MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

[WaitTilNextYear]

Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

Thanks!

OSFM is Operation Sports Full Minors?

What's the noticeable differences of those three?

Can't wait to start over.

The last 2 have pitch edits and re-rated SCEA players. The difference between the Willard and Totte ones are that Totte's rosters have the opening day rosters whereas Willard's were current in real time as of early June. If you play through and make deals, injuries, and roster moves based on when they happened in real life, you'd be best off with Totte's. If you want more current rosters and do not want to do 2 months worth of transactions yourself, go with Willard's. Each has it's own thread in the PS3 roster section that you can read on for more info.

[AC]

Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

But Glasnow's potential is a Low A if I'm not mistaken. He has risen tremendously on the prospect boards, and is a piece Pittsburgh wants to save for a big name. At least put him as unrealistic.

Lol what's the big deal with Glasnow? He's obviously very good but his stock hasn't changed at all. He's still striking guys out and walking an unacceptable amount of guys. Will that change? Probably. I think he'll be very good. But why has his stock changed now? Cause of a low ERA? He still has a 3.56 SIERA. He'll be very good but I have no idea where this rising stock is coming from.

I'm not AC, but I think you could probably get another small piece back with that.

The Phillies would be getting two top 50 prospects (Pompey + Norris) and another in the top 100 (Sanchez). If the Jays throw in a high C, I think that should be fair.

Jays would need cash to be eaten in that deal. So Pompey + Norris + Sanchez + Robson + Romero + Happ for Hamels + Utley is probably the furthest we could go. However, Chase Utley is unwilling to waive his NTC to come to Toronto.

[BlueJays09]

Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

Colon requires a High B, Young a High C, and Murphy a Low B
Headley requires a Mid B/Mid B/High C, Kennedy a Mid B and Low B

What are 2 potential packages the Jays would have to give for these packages...mainly the Mets package

[xandere313]

Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

At the Deadline in the second season with Cubs, trying to make a final push, I decided to nix the deal for Stanton I had asked about here before because giving up 3 to 4 of my top guys was too much, however I still feel like I could use a big hitter.I still have all of the Cubs big prospects (Baez, Russell, Almora) except Soler and Villanueva, and Bryant is untouchable as he is raking in the bigs.

My question is would it be realistic to get Mark Trumbo from the DBacks? They are 9 back in the west and 12 back in WC. He's hitting .270 with 34 HRs. I'd like to not trade Baez if possible but just curious if he can be had what would be good for him.

[AC]

Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

Colon requires a High B, Young a High C, and Murphy a Low B
Headley requires a Mid B/Mid B/High C, Kennedy a Mid B and Low B

What are 2 potential packages the Jays would have to give for these packages...mainly the Mets package

I'm sorry, but I just don't see a world in which Colon is more valuable than Dan Murphy. Totte, do you want to send me the spreadsheet, or whatever you have of it, and I'll correct the values?

--

Anyway, to OP's problem, for the Mets:

Colon = Robson + DeJong
Murphy = Pompey + Lugo + Burns.
Young = Robson
Headley = Nolin + DeJong
Kenney = Pompey + Smith Jr + Nay.

[kmoser]

Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

At the Deadline in the second season with Cubs, trying to make a final push, I decided to nix the deal for Stanton I had asked about here before because giving up 3 to 4 of my top guys was too much, however I still feel like I could use a big hitter.I still have all of the Cubs big prospects (Baez, Russell, Almora) except Soler and Villanueva, and Bryant is untouchable as he is raking in the bigs.



My question is would it be realistic to get Mark Trumbo from the DBacks? They are 9 back in the west and 12 back in WC. He's hitting .270 with 34 HRs. I'd like to not trade Baez if possible but just curious if he can be had what would be good for him.

It won't take a top prospect to get Trumbo. He is doing good though so maybe 2 mid B's.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[bobbyb9827]

Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

I want to try to move Francisco Cervelli so I don't have to let him walk in the off-season is there any market for him or should i just let him walk in free agency lol

[HadlerT]

Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

I want to try to move Francisco Cervelli so I don't have to let him walk in the off-season is there any market for him or should i just let him walk in free agency lol

It depends on who is contending for a playoff spot and needs a catcher. Blue Jays come to mind. But they're in the same division.

