MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • CBoller1331
    It Appears I Blue Myself
    • Dec 2013
    • 3082

    #6781
    Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

    Originally posted by 3fiddy
    I was wanting Urias. Thinking they have no pitching lol and this give them a good young starter now. Zimmers stats are very good but since he's hurt IRL id like him to go on living a good career on a different team. But mlb jus put up an article like Urias is better than Kershaw in the minor leagues lol. Today at that haha. I jus liked his story lefty , facing minor leaguers at 16, out of Mexico. Kinda like Jaime Garcia.

    Do you think I should add someone ? Jus want to be fair. Urias is 67 overall prolly eta 2 yrs prolly. Considering it's May 13th this year and next for Urias in minors.
    I don't know why you would trade a nearly MLB ready prospect off a guy who won't be ready for two or three years...
    Chicago Cubs
    Michigan Wolverines

    Thanks Peyton. #18

    Comment

    • AC
      Win the East
      • Sep 2010
      • 14951

      #6782
      Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

      Makes no sense for either team imo
      "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

      Comment

      • 3fiddy
        Rookie
        • Apr 2012
        • 392

        #6783
        Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

        I did a fantasy draft and I'm comfortable with the amount of Mlb starters I have. Since they have 2 scrubs prolly looking for jobs next year & #s 2 and 3 at that. I could trade them an mlb ready pitcher for a project to give my roster better balance and preparing for the future.
        I play MLB exclusively with my cousin. Usually looking for info on Franchises. We played minor league baseball as 9-10 YOs on the Zephyrs.

        Comment

        • ESexton18
          Rookie
          • Apr 2014
          • 203

          #6784
          Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

          How would a player like Giancarlo Stanton's value change in a walk year?

          For example, he's hitting .265 with 24 HR's in June in my chise. The Marlins are terrible so I am not going to have him resign with Miami this offseason. That puts him on the trade block.

          Obviously he's still worth quite a bit, but is he still worth spreadsheet value if he is a rental? Just something I was thinking about.
          Phillies | A's | Michigan State | Browns | Chelsea FC | Bruins

          Comment

          • kmoser
            MVP
            • Jul 2012
            • 1398

            #6785
            Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

            Originally posted by ESexton18
            How would a player like Giancarlo Stanton's value change in a walk year?



            For example, he's hitting .265 with 24 HR's in June in my chise. The Marlins are terrible so I am not going to have him resign with Miami this offseason. That puts him on the trade block.



            Obviously he's still worth quite a bit, but is he still worth spreadsheet value if he is a rental? Just something I was thinking about.

            The Marlins would still want a ton, even if he was a rental.


            Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

            Comment

            • AC
              Win the East
              • Sep 2010
              • 14951

              #6786
              Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

              A **** ton for sure, but not a historic package.
              "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

              Comment

              • ESexton18
                Rookie
                • Apr 2014
                • 203

                #6787
                Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                So something like two A level prospects and a B level do you think?
                Phillies | A's | Michigan State | Browns | Chelsea FC | Bruins

                Comment

                • nbcards
                  Rookie
                  • Mar 2011
                  • 334

                  #6788
                  Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                  I'm at the deadline in my first season and after my first few proposed trades were a bit too unfair I tried to even it up more. I posted my trades into google sheets so its nice and formatted and easy to read.

                  https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...it?usp=sharing

                  Once again looking for fairness even though no trade is going to be fair for both in my opinion. Not looking for realistic.

                  Thanks
                  St. Louis Cardinals
                  Chicago Bulls
                  Indianapolis Colts
                  Northern Illinois Huskies

                  Comment

                  • WaitTilNextYear
                    Go Cubs Go
                    • Mar 2013
                    • 16830

                    #6789
                    Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                    Originally posted by ESexton18
                    So something like two A level prospects and a B level do you think?
                    More cowbell.

                    Originally posted by nbcards
                    I'm at the deadline in my first season and after my first few proposed trades were a bit too unfair I tried to even it up more. I posted my trades into google sheets so its nice and formatted and easy to read.

                    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...it?usp=sharing

                    Once again looking for fairness even though no trade is going to be fair for both in my opinion. Not looking for realistic.

                    Thanks
                    It's an improvement. But, there are still some odd things with deals being padded with random replacement level players. I don't see any reason for Koyie Hill in the Utley trade as an example. It's almost like roster moves for the sake of moving players.

                    I'm not a fan of the Papelbon, Aviles, Simon, and Cuddyer deals. Not enough value for any of these. Most of the rest seem fathomable.
                    Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines

                    Comment

                    • nbcards
                      Rookie
                      • Mar 2011
                      • 334

                      #6790
                      Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                      Originally posted by WaitTilNextYear
                      More cowbell.



                      It's an improvement. But, there are still some odd things with deals being padded with random replacement level players. I don't see any reason for Koyie Hill in the Utley trade as an example. It's almost like roster moves for the sake of moving players.

                      I'm not a fan of the Papelbon, Aviles, Simon, and Cuddyer deals. Not enough value for any of these. Most of the rest seem fathomable.
                      Koyie Hill is in there because I needed another player to trade to make it a 3 for 3. For the other 4 what would you suggest I add?
                      St. Louis Cardinals
                      Chicago Bulls
                      Indianapolis Colts
                      Northern Illinois Huskies

                      Comment

                      • WaitTilNextYear
                        Go Cubs Go
                        • Mar 2013
                        • 16830

                        #6791
                        Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                        Originally posted by nbcards
                        Koyie Hill is in there because I needed another player to trade to make it a 3 for 3. For the other 4 what would you suggest I add?
                        Give the Phillies Logan Watkins and Paul Blackburn for Papelbon.

                        Kevin Ziomek for Aviles.

                        Bubba Starling and Christian Binford for Simon.

                        Dan Vogelbach and Dillon Maples for Cuddyer
                        Last edited by WaitTilNextYear; 08-29-2014, 09:12 PM.
                        Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines

                        Comment

                        • AC
                          Win the East
                          • Sep 2010
                          • 14951

                          #6792
                          Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                          I think that's a bit much for Simon is my only gripe. Idk, I like Bubba and Binford.
                          "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

                          Comment

                          • sink4ever
                            MVP
                            • Dec 2004
                            • 1153

                            #6793
                            Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                            Originally posted by sink4ever
                            As I mentioned in a previous post, I'm in July with my A's/Padres franchise. I've already gotten some feedback on my potential Padres trades (thanks Deuce!), so now I'd like to toss out some possibilities for the A's. The A's are in contention, 2 GB Seattle in the West and 1st for the WC.

                            There are three main players I'm interested in, but I'm not sure if any of them make sense for a mid-season trade or if I should wait until the off-season. Here are the players I'm willing to possibly trade:

                            Spoiler


                            And here are the players I'm interested in :

                            Spoiler


                            Any ideas? I would really like to get both Swisher and Eaton and would be willing to overpay a bit, but I know I may only have the pieces for one of them. Thanks!
                            Sorry if I'm doing this too soon, I'll only bump this once. If anyone has any thoughts, that's cool. If not, that's cool too. Thanks.

                            Comment

                            • DavidTheGreat20
                              MVP
                              • Apr 2012
                              • 1445

                              #6794
                              Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                              So in Year 1 in my dynasty, Joe Nathan is having a season that is the exact opposite of how he's playing IRL.

                              0-1, 31 saves, 0.94 ERA

                              I'm hoping to ship him out this offseason, as I'm probably moving Joakim Soria to closer (Or maybe someone from my farm). What can I get for Nathan? A mid-level prospect?

                              Any thoughts?
                              Wolverines vs. The