MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • AC
    Win the East
    • Sep 2010
    • 14951

    #5341
    Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

    Originally posted by WaitTilNextYear
    1. I don't see 1 happening. Not saying Severino is not good, it's just that Arismendy is better and more advanced. Like kmac mentioned above, looke like you are trying to get Arismendy come hell or high water. I'd just suggest going for a 2-team deal and not overcomplicating with 3 teams. It's not impossible to get him with Blue Jays spects, but prospect-prospect trades are less common and you might be holding out on the spects that you would need to give up.
    It just seems like a very good fit. Oh well.

    Originally posted by WTNY
    2. If you do the Russell deal, it would be highly unrealistic for the A's to deal Robertson also. He's the reason they felt they could deal Addison. Plus, I would really like an explanation of this "I will eat cash" scenario since I don't see how you can do that without the ability to edit contracts. How you plan to do dat?
    Answered the contracts thing below. And I'd figure that if they got a guy like Reyes heavily discounted they'd deal him now as he'd be able to step in immediately and help them go very far in the playoffs.

    Originally posted by WTNY
    3. A pitching prospect or Alen Hanson
    Not Bell + Hanson like kmac said?

    Originally posted by WTNY
    4. I don't see this as an option with Machado/Hardy/Schoop
    Schoop is pretty bad imo.

    Originally posted by WTNY
    5. Any prospect other than Lindor.
    Thing is, I don't really like anyone else lol. Think they'd deal Santana? I'd definitely be interested in that. He was on the table for a Price deal a while ago along with another really good piece that I momentarily forget. I could eat some cash and take on the Swisher contract.

    Originally posted by WTNY
    Again, eating money...like, how? I would love to know how to do this if it is possible.
    My idea right now.

    1. Release the player.
    2. Turn waivers on manual.
    3. No one claims him.
    4. Sign him to the new team at a discounted rate.
    5. Trade the players to your team.

    Dunno how much cash that would eat though.
    "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

    Comment

    • CameRoN0407
      It's a New England Thing
      • Oct 2012
      • 3328

      #5342
      Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

      Originally posted by ESexton18
      I'm approaching the deadline in my franchise as mentioned, now that I figured out I won't be going along with the real life MLB deadline here's some ideas I'm thinking of for trades. Apologize for the long post I'm about to put but I do value your guys opinions to keep things realistic and fair.

      Standings July 20th:
      Spoiler


      I've identified clear sellers in the Phillies, Marlins, Cubs, Rockies, Giants Orioles, and White Sox. There are clear buyers like the Dodgers and other big market teams and teams that are in the race but I don't feel comfortable making big moves with like Houston and Minnesota. All trades up until this weekend in real life have been made. Here are my big trade ideas I'd appreciate feedback on:

      Phillies and Dodgers:
      Spoiler


      Looks like your not getting enough back. That is a Hamels alone type of deal.

      Phillies and Red Sox
      Spoiler


      No, we would not trade Owens and Swihart for Lee. We don't have a serious need for him, and if at all we would trade them for Hamels instead.

      Giants and Blue Jays:
      Spoiler


      I think overpay for TOR.

      Orioles and Tigers:
      Spoiler


      Detroit still thinks pretty highly of Iglesias and his defense.

      Orioles and Mariners:
      Spoiler


      Not a bad deal.

      Phillies and Yankees:
      Spoiler


      Yankees overpay.

      I'm also considering dealing CarGo because the Rockies are in dire straits financial in the OSFM roster with him and Tulo's salary. I would think CarGo more likely to be dealt than Tulo. The Padres could use a top of the rotation starter as well.

      There's some smaller deals I'll make on my own, but I would love feedback on these bigger deals from anyone who is willing to read through all that haha. Thanks guys.
      Responses in bold.
      Red Sox: 2018 World Series Champions!!!
      Patriots: 2018 Super Bowl Champions!!!

      Team USA
      Red Sox
      Patriots
      Celtics
      Bruins

      Comment

      • WaitTilNextYear
        Go Cubs Go
        • Mar 2013
        • 16830

        #5343
        Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

        Originally posted by AC
        Not Bell + Hanson like kmac said?

        Possibly, but only if PIT is really running away with the division and has their eyes on a World Series AND Jordy Mercer is giving them nothing.

        Schoop is pretty bad imo.

        Schoop is pretty young imo.

        Thing is, I don't really like anyone else lol. Think they'd deal Santana? I'd definitely be interested in that. He was on the table for a Price deal a while ago along with another really good piece that I momentarily forget. I could eat some cash and take on the Swisher contract.

