More Links

Gotmadskillzson · 10-24-2011, 01:08 PM

Every year I noticed other websites always have this and most of the stuff that wins end up getting worked on for the up coming title. We as a community need to be more pro active and less reactive.

Time to let our OS voice be heard. Vote for what you want to see improved. Leave some DETAILED constructive ideas. It is still early enough in NCAA 13 development cycle to get stuff added in.

NO BASHING

NO DISRESPECTING

NO COMPARING TO OTHER GAMES OR OTHER GAME COMPANIES

blkrptnt819 · 10-24-2011, 01:35 PM

I just got done voting on TGT. It would be nice to get one on here. Depth charts changes, physics system

BurghFan · 10-24-2011, 01:57 PM

Definitely need some improvements in human/CPU player interactions.

The main improvement in dynasty I want is the return of FCS teams. When FCS teams appear on my teams schedule, I want to actually play that team rather than some generic team like I could back on the PS2.

Solidice · 10-24-2011, 01:58 PM

I voted for WR/DB interaction, OL/DL interaction, and Special teams. I would like to see the others, but I think those would be the top 3 for me.

DJ · 10-24-2011, 02:23 PM

WR/DB interaction is up there for me, along with adopting Madden's spread-out ratings so we can get more separation between players in terms of skill level.

Commentary and presentation upgrades are big for me as well.

TDAWG89 · 10-24-2011, 03:45 PM

If they are going to leave animations in the game at least update them and improve them. Breaking a tackle is hardly an advantage now because it takes so long for the animation to end.. same goes with catching, the animations are too slow and the player is usually down where he catches the ball instead of being able to run after the catch

mWolfe · 10-24-2011, 03:58 PM

I voted for most of them, but my vote for the expanded ratings system and what I think they need to do is take the general Strength rating and make it into Upper Strength and Lower Strength that way instead of the ball carrier either pushing down a bigger player or falling backwards from a smaller player his legs will keep turning and fighting forward while carrying a few weaker people with him. I would also lose the general pass and run block and add aggresivness and chemistry, one is obvious the higher the aggresineness the harder they will hit run ect., chemistry could be use for the type of sytem they run so that if you spread type team a scrambling QB will have low chemisrty and lower ratings while a pockect passer will have a high chemisrty higher ratings and be a better fit it that scheme.

blkrptnt819 · 10-24-2011, 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mWolfe


	I voted for most of them, but my vote for the expanded ratings system and what I think they need to do is take the general Strength rating and make it into Upper Strength and Lower Strength that way instead of the ball carrier either pushing down a bigger player or falling backwards from a smaller player his legs will keep turning and fighting forward while carrying a few weaker people with him. I would also lose the general pass and run block and add aggresivness and chemistry, one is obvious the higher the aggresineness the harder they will hit run ect., chemistry could be use for the type of sytem they run so that if you spread type team a scrambling QB will have low chemisrty and lower ratings while a pockect passer will have a high chemisrty higher ratings and be a better fit it that scheme.

But some teams are spread run and don't use pocket passers. Should they be punished?!?!

View Poll Results: What do you want to see improved in NCAA 13
WR/DB Interaction	208	65.41%
Offensive/Defenisve Line Interaction	166	52.20%
CPU Ball Carrier Logic - Usage of special moves, improved ball carrier vision, using the entire field when running	148	46.54%
Tackling	93	29.25%
Commentary	165	51.89%
Dynamic Weather	110	34.59%
Dynasty	190	59.75%
Road to Glory	66	20.75%
Special Teams - blocking on returns and blocking of FGs/Punts	149	46.86%
Presentation - Pregame, Halftime, Post Game	152	47.80%
Coach Mode - coach mode online, coach mode online dynasty	46	14.47%
Sliders - More sliders	105	33.02%
Ratings - Expanded IE: scramble, deep throw accuracy, medium accuracy, short, accuracy, throw on the run, DPP, roll out	171	53.77%
Player Models - Body types, stances, running styles, throwing styles, hair styles	137	43.08%
Equipment	90	28.30%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 318. You may not vote on this poll

