MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • AC
    Win the East
    • Sep 2010
    • 14951

    #6721
    Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

    What do you guys think the value is on a 4 win Jose Reyes? $12.7M surplus value.
    "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

    Comment

    • hampshirestags
      Pro
      • May 2014
      • 500

      #6722
      Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

      Originally posted by AC
      What do you guys think the value is on a 4 win Jose Reyes? $12.7M surplus value.
      If his contract ended with the '14 season, we would be talking about the premier FA position player. Since it doesn't, and now the balloon payments are due, the odds we will see any surplus value from him in the future are very low. Nobody wants to buy the used Ferrari for retail. We've said it before, he's movable, I just don't see how TOR moves him and doesn't lose out.

      However, take your newly found $12mm and offset the rest of his deal, take on some other bad contract and throw in R. Alomar's suite at the Centre and we might have something. Everything I see tells me the deal starts going the other way in '15.

      And I would consider myself a J.Reyes fan...just not a TOR fan!
      "for love of the game" - B. Chapel

      Comment

      • AC
        Win the East
        • Sep 2010
        • 14951

        #6723
        Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

        For the record, in game he's getting paid similar amounts for the rest of his contract that along with inflation will keep the contract pretty even.

        And you didn't really answer the question at all, lol.
        "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

        Comment

        • ESexton18
          Rookie
          • Apr 2014
          • 203

          #6724
          Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

          Would the Orioles give up one of Bundy, Harvey or Gausman in a Cole Hamels deal?

          It's late June, Gausman is in the MLB rotation with a 4.52 ERA, I'm not sure they'd move him since he's already in the MLB.

          Bundy has a 2.09 ERA in AA, Harvey has a 4.36 ERA in AAA. The Orioles are 1.0 game back in the division at the moment but no one in the rotation has an ERA under 4. Hamels has a 2.63 ERA and is having his usual stellar season.

          I'm actually only a game back in the division even though I have no hitting haha not sure I can keep that up. I'll probably wait a little to make a move to see where things stand but I'm just throwing this out there.
          Phillies | A's | Michigan State | Browns | Chelsea FC | Bruins

          Comment

          • hampshirestags
            Pro
            • May 2014
            • 500

            #6725
            Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

            Originally posted by AC
            For the record, in game he's getting paid similar amounts for the rest of his contract that along with inflation will keep the contract pretty even.

            And you didn't really answer the question at all, lol.
            He is a career 3 WAR, a 4 year (values rounded) at this point doesn't move the needle given current age and contract value (in-game contract value is 'made up' and not relevant imo, perhaps someone else will have a wider view on the topic).

            Simple answer, his value is static.
            "for love of the game" - B. Chapel

            Comment

            • hampshirestags
              Pro
              • May 2014
              • 500

              #6726
              Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

              Originally posted by ESexton18
              Would the Orioles give up one of Bundy, Harvey or Gausman in a Cole Hamels deal?

              It's late June, Gausman is in the MLB rotation with a 4.52 ERA, I'm not sure they'd move him since he's already in the MLB.

              Bundy has a 2.09 ERA in AA, Harvey has a 4.36 ERA in AAA. The Orioles are 1.0 game back in the division at the moment but no one in the rotation has an ERA under 4. Hamels has a 2.63 ERA and is having his usual stellar season.

              I'm actually only a game back in the division even though I have no hitting haha not sure I can keep that up. I'll probably wait a little to make a move to see where things stand but I'm just throwing this out there.
              Yes. D.Bundy would be most likely to be moved.
              "for love of the game" - B. Chapel

              Comment

              • torpidbeaver
                Pro
                • Mar 2010
                • 636

                #6727
                Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                Can I ask how you guys handle trades in your leagues (assuming you use 30-team control)? I'm looking around at some of my opponents and wondering if I should make a trade or two for them, but I sorta promised myself I wouldn't get that granular.

                For instance, the Braves are pulling into the All-Star Break 2 games back of the Nationals with some serious injuries. There's the starting pitching pre-season injuries, and then they lost Jason Heyward to a torn Hamstring. They've got a semi-platoon of Derrick Mitchel and Cedric Hunter (60/64 OVR, D POT).

                There are plenty of other teams in contention with serious holes. Do you sit back and hope the computer deals with it? Or do you step in?

                More disturbingly, the computer doesn't seem to be adjusting lineups to deal with the new, crappy replacements. So Tulo's 60s-level replacement call-up is still batting 3rd in the lineup.

                Comment

                • BC392
                  Rookie
                  • Oct 2011
                  • 6

                  #6728
                  Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                  Ok, Just looking for suggestions with a few questions..

                  Question 1- OBVIOUSLY trading for cubs slugger Baez might be a little unrealistic. But in real life circumstance...would the cubs do a XB/Pitching prospect for him? XB has struggled but he was a higher ranked prospect coming into the year.

