MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • AC
    Win the East
    • Sep 2010
    • 14951

    #4096
    Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

    Originally posted by moth to a flame
    Starling is a prospect. He's aloud to play badly. And like WTNY said, Guzman is a replacement player. 69 OVR D Pot. Those are a dime a dozen. HRs are irrelevant.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Why is he allowed to play badly? Minor league numbers are extremely predictive of major league numbers. If the dude sucks in the minors, he sucks in the minors. And you're just gonna dismiss Guzman's home runs? How many 35 home run hitters are there? From 2008 to 2013, an average of 9.2 players hit 35 home runs or more. Of the 7814 player seasons from 2008-2013, 46 seasons included 35 home runs or more. That's 0.5%. I'd call that very relevant and anything but dime a dozen.

    all numbers courtesy the Lahman database and my slowly improving SQL skills
    "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

    Comment

    • moth to a flame
      Rookie
      • Apr 2012
      • 237

      #4097
      Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

      I think you're overstating how predictive minor league numbers are.

      Also, it's irrelevant due to the small sample size. Guzman could have just had a hot start. His past shows no signs of being a slugger like that. Something real GMs would consider.

      I have Don Kelly batting .400 after one-plus month. It's not relevant to his trade value. IMO.



      Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
      Nebraska Cornhuskers Detroit Tigers San Francisco 49ers Detroit Red Wings Syracuse Orange New York Knicks

      Comment

      • AC
        Win the East
        • Sep 2010
        • 14951

        #4098
        Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

        Originally posted by moth to a flame
        I think you're overstating how predictive minor league numbers are.

        Also, it's irrelevant due to the small sample size. Guzman could have just had a hot start. His past shows no signs of being a slugger like that. Something real GMs would consider.

        I have Don Kelly batting .400 after one-plus month. It's not relevant to his trade value. IMO.



        Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
        I don't think I'm overstating it. I read somewhere that the predictive value, or correlation coefficient r^2, was over 0.7, which means that minor league numbers explain 70% of a player's major league numbers. That's extremely important.

        And it isn't a very small sample size. ND is over halfway done his season. That means that Guzman probably has near 400 plate appearances, assuming he's seen an average amount of playing time (4.3 PA/G I think). That's enough for seasonal stats to stabilize and be indicative of RoS performance. It's been much more than a month. At this point, KC is loading up for a playoff run.
        "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

        Comment

        • moth to a flame
          Rookie
          • Apr 2012
          • 237

          #4099
          Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

          Originally posted by AC
          I don't think I'm overstating it. I read somewhere that the predictive value, or correlation coefficient r^2, was over 0.7, which means that minor league numbers explain 70% of a player's major league numbers. That's extremely important.



          And it isn't a very small sample size. ND is over halfway done his season. That means that Guzman probably has near 400 plate appearances, assuming he's seen an average amount of playing time (4.3 PA/G I think). That's enough for seasonal stats to stabilize and be indicative of RoS performance. It's been much more than a month. At this point, KC is loading up for a playoff run.


          While 400 PAs is certainly enough for power numbers, I'd just have to disagree on the trade. But, I'd very much like to read up on minor league stats and the correlation, if you could remember where you'd seen that. That sounds interesting.


          Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
          Nebraska Cornhuskers Detroit Tigers San Francisco 49ers Detroit Red Wings Syracuse Orange New York Knicks

          Comment

          • AC
            Win the East
            • Sep 2010
            • 14951

            #4100
            Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

            Originally posted by moth to a flame
            While 400 PAs is certainly enough for power numbers, I'd just have to disagree on the trade. But, I'd very much like to read up on minor league stats and the correlation, if you could remember where you'd seen that. That sounds interesting.


            Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
            I've been trying to remember lately, funny that it should come up. I'll PM you if I can find something.
            "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

            Comment

            • WaitTilNextYear
              Go Cubs Go
              • Mar 2013
              • 16830

              #4101
              Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

              Originally posted by moth to a flame
              I can't believe an organization's top ten prospect went for Jesus Guzman. Even if he is failing to live up to expectations.


              Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
              Originally posted by moth to a flame
              Starling is a prospect. He's aloud to play badly. And like WTNY said, Guzman is a replacement player. 69 OVR D Pot. Those are a dime a dozen. HRs are irrelevant.


              Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
              I agree with your assessment here. But the trade is already done and you can tell the OP at least did it in good faith. It's not as though he, for example....offered his two worst MLB veterans for Byron Buxton and just called it a day. This Guzman/Starling deal is at least in the solar system of fairness if not closely orbiting the sun. Starling still has a pretty good chance of busting out as well. The bigger issue for me was not necessarily the value, but what the heck would KC do with Jesus Guzman? lol
              Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines

              Comment

              • AC
                Win the East
                • Sep 2010
                • 14951

                #4102
                Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                Originally posted by WaitTilNextYear
                I agree with your assessment here. But the trade is already done and you can tell the OP at least did it in good faith. It's not as though he, for example....offered his two worst MLB veterans for Byron Buxton and just called it a day. This Guzman/Starling deal is at least in the solar system of fairness if not closely orbiting the sun. Starling still has a pretty good chance of busting out as well. The bigger issue for me was not necessarily the value, but what the heck would KC do with Jesus Guzman? lol
                Slot him at 3B for a playoff run while bringing a big bat over Moose was my thought process.
                "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

                Comment

                • NDAlum
                  ND
                  • Jun 2010
                  • 11453

                  #4103
                  Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                  Originally posted by WaitTilNextYear
                  Guzman/Starling trade is decently fair, but might be overestimating decent stats on a replacement-level player like Guzman. Also you have to consider what would KC actually do with Guzman while having Hosmer, Butler, and Gordon already.

                  No feelings either way on the Toronto deal.
                  Appreciate the feedback. I'm in Year 2 and Butler was signed by Philly in the off-season. Their other options were: Brett Wallace (AAA), Kevin Kouzmanoff (MLB), Justin Maxwell (MLB).

                  Based on the circumstances I'm happy with it and think it helps the Royals as Guzman can be their DH and fill in at four positions when guys need a day off. Also in a lineup with a bunch of lefty hitters he can provide a solid bat vs LHP.

                  Just caught up on moth to a flame's post. I can see that point of view where Starling might be a bit much for Guzman. I do believe this is where you see a guy's name and say "well he isn't any good" just because of his name just as you could see a guy's name and over value him. In the sim season Guzman hit .265 with 23 HR's and 84 RBI. Remember this is year #2 of my franchise as I simmed the first season.

                  KC has a clear need for a bat in their lineup. Some team stats after adding Guzman:

                  11th in runs
                  T-27th in Home Runs *They were 30th before the trade, they clearly need some pop*
                  12th in SLG%

                  I think I absolutely cashed in on the maximum value for Guzman at this point. That was 100% my goal.

                  Royals are 50-41 at this point which is 6.5 games better than the Indians. They have the 2nd best record in the AL and they need a hot bat to put into their lineup. Their offense clearly needs it.

                  Does this test past the real life eye test? Heck no Guzman is struggling IRL and Starling was a higher pick. In this franchise it makes sense based on what is going on. KC is in "win now" mode this year.

                  To me it makes sense but I could see how it doesn't make sense to somebody else.
                  Last edited by NDAlum; 06-28-2014, 09:24 PM.
                  SOS Madden League (PS4) | League Archives
                  SOS Crew Bowl III & VIII Champs

                  Atlanta Braves Fantasy Draft Franchise | Google Docs History
                  NL East Champs 5x | WS Champion 1x (2020)

                  Comment

                  • WaitTilNextYear
                    Go Cubs Go
                    • Mar 2013
                    • 16830

                    #4104
                    Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                    Originally posted by NDAlum
                    Appreciate the feedback. I'm in Year 2 and Butler was signed by Philly in the off-season. Their other options were: Brett Wallace (AAA), Kevin Kouzmanoff (MLB), Justin Maxwell (MLB).

                    Based on the circumstances I'm happy with it and think it helps the Royals as Guzman can be their DH and fill in at four positions when guys need a day off. Also in a lineup with a bunch of lefty hitters he can provide a solid bat vs LHP.

                    Just caught up on moth to a flame's post. I can see that point of view where Starling might be a bit much for Guzman. I do believe this is where you see a guy's name and say "well he isn't any good" just because of his name just as you could see a guy's name and over value him. In the sim season Guzman hit .265 with 23 HR's and 84 RBI. Remember this is year #2 of my franchise as I simmed the first season.

