Is 18-1 better than 17-0?

[rog152]

On paper 18-1=17 and 17-0 is 17, but we all know this isn't math or is it?
The Patriots won more games but equaled the Dolphins record, did they accomplished anything?

[JBH3]

Quote: Originally Posted by rog152

On paper 18-1=17 and 17-0 is 17, but we all know this isn't math or is it? The Patriots won more games but equaled the Dolphins record, did they accomplished anything?

No it's not because they didn't win the Superbowl. The Pat's played the Jets, Dolphins, and Bills twice. Aside from the Bills no other team in that division was anywhere near competitive this year.

W/ the Pats they got 4 wins from crap teams. I think the Dolphins record and perfect season was much more impressive.

[Jukeman]

Two letters N O

[Cebby]

The 2007 Pats would destroy that Dolphins team.

[Scott]

you seem so sure about that...how bout they play each other..oh wait.

[Jukeman]

Quote: Originally Posted by The Soldier

The 2007 Pats would destroy that Dolphins team.

thats not a fact

[Cebby]

Quote: Originally Posted by juk34man

thats not a fact

I think it's pretty likely that a team that won 18 games and lost one game by 3 would beat a team comprised of people in their 50s, 60s, and dead folk.

[SPTO]

Quick name the loser of the SB in 2005!

If it takes you a while to remember well that's just what will happen with the Pats this year. They're just another team on the heap of SB Losers while the Giants have immortality.

So, no 18-1 isn't better.