[AC]

Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

Erik Kratz > Cervelli. Jays aren't interested.

[BlueJays09]

Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

I'm sorry, but I just don't see a world in which Colon is more valuable than Dan Murphy. Totte, do you want to send me the spreadsheet, or whatever you have of it, and I'll correct the values?



--



Anyway, to OP's problem, for the Mets:



Colon = Robson + DeJong

Murphy = Pompey + Lugo + Burns.

Young = Robson

Headley = Nolin + DeJong

Kenney = Pompey + Smith Jr + Nay.

Thanks AC. What could the jays get for Rasmus? Looking for mlb ready players likely OF with contact, RP


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[CameRoN0407]

Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

Lol what's the big deal with Glasnow? He's obviously very good but his stock hasn't changed at all. He's still striking guys out and walking an unacceptable amount of guys. Will that change? Probably. I think he'll be very good. But why has his stock changed now? Cause of a low ERA? He still has a 3.56 SIERA. He'll be very good but I have no idea where this rising stock is coming from.

It's not what I believe should be a rise in stock. I always thought of Glasnow being higher than just a High B. I figured at least a Low A, and a B of some sort.

[AC]

Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

It's not what I believe should be a rise in stock.

Cam, I think you talk yourself into circles sometimes.

As justification for him being valued higher:

He has risen tremendously on the prospect boards

[KBLover]

Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

In my Marlins franchise, I'm thinking about trying to find some good hitting prospects to trade for (going for fair possibilities over "perfect" realism since this all becomes fantasy after a while) instead of dealing the one should-be-awesome hitter we have (Stanton).

I have a LOT of good-performing pitching prospects in the system with B potential with Feliz climbing to an "A" and some of the others getting those good reports from the Farm Director which mean potential increases. Some of the notables that I'm looking at shopping (I don't think any of these guys are on the spreadsheet that I have):

-SP Adam Conley (AAA, 70/B, 23 years old, 87 Velocity, already near/at MLB quality in HR/9 and H/9).

-SP Anthony Desclafani (just up to MLB, 69/B, 23, plus MLB level velocity and movement, solid at H/9)

-SP Michael Feliz (AAA, flying up the system, 65/A, 20, 91 velocity - hits 98 when I tried him in a MiLB game, 67 K/9, mid 50's in other /9's, has work to do but has done nothing but succeed and potential is at "A" now, part of me doesn't want to deal him as he looks like Guerrieri for me last year, a kid that shot up and never looked back)

-SP Trevor Williams (AA, 63/B with potential increases, 21, solid pitches, 60/76/63 pitch ratings, 57 H/9)

-SP Jose Urena (AA, 64/B another that's gotten a potential increase, 22, coming out of nowhere, velocity starting to climb into the 80's along with his BB/9 at 60. Still has rough edges, though)


Any thoughts one some young hitting prospects/major leaguers that would be fair, or any idea on how to value these guys in terms of what's on the spreadsheet and then I can do my own work? (I just have no idea how the values are determined)

[CameRoN0407]

Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

Cam, I think you talk yourself into circles sometimes.

As justification for him being valued higher:

That was just in addition to what I believed at first. Glasnow has not only risen (which, again, is not my main reason), but he was really good before, and was rated as a low A in OSFM (main reason. Not 100% sure if he is though, so if he's not, I'll agree to the given value). I figured he would be worth at least his own value.

[Xcavs31x]

Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

[QUOTE=WaitTilNextYear;2046397014]

I'm not a fan. It's sort of rare to see intra-division trade. It's even more rare for big rivals (Red Sox-Yankees, Cubs-Cards, Dodgers-Giants) to do business. And it's microscopically rare for these rivals to deal significant pieces when they do make deals. I could imagine near riots in the bay area if this deal happened. Colletti would have to protect his neck


In response to this. I understand the reasoning. Idk I still feel the giants would accept a solid pitching prospect for a struggling 3rd baseman. Especially since they are gonna have pitching to replace soon