                    KC has a clear need for a bat in their lineup. Some team stats after adding Guzman:

                    11th in runs
                    T-27th in Home Runs *They were 30th before the trade, they clearly need some pop*
                    12th in SLG%

                    I think I absolutely cashed in on the maximum value for Guzman at this point. That was 100% my goal.

                    Royals are 50-41 at this point which is 6.5 games better than the Indians. They have the 2nd best record in the AL and they need a hot bat to put into their lineup. Their offense clearly needs it.

                    Does this test past the real life eye test? Heck no Guzman is struggling IRL and Starling was a higher pick. In this franchise it makes sense based on what is going on. KC is in "win now" mode this year.

                    To me it makes sense but I could see how it doesn't make sense to somebody else.
                    Welp...Thanks for the clarification though I hate seeing an NL team sign a DH. I guess nothing RAJ does would really surprise me.

                    But, I think with giving Guzman a place to play everyday makes this a more realistic deal than if Butler were there. I sure wouldn't think of playing Guzman at the hot corner.

                    Only issue I see with you having simmed a season is Guzman was not a young player to begin with, but is now what 31 or 32?

                    Will be interesting to see how he does for KC if you keep an eye on him. Also interesting to see how you plan on fitting Bubba into your OF going forward.
                    Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines

                    Comment

                    • NDAlum
                      ND
                      • Jun 2010
                      • 11453

                      #4105
                      Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                      Originally posted by WaitTilNextYear
                      Welp...Thanks for the clarification though I hate seeing an NL team sign a DH. I guess nothing RAJ does would really surprise me.

                      But, I think with giving Guzman a place to play everyday makes this a more realistic deal than if Butler were there. I sure wouldn't think of playing Guzman at the hot corner.

                      Only issue I see with you having simmed a season is Guzman was not a young player to begin with, but is now what 31 or 32?

                      Will be interesting to see how he does for KC if you keep an eye on him. Also interesting to see how you plan on fitting Bubba into your OF going forward.
                      Guzman is 30
                      Starling is 22

                      I'm definitely going to keep an eye on Guzman. I'm going to put Bubba in AAA the rest of the season. If he progresses I'll give him a shot next year to play.
                      SOS Madden League (PS4) | League Archives
                      SOS Crew Bowl III & VIII Champs

                      Atlanta Braves Fantasy Draft Franchise | Google Docs History
                      NL East Champs 5x | WS Champion 1x (2020)

                      Comment

                      • guayo10
                        Rookie
                        • Apr 2013
                        • 311

                        #4106
                        Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                        Scratched the Cubs idea with trading the farm away since I've found one of my older chises with them. Still early (May 19th, playing all the games at all levels). I'm out of the race as I'm currently 13-30. Pen has been a mess thus far starters have pitched well, their win and losses have been atrocious though. I'm going to keep on playing this one, not making any trades till the All Star game or around there, but one that came to mind was this one (Big trade):

                        Spoiler


                        Here's my reasoning (part 1)
                        Spoiler


                        Further dissecting of the trade

                        Spoiler


                        Scenarios where this would work in my mind:

                        Spoiler


                        Just thinking ahead as Samardzija won't be coming back and I'd like to package him with Castro or Rizzo for a bigger haul.

                        Realistic? Probably not but it helps all teams imo. Is every team getting fair value back? Should the Cubs get more back, are they getting more than enough back? Are the Dodgers giving up more than they're getting back? Are the M's silently stealing the trade? Yes/no, would appreciate some feedback. Not moving pieces till July so I've got time to think of more moves or a way to move Castro/Rizzo + Samardzija. Also obviously going for fairness and not really realism. Although I can see the M's adding bats to help out Robbie, to the point of trading pitching away? Idk. Ha.
                        Last edited by guayo10; 06-28-2014, 09:57 PM.

                        Comment

                        • WaitTilNextYear
                          Go Cubs Go
                          • Mar 2013
                          • 16830

                          #4107
                          Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                          Originally posted by guayo10
                          Scratched the Cubs idea with trading the farm away since I've found one of my older chises with them. Still early (May 19th, playing all the games at all levels). I'm out of the race as I'm currently 13-30. Pen has been a mess thus far starters have pitched well, their win and losses have been atrocious though. I'm going to keep on playing this one, not making any trades till the All Star game or around there, but one that came to mind was this one (Big trade):

                          Spoiler


                          Here's my reasoning (part 1)
                          Spoiler


                          Further dissecting of the trade

                          Spoiler


                          Scenarios where this would work in my mind:

                          Spoiler


                          Just thinking ahead as Samardzija won't be coming back and I'd like to package him with Castro or Rizzo for a bigger haul.