        No. I don't see Santana (or Brantley) coming back.

        My idea right now.

        1. Release the player.
        2. Turn waivers on manual.
        3. No one claims him.
        4. Sign him to the new team at a discounted rate.
        5. Trade the players to your team.

        Dunno how much cash that would eat though.
        It might work. You may have to edit attributes first to make the new deal much different from the current deal. For example, edit Reyes down to a scrub, release him, and sign him cheap. Then edit one of your own guys to a stud, release him, and sign for beaucoup Canadian bucks. It's a lot of work, but probably not that bad if used rarely.
        Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines

        Comment

        • AC
          Win the East
          • Sep 2010
          • 14951

          #5344
          Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

          Originally posted by CameRoN0407
          Responses in bold.
          @ESexton

          -I actually don't mind the Hamels deal. Remember, no salary is being eaten and those are BIG contracts.
          -Fair deal for Lee
          -Lol @ Pompey should be an A but I already stated my thoughts on this.
          -Yeah, not enough for Hardy, but it's a good landing spot. Solid concept. Thompson+ would work.
          -Not enough for Cruz.
          -Gross overpayment by the Yankees.
          "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

          Comment

          • AC
            Win the East
            • Sep 2010
            • 14951

            #5345
            Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

            Originally posted by WaitTilNextYear
            It might work. You may have to edit attributes first to make the new deal much different from the current deal. For example, edit Reyes down to a scrub, release him, and sign him cheap. Then edit one of your own guys to a stud, release him, and sign for beaucoup Canadian bucks. It's a lot of work, but probably not that bad if used rarely.
            Ah, good catch. Excellent french. Beaucoup Canadian bucks is catchy. Tu parles francais? I sure as **** don't lol. It's not that much work. I think I could definitely do that. Now it's just a matter of figuring out how much cash releasing a guy eats.
            "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

            Comment

            • CameRoN0407
              It's a New England Thing
              • Oct 2012
              • 3328

              #5346
              Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

              Originally posted by AC
              @ESexton

              -I actually don't mind the Hamels deal. Remember, no salary is being eaten and those are BIG contracts.
              -Fair deal for Lee
              -Lol @ Pompey should be an A but I already stated my thoughts on this.
              -Yeah, not enough for Hardy, but it's a good landing spot. Solid concept. Thompson+ would work.
              -Not enough for Cruz.
              -Gross overpayment by the Yankees.
              Yea, I looked at his stats more in depth and edited that.
              Red Sox: 2018 World Series Champions!!!
              Patriots: 2018 Super Bowl Champions!!!

              Team USA
              Red Sox
              Patriots
              Celtics
              Bruins

              Comment

              • nl15
                Pro
                • Jul 2010
                • 841

                #5347
                Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                I'm at the all star break and need some help with these trades. My ideas so far are:

                Alexi Ramirez (.233, 4 HR, 31 RBI) to OAK (Lowrie injured)
                Jason Kubel (.285, 16 HR, 64 RBI) to CIN
                Marlon Byrd (.286, 16 HR, 56 RBI) to LAA or SEA or DET
                Daniel Hudson (10-6 3.93 ERA) to TOR
                Cole Hamels (5-11 2.94 ERA) to BOS or STL or BAL
                Tim Hudson (4-10 5.91 ERA) to PIT
                Madden 25 - Steelers
                Year 1 - 10-6 Lost in WC Round
                Year 2 - 14-2 Lost in AFC Championship
                Year 3 - 11-5

                Comment

                • k_mac
                  MVP
                  • Mar 2011
                  • 2059

                  #5348
                  Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                  Originally posted by AC
                  Not Bell + Hanson like kmac said?
                  I meant Hanson or Bell, but I don't think it's inconceivable to get both of them. If you feel bad for taking their best position prospects, throw in one of your own that you're willing to part with. Someone that you view as a high C or a very low B.

                  Reyes + $ + _____ for Hanson + Bell + Clay Holmes

                  That's not a bad deal at all, in my opinion. The Pirates would definitely have to be in the thick of things though.