                  Also worthy of noting, Theo is the one who signed XB while he isn't the one who draft baez. Not to say he prefers XB but that's prob worthy of noting anyways.

                  Question 2..Whats a realistic trade for Stanton? 2 Of Mookie/Owens/Swihart? More? less?

                  Question 3- What could the sox expect in a trade for cespedes/Nap/Craig etc in terms of prospects? 1 A potential player? 2?


                  Thanks in advance!
                  Last edited by BC392; 08-24-2014, 10:52 PM.

                  Comment

                  • AC
                    Win the East
                    • Sep 2010
                    • 14951

                    #6729
                    Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                    The Cubs should 8000% do that, big overpay
                    "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

                    Comment

                    • torpidbeaver
                      Pro
                      • Mar 2010
                      • 636

                      #6730
                      Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                      Boston (48-38, 0 GB) Offers:
                      SP Henry Owens (21 Years, 73 OVR, A POT, AAA Stat Line: 0-2, 5.06, 10k/6bb)
                      SP Trey Ball (19 Years, 59 OVR, A POT, Single-A Stat Line: 4-6, 6.10, 67k/36bb)

                      Colorado (39-49, 8 GB) Offers:
                      RF Michael Cuddyer (34 Years, 85 OVR, B POT, $7.4 M/1 Year, MLB Stat Line: .280/.360/.419)

                      Boston is doing well, despite losing Papi to a dislocated ankle and Bogaerts to a fractured arm, while Victorino is gone with a shattered wrist for at least another 2 months. They've currently got 3B/Util Ryan Roberts (33 Years, 74 OVR, C POT, MLB Stat Line: .267/.346/.345) playing RF, where I guess he's doing a serviceable job.

                      FWIW, Boston's RFs are cursed. Bryce Brentz, Daniel Nava, and Keury De La Cruz are all on the DL (on top of the aforementioned Victorino).

                      Colorado's out of the game, basically, after they lost Tulo and his backup for a long stretch.

                      As far as CPU-initiated trades go, this one interests me.

                      Comment

                      • BC392
                        Rookie
                        • Oct 2011
                        • 6

                        #6731
                        Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                        Originally posted by torpidbeaver
                        Boston (48-38, 0 GB) Offers:
                        SP Henry Owens (21 Years, 73 OVR, A POT, AAA Stat Line: 0-2, 5.06, 10k/6bb)
                        SP Trey Ball (19 Years, 59 OVR, A POT, Single-A Stat Line: 4-6, 6.10, 67k/36bb)

                        Colorado (39-49, 8 GB) Offers:
                        RF Michael Cuddyer (34 Years, 85 OVR, B POT, $7.4 M/1 Year, MLB Stat Line: .280/.360/.419)

                        Boston is doing well, despite losing Papi to a dislocated ankle and Bogaerts to a fractured arm, while Victorino is gone with a shattered wrist for at least another 2 months. They've currently got 3B/Util Ryan Roberts (33 Years, 74 OVR, C POT, MLB Stat Line: .267/.346/.345) playing RF, where I guess he's doing a serviceable job.

                        FWIW, Boston's RFs are cursed. Bryce Brentz, Daniel Nava, and Keury De La Cruz are all on the DL (on top of the aforementioned Victorino).

                        Colorado's out of the game, basically, after they lost Tulo and his backup for a long stretch.

                        As far as CPU-initiated trades go, this one interests me.

                        I think right now the only type of players the sox would trade owens for is a young star. Part of a Stanton/Heyward deal.


                        Owens is a top 25 or so prospect I believe.


                        That would be a steal for colo, and than some.

                        Comment

                        • AC
                          Win the East
                          • Sep 2010
                          • 14951

                          #6732
                          Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                          I sense the thread is about to see it's 3rd or 20th discussion about whether the "Henry Owens will be dealt for nothing short of Stanton" opinion is valid.

                          it's soooooooooooooooo not imo
                          "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

                          Comment

                          • WaitTilNextYear
                            Go Cubs Go
                            • Mar 2013
                            • 16830

                            #6733
                            Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                            Originally posted by AC
                            What do you guys think the value is on a 4 win Jose Reyes? $12.7M surplus value.
                            I think you should cut off debate and trade him already. No matter how many 3-team ideas or salary eating ideas you come up with, you aren't getting Corey Seager or his ilk. Just move on down to the next tier and hammer it out.

                            Originally posted by ESexton18
                            Would the Orioles give up one of Bundy, Harvey or Gausman in a Cole Hamels deal?
                            Yes, I could see any of them dealt in this deal. But only one. I don't see a clear most likely of the trio.