10-24-2011, 01:08 PM	#1
Gotmadskillzson Live your life OVR: 49 Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Vermont Posts: 22,948 Blog Entries: 91	What you want to see improved in NCAA 13 Poll Every year I noticed other websites always have this and most of the stuff that wins end up getting worked on for the up coming title. We as a community need to be more pro active and less reactive. Time to let our OS voice be heard. Vote for what you want to see improved. Leave some DETAILED constructive ideas. It is still early enough in NCAA 13 development cycle to get stuff added in. NO BASHING NO DISRESPECTING NO COMPARING TO OTHER GAMES OR OTHER GAME COMPANIES

10-24-2011, 01:35 PM	#2
blkrptnt819 MVP OVR: 10 Join Date: Feb 2011	I just got done voting on TGT. It would be nice to get one on here. Depth charts changes, physics system WipeOut464 likes this. __________________ CFB: Ohio State, FSU CBB: DUKIE BLUE DEVILS!!!!!!! NBA: Cleveland Cavaliers If you can't tell I LOVE DUKE!!!!!!!!

10-24-2011, 01:57 PM	#3
BurghFan #BurghProud OVR: 34 Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Pittsburgh, PA Posts: 10,083 Blog Entries: 2	Re: What you want to see improved in NCAA 13 Poll Definitely need some improvements in human/CPU player interactions. The main improvement in dynasty I want is the return of FCS teams. When FCS teams appear on my teams schedule, I want to actually play that team rather than some generic team like I could back on the PS2. Lakshmi likes this. __________________ Moderator Steelers: IX, X, XIII, XIV, XL, XLIII Penguins:1990/91, 1991/92, 2008/09, 20015/16, 2016/17 Pirates:1909, 1925, 1960, 1971, 1979 Panthers (FB): 1915, 1916, 1918, 1929, 1931, 1934, 1936, 1937, 1976 Panthers (MBB): 1927/28, 1929/30

10-24-2011, 01:58 PM	#4
Solidice Guns Up! OVR: 63 Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: DFW, Texas Posts: 9,478 Blog Entries: 41	Re: What you want to see improved in NCAA 13 Poll I voted for WR/DB interaction, OL/DL interaction, and Special teams. I would like to see the others, but I think those would be the top 3 for me. __________________ Xbox Live ID: Solidice Steam ID: solidice0 Origin ID: Solidice0 Current Main Rotation: Destiny 2 (XB,PC), Division 2(XB) Baldur Gate 3(XB 4p Co-op run) HellDivers 2 (PC) Games on the list to play: Too many to fit here

	MLB The Show 24 Review: Another Solid Hit for the Series
	New Star GP Review: Old-School Arcade Fun
	Where Are Our College Basketball Video Game Rumors?

10-24-2011, 02:23 PM	#5
DJ Hall Of Fame OVR: 47 Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Florida Posts: 17,748 Blog Entries: 101	Re: What you want to see improved in NCAA 13 Poll WR/DB interaction is up there for me, along with adopting Madden's spread-out ratings so we can get more separation between players in terms of skill level. Commentary and presentation upgrades are big for me as well. MIFB13 likes this.

10-24-2011, 03:45 PM	#6
TDAWG89 Banned OVR: 17 Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: Athens, GA Posts: 534 Blog Entries: 1	Re: What you want to see improved in NCAA 13 Poll If they are going to leave animations in the game at least update them and improve them. Breaking a tackle is hardly an advantage now because it takes so long for the animation to end.. same goes with catching, the animations are too slow and the player is usually down where he catches the ball instead of being able to run after the catch TN - BRAVES FAN and blkrptnt819 like this.

10-24-2011, 03:58 PM	#7
mWolfe Pro OVR: 7 Join Date: Sep 2010	Re: What you want to see improved in NCAA 13 Poll I voted for most of them, but my vote for the expanded ratings system and what I think they need to do is take the general Strength rating and make it into Upper Strength and Lower Strength that way instead of the ball carrier either pushing down a bigger player or falling backwards from a smaller player his legs will keep turning and fighting forward while carrying a few weaker people with him. I would also lose the general pass and run block and add aggresivness and chemistry, one is obvious the higher the aggresineness the harder they will hit run ect., chemistry could be use for the type of sytem they run so that if you spread type team a scrambling QB will have low chemisrty and lower ratings while a pockect passer will have a high chemisrty higher ratings and be a better fit it that scheme. Last edited by mWolfe; 10-24-2011 at 04:00 PM.

More Links

What you want to see improved in NCAA 13 Poll