                  Comment

                  • AC
                    Win the East
                    • Sep 2010
                    • 14951

                    #5349
                    Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                    Originally posted by nl15
                    I'm at the all star break and need some help with these trades. My ideas so far are:

                    Alexi Ramirez (.233, 4 HR, 31 RBI) to OAK (Lowrie injured)
                    Jason Kubel (.285, 16 HR, 64 RBI) to CIN
                    Marlon Byrd (.286, 16 HR, 56 RBI) to LAA or SEA or DET
                    Daniel Hudson (10-6 3.93 ERA) to TOR
                    Cole Hamels (5-11 2.94 ERA) to BOS or STL or BAL
                    Tim Hudson (4-10 5.91 ERA) to PIT
                    For Renato Nunez/Michael Ynoa
                    For Yorman Rodriguez
                    For (Angels have nooothinggggg), Pike, or Moya/Leyba
                    For Nay/Tirado
                    For Betts/Barnes/Cecchini, Martinez/Piscotty/Ramsey, or Gausman/Schoop/Cisco
                    "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

                    Comment

                    • WaitTilNextYear
                      Go Cubs Go
                      • Mar 2013
                      • 16830

                      #5350
                      Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                      Originally posted by AC
                      Ah, good catch. Excellent french. Beaucoup Canadian bucks is catchy. Tu parles francais? I sure as **** don't lol. It's not that much work. I think I could definitely do that. Now it's just a matter of figuring out how much cash releasing a guy eats.
                      Oui, je parle francais un peu. Mais, on besoin seulement le 'Google Translate'
                      Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines

                      Comment

                      • AC
                        Win the East
                        • Sep 2010
                        • 14951

                        #5351
                        Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                        Originally posted by WaitTilNextYear
                        Oui, je parle francais un peu. Mais, on besoin seulement le 'Google Translate'
                        I can tell, lol.

                        WTNY, you guys are pretty anxious to get rid of EJax's contract right?
                        "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

                        Comment

                        • k_mac
                          MVP
                          • Mar 2011
                          • 2059

                          #5352
                          Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                          Originally posted by AC
                          I can tell, lol.

                          WTNY, you guys are pretty anxious to get rid of EJax's contract right?
                          I'll speak for him..

                          I wouldn't be sad to part with Edwin or his contract at all.

                          Comment

                          • WaitTilNextYear
                            Go Cubs Go
                            • Mar 2013
                            • 16830

                            #5353
                            Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                            Originally posted by AC
                            I can tell, lol.

                            WTNY, you guys are pretty anxious to get rid of EJax's contract right?
                            Anxious is not the word I'd use. I'd use opportunistic. No chance in hell Theo/Hoyer uses prospects to help move him. But if a contender wants him and wants us to pay some salary AND we get a decent spect, then maybe. Definitely not a desperate or anxious situation with our payroll being at rock bottom anyway.
                            Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines

                            Comment

                            • KBLover
                              Hall Of Fame
                              • Aug 2009
                              • 12172

                              #5354
                              Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                              Originally posted by WaitTilNextYear
                              As long as you're ok with 100% unrealistic. No chance the Twins trade Sano away for prospects in a realistic sense. You can probably scrape together enough value to make a relatively fair deal. But, it reeks of unrealism imo.
                              I don't mind unrealism. Thank goodness because the Mets being 12 games better than the Marlins and Harvey having a 1.59 ERA (wtf, his real ERA is, literally, more than twice that) would otherwise drive me up a wall for starters. Not to mention me actually wanting to make the Marlins better instead of .400 fodder for another decade.

                              As long as the transaction is fair to me paying slightly too much, I don't mind at least considering it. Just don't want to rip the CPU teams off, especially for high-end talent/prospects.


                              Originally posted by hampshirestags
                              KBlover - J. Marisnick/R. Johnson or grab your glove. It doesn't matter this year, we're building for 2-3 years to make a run.

                              Side note: would somebody come in here and ask for help for the O's to win? Every franchise I see come through has the O's losing. They are leading the division, you'd think 1 chise has them winning!!
                              True, was thinking of using Marisnick in some fashion. He's got a decent glove on him and probably can train him into a defensive specialist with an okay bat in the meantime.

                              Sadly, the O's are struggling in my franchise. They have a .460 record but are just 7 1/2 out for a wild card spot, so a good second half could turn things around.
                              Last edited by KBLover; 07-20-2014, 03:26 PM.
                              "Some people call it butterflies, but to him, it probably feels like pterodactyls in his stomach." --Plesac in MLB18

                              Comment

                              • WaitTilNextYear
                                Go Cubs Go
                                • Mar 2013
                                • 16830

                                #5355
                                Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                                Originally posted by AC
                                I can tell, lol.
                                Actually google translate did a terrible job. I just typed in English what I wanted to say in French and the translator couldn't even handle an easy word like "seulement," which just means "only." I guess we are not being replaced by our machine overlords any time soon.

                                And just to keep on topic: broken trade logic.
                                Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines

                                Comment

                                Working...