                            Originally posted by BC392
                            Ok, Just looking for suggestions with a few questions..

                            Question 1- OBVIOUSLY trading for cubs slugger Baez might be a little unrealistic. But in real life circumstance...would the cubs do a XB/Pitching prospect for him? XB has struggled but he was a higher ranked prospect coming into the year.

                            Also worthy of noting, Theo is the one who signed XB while he isn't the one who draft baez. Not to say he prefers XB but that's prob worthy of noting anyways.

                            Question 2..Whats a realistic trade for Stanton? 2 Of Mookie/Owens/Swihart? More? less?

                            Question 3- What could the sox expect in a trade for cespedes/Nap/Craig etc in terms of prospects? 1 A potential player? 2?


                            Thanks in advance!
                            1. No. The Cubs don't trade Baez's deficiencies for Bogaerts' deficiencies. It makes no sense to trade SS for SS when the Cubs are already rolling in SS's. Unless the SP prospect is top notch (Owens, maybe Ranaudo), which I'm sure you wouldn't do.

                            2. There's no such thing as a realistic trade for Stanton right now. He's balling and MIA needs someone to put 5k butts in the seats nightly. It would take a bit more for a fair deal.

                            3. Why? OK so you're clearing a spot for Stanton? I can't really come up with anything realistic since Craig and Cespedes just got there. Napoli, it depends on his stats.

                            Originally posted by torpidbeaver
                            Boston (48-38, 0 GB) Offers:
                            SP Henry Owens (21 Years, 73 OVR, A POT, AAA Stat Line: 0-2, 5.06, 10k/6bb)
                            SP Trey Ball (19 Years, 59 OVR, A POT, Single-A Stat Line: 4-6, 6.10, 67k/36bb)

                            Colorado (39-49, 8 GB) Offers:
                            RF Michael Cuddyer (34 Years, 85 OVR, B POT, $7.4 M/1 Year, MLB Stat Line: .280/.360/.419)

                            Boston is doing well, despite losing Papi to a dislocated ankle and Bogaerts to a fractured arm, while Victorino is gone with a shattered wrist for at least another 2 months. They've currently got 3B/Util Ryan Roberts (33 Years, 74 OVR, C POT, MLB Stat Line: .267/.346/.345) playing RF, where I guess he's doing a serviceable job.

                            FWIW, Boston's RFs are cursed. Bryce Brentz, Daniel Nava, and Keury De La Cruz are all on the DL (on top of the aforementioned Victorino).

                            Colorado's out of the game, basically, after they lost Tulo and his backup for a long stretch.

                            As far as CPU-initiated trades go, this one interests me.
                            Is Ben Cherington also clearing out his office in preparation for getting fired over this deal? Wow. Cuddy does not have that type of value, not close. I'm not saying Owens is unmovable, but 2 A POT SPs for Cuddy? That's absurd, even if Ball is only an "A". I think Ball, by himself, is slightly too much for a Cudder rental and I don't like Ball much.

                            Originally posted by AC
                            I sense the thread is about to see it's 3rd or 20th discussion about whether the "Henry Owens will be dealt for nothing short of Stanton" opinion is valid.

                            it's soooooooooooooooo not imo
                            What's with the invisible ink, AC? lol.

                            Owens can be traded, but it's for more than a Michael Cuddyer rental and less than a Stanton. Somewhere in the middle lies the truth.
                            Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines

                            Comment

                            • sink4ever
                              MVP
                              • Dec 2004
                              • 1153

                              #6734
                              Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                              As I mentioned in a previous post, I'm in July with my A's/Padres franchise. I've already gotten some feedback on my potential Padres trades (thanks Deuce!), so now I'd like to toss out some possibilities for the A's. The A's are in contention, 2 GB Seattle in the West and 1st for the WC.

                              There are three main players I'm interested in, but I'm not sure if any of them make sense for a mid-season trade or if I should wait until the off-season. Here are the players I'm willing to possibly trade:

                              Spoiler


                              And here are the players I'm interested in :

                              Spoiler


                              Any ideas? I would really like to get both Swisher and Eaton and would be willing to overpay a bit, but I know I may only have the pieces for one of them. Thanks!

                              Comment

                              • AC
                                Win the East
                                • Sep 2010
                                • 14951

                                #6735
                                Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                                Originally posted by WaitTilNextYear
                                I think you should cut off debate and trade him already. No matter how many 3-team ideas or salary eating ideas you come up with, you aren't getting Corey Seager or his ilk. Just move on down to the next tier and hammer it out.
                                Seager hit like .260/.320 in the minors and isn't even playing shortstop so I'm pretty sure I could if I wanted but seriously, all I'm asking for is a hard value to work with here.
                                "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

                                Comment

                                Working...