MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dpower15
    MVP
    • Jul 2012
    • 1029

    #1666
    Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

    Originally posted by ESexton18
    I think a package of those players for Price is fine, too.

    As far as hitters, what do you guys think about the possibility of Matt Kemp being moved? The Dodgers have 4 starting quality OFs and either Crawford or Puig could play CF.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

    Comment

    • UTAllTheWay
      Pro
      • Mar 2008
      • 643

      #1667
      Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

      Well I decided to go ahead and pull the trigger on a Chris Carter to Pittsburgh trade.

      I was hoping to get either Hanson or Glasnow, but I felt you guys were right. That's too much for a win-now power bat that strikes out a lot.

      I did Nick Kingham + Adalberto Santos for Carter.

      Santos will probably never go anywhere in my organization.

      Next on the list is Jesse Crain.

      Comment

      • BA2929
        The Designated Hitter
        • Jul 2008
        • 3342

        #1668
        Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

        I noticed on the spreadsheet that Greg Holland was listed as "Unrealistic – The team thinks highly of him". While this is true for 2014, there is a possibility of him being traded in the off-season following the 2014 season.

        So, while it's not realistic for him to be dealt this year (as long as the Royals are in contention), if you want to go after him after the 2014 season in your franchise that would be realistic imo.
        "Baseball is the coolest sport because, at any moment, the catcher can stop the game and go tell the pitcher a secret" - Rob Fee

        Comment

        • Jr.
          Playgirl Coverboy
          • Feb 2003
          • 19171

          #1669
          Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

          Originally posted by BA2929
          I noticed on the spreadsheet that Greg Holland was listed as "Unrealistic – The team thinks highly of him". While this is true for 2014, there is a possibility of him being traded in the off-season following the 2014 season.

          So, while it's not realistic for him to be dealt this year (as long as the Royals are in contention), if you want to go after him after the 2014 season in your franchise that would be realistic imo.
          It's just a guide. I'm sure had this sheet been made 2 years ago, Wil Myers would've had the same label next to his name.
          My favorite teams are better than your favorite teams

          Watch me play video games

          Comment

          • ESexton18
            Rookie
            • Apr 2014
            • 203

            #1670
            Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

            Originally posted by 37
            I personally don't think 2 A's+ 2 B's is enough for Stanton....problem is, Im not the biggest Biddle fan either.....I'd prolly go with Urias, Franco, Pederson, Seager, Crawford....so it'd be 2 A's +3 B's which isn't bad on your side
            That's so much haha... but you're entirely right that's what it'd take for Stanton. I'm wondering if it's worth it.. Pederson was the only regular from the major league level and can't really deny that Stanton is an upgrade. Such talent to give up... but for a top 5/10 position player I think it might be worth it anyway.
            Phillies | A's | Michigan State | Browns | Chelsea FC | Bruins

            Comment

            • Redskinsfan26
              Pro
              • Jul 2009
              • 624

              #1671
              Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

              Originally posted by ESexton18
              That's so much haha... but you're entirely right that's what it'd take for Stanton. I'm wondering if it's worth it.. Pederson was the only regular from the major league level and can't really deny that Stanton is an upgrade. Such talent to give up... but for a top 5/10 position player I think it might be worth it anyway.
              No way is that worth it. One player is never worth five top prospects.
              REDSKINS & WIZARDS

              Comment

              • BA2929
                The Designated Hitter
                • Jul 2008
                • 3342

                #1672
                Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                Originally posted by Jr.
                It's just a guide. I'm sure had this sheet been made 2 years ago.
                Yes, I'm aware that it's "just a guide". I was just letting some people know that Holland could be available in case they don't follow the Royals that closely, which not many people do.

                Even if it is "just a guide", the words "Unrealistic trade target" next to a players name tend to scare a lot of people off.
                Last edited by BA2929; 05-13-2014, 07:22 PM.
                "Baseball is the coolest sport because, at any moment, the catcher can stop the game and go tell the pitcher a secret" - Rob Fee

                Comment

                • ESexton18
                  Rookie
                  • Apr 2014
                  • 203

                  #1673
                  Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                  Originally posted by Redskinsfan26
                  No way is that worth it. One player is never worth five top prospects.
                  Haha I know... That'd be a ton of talent to give up... but I keep imagining my lineup with Stanton in it and how fun that would be.... so tempting.
                  Phillies | A's | Michigan State | Browns | Chelsea FC | Bruins

                  Comment

                  • Jr.
                    Playgirl Coverboy
                    • Feb 2003
                    • 19171

                    #1674
                    Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                    Originally posted by BA2929
                    Yes, I'm aware that it's "just a guide". I was just letting some people know that Holland could be available in case they don't follow the Royals that closely, which not many people do.

                    Even if it is "just a guide", the words "Unrealistic trade target" next to a players name tend to scare a lot of people off.
                    Relax, man. I was supporting your point
                    My favorite teams are better than your favorite teams

                    Watch me play video games

                    Comment

                    • dpower15
                      MVP
                      • Jul 2012
                      • 1029

                      #1675
                      Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                      Mets franchise. It's still May but I'm pretty much out of contention already. Seattle is leading their division by a couple games.

                      Ike Davis/Lucas Duda and Chris Young (having a great year hitting over .320 with 10 hrs and I'm only in May) for Franklin and Pryor? Young would step in as everyday CF for them and Davis or Duda could serve as either a DH or power bat off the bench for postseason play.


                      Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

                      Comment

                      • twl221
                        MVP
                        • Oct 2008
                        • 1045

                        #1676
                        Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                        So I'm starting a franchise with the Mariners (2013, OSFM final), and am looking to get some sabrmetric friendly hitters, Colby Rasmus is a target, what would I give up for him? Also looking for some generally good hitters that have good splits.
                        Kris Bryant doesn't hit homeruns, he destroys pitcher's dreams. #Bryantwatch

                        Comment

                        • mgcst5
                          Rookie
                          • Jun 2011
                          • 381

                          #1677
                          Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                          Originally posted by BA2929
                          Yes, I'm aware that it's "just a guide". I was just letting some people know that Holland could be available in case they don't follow the Royals that closely, which not many people do.

                          Even if it is "just a guide", the words "Unrealistic trade target" next to a players name tend to scare a lot of people off.

                          Anyone could be had for the right price but there are some players that are more realistic acquisitions and Holland is not one of them as long as the Royals think they can contend.

                          Comment

                          • AC
                            Win the East
                            • Sep 2010
                            • 14951

                            #1678
                            Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                            Originally posted by Redskinsfan26
                            No way is that worth it. One player is never worth five top prospects.
                            Disagree. There are some, and Stanton is one.
                            "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

                            Comment

                            • og236
                              MVP
                              • Mar 2013
                              • 1116

                              #1679
                              Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                              Originally posted by ACMilan99
                              Disagree. There are some, and Stanton is one.

                              Clayton Kershaw, Mike Trout, & more Lol agree on Stanton though


                              Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                              Comment

                              • AC
                                Win the East
                                • Sep 2010
                                • 14951

                                #1680
                                Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                                Originally posted by og236
                                Clayton Kershaw, Mike Trout, & more Lol agree on Stanton though


                                Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
                                It's an interesting list.

                                Kershaw, Trout, Strasburg, Felix, Harper, McCutchen, probably some more too. Hmm.
                                "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

                                Comment

                                Working...