                          Realistic? Probably not but it helps all teams imo. Is every team getting fair value back? Should the Cubs get more back, are they getting more than enough back? Are the Dodgers giving up more than they're getting back? Are the M's silently stealing the trade? Yes/no, would appreciate some feedback. Not moving pieces till July so I've got time to think of more moves or a way to move Castro/Rizzo + Samardzija. Also obviously going for fairness and not really realism. Although I can see the M's adding bats to help out Robbie, to the point of trading pitching away? Idk. Ha.
                          Realism score = 0.

                          Would not recommend.
                          Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines

                          Comment

                          • AC
                            Win the East
                            • Sep 2010
                            • 14951

                            #4108
                            Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                            I can't analyze a trade I can't even wrap my head around. I have limits, lol. I'll just say pass on it.
                            "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

                            Comment

                            • CameRoN0407
                              It's a New England Thing
                              • Oct 2012
                              • 3328

                              #4109
                              MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                              Originally posted by guayo10
                              Cubs get SP Julio Urias, SP Taijuan Walker, SS Dee Gordon, OF Joc Pederson, SP Luiz Gohara

                              Dodgers get SP Jeff Samardzija, SS Starlin Castro, SP Hisashi Iwakuma, OF Stefen Romero, OF Dustin Ackley, C/1B Jesus Montero, RP Pedro Strop, SP Danny Hulten

                              Mariners get 1B Anthony Rizzo, 3B Corey Seager, SP Zach Lee, CF Matt Kemp (Could switch for Andre Ethier/Carl Crawford and make the trade smaller), SP Chad Billingsley, OF Jacob Scavuzzo, SP Travis Wood

                              Holy crap. I don't know where to start. I really pray you are not too high on realism. I don't see why Seattle would trade practically their whole team for 3 MLB guys, a reliever, and 2 prospects. also don't see why Dodgers would want pitching, and a DH who is struggling to hit at league average, while giving up their whole farm.

                              doesn't make any sense.
                              Last edited by CameRoN0407; 06-28-2014, 10:37 PM.
                              Red Sox: 2018 World Series Champions!!!
                              Patriots: 2018 Super Bowl Champions!!!

                              Team USA
                              Red Sox
                              Patriots
                              Celtics
                              Bruins

                              Comment

                              • Bull_Market
                                Pro
                                • Jul 2012
                                • 618

                                #4110
                                Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                                Originally posted by guayo10
                                Scratched the Cubs idea with trading the farm away since I've found one of my older chises with them. Still early (May 19th, playing all the games at all levels). I'm out of the race as I'm currently 13-30. Pen has been a mess thus far starters have pitched well, their win and losses have been atrocious though. I'm going to keep on playing this one, not making any trades till the All Star game or around there, but one that came to mind was this one (Big trade):

                                Spoiler


                                Here's my reasoning (part 1)
                                Spoiler


                                Further dissecting of the trade

                                Spoiler


                                Scenarios where this would work in my mind:

                                Spoiler


                                Just thinking ahead as Samardzija won't be coming back and I'd like to package him with Castro or Rizzo for a bigger haul.

                                Realistic? Probably not but it helps all teams imo. Is every team getting fair value back? Should the Cubs get more back, are they getting more than enough back? Are the Dodgers giving up more than they're getting back? Are the M's silently stealing the trade? Yes/no, would appreciate some feedback. Not moving pieces till July so I've got time to think of more moves or a way to move Castro/Rizzo + Samardzija. Also obviously going for fairness and not really realism. Although I can see the M's adding bats to help out Robbie, to the point of trading pitching away? Idk. Ha.
                                Sorry, this made my head hurt, but hey, its your franchise. 3 team trades where each team is giving up more than a third of their roster is not realistic or fair no matter how you try to justify it.
                                #HellaBandz
                                In Gunna I Trust

                                Comment

                                Working...