year but the QUICK part would be most important here). Otherwise, I'd like to see them run James off a number of screens, almost Ray Allen style so he gets the ball and can either immediately drive or shoot.
When we talk about Paxson and Kerr and other situations like that, the important thing is the attention the superstar is getting from the defense that creates the open looks for these guys. When you run that iso play, the defense can get in position physically and mentally for whatever you're going to try to do. If the play is built for James to take the shot (which it should be in most cases), the defense needs more to think about. This can happen if he's catching the ball off a pass and just deciding to drive or shoot right away (bc the D would have to be worried about the ball handler as well as James); or if he's getting a high screen which forces a double rotation if it's a proper screen, and at least gets them out of position for one of a couple of good passing options.
As far as what the media is going on about, the real question should be "Who can finish a game better the way Jordan did?" And the answer to that would be Wade, but to the coach it should be nobody.