Harder to win - National Title or Superbowl?

[NoDakHusker]

Quote: Originally Posted by lilbently

lol you dont get it, WASHINGTON ST OR SYRACUSE AND OTHER TEAMS AT THE BOTTOM OF THE BCS CONFERENCES HAVE NO SHOT AT THE TITLE. Only teams in the top 15-12 have a true "shot" at the title. And when i brought up Auburn going undefeated and playing in the SEC you had nothing to say to that. If a team in the SEC can go undefeated and not have a "shot" at the title, then there are a lot more teams behind them. I will keep my 80% anyday over your 55 percent lol, you mean almost half of college football have a shot at the title. No way buddy.

I do get it. You seem to be lost on the point that I'm making, and quite frankly I'm sick of re explaining myself. That % is not based on how the teams do, it's based on the number of teams in BCS conferences, if any given team from that conference goes undefeated, they have a shot at going to the game.
Yeah, Auburn deserved to go to the game. So I don't really care what you think, because I know what I'm talking about. I'm done with you, because really lilbently, you've brought me to the edge. I could go off, but because of better judgment and the fact that this just a forum, I won't.
Peace.
PS dont call me buddy.

[Buckeyes_Doc]

Quote: Originally Posted by ndhusker90

I do get it. You seem to be lost on the point that I'm making, and quite frankly I'm sick of re explaining myself. That % is not based on how the teams do, it's based on the number of teams in BCS conferences, if any given team from that conference goes undefeated, they have a shot at going to the game. Yeah, Auburn deserved to go to the game. So I don't really care what you think, because I know what I'm talking about. I'm done with you, because really lilbently, you've brought me to the edge. I could go off, but because of better judgment and the fact that this just a forum, I won't. Peace. PS dont call me buddy.

Alright hot dog I really dont get your variables either but i thank this has gotten too far we both have our opinions on the matter and lets leave it at that. lets just move on.

[NoDakHusker]

Quote: Originally Posted by lilbently

Alright hot dog I really dont get your variables either but i thank this has gotten too far we both have our opinions on the matter and lets leave it at that. lets just move on.

agreed. we're better than this.
PS thanks, I like being called hot dog.

[Rocky]

There is only one answer to this and it is the Super Bowl.

If the NFL was like college football, the Panthers and Titans would be in the Super Bowl last year and would not have to prove that they were the best teams in the NFL.

[Speedy]

Quote: Originally Posted by Rocky

There is only one answer to this and it is the Super Bowl. If the NFL was like college football, the Panthers and Titans would be in the Super Bowl last year and would not have to prove that they were the best teams in the NFL.

Actually, the NYG was the #1 seed in the NFC last year.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008%E2...9_NFL_playoffs

[Sandman42]

Quote: Originally Posted by WakeUnc2321

Actually, the NYG was the #1 seed in the NFC last year. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008%E2...9_NFL_playoffs

The BCS would screw it up and end up ranking the Panthers above them anyway.

[DerkontheOS]

National Title.....A team has to go undefeated, or one lose, to have a chance at even being in it..... So that's about 13-14 games they have to win and an NFL has to win.....Um let's say 9, to be a wild card, so that puts us at around 12. In 12 of those wins they have to be consistent in 3 of them to make it to the Super Bowl. All in all, they are both pretty damn hard to win and a team has to have a lot of four leaf clovers to win either, if you get what I'm saying.

[DerkontheOS]

O plus you have to add in the variable of the messed up ranking system...Utah fans know. Also, keeping 18-21 year old kids consistent is harder than 29, I believe NFL average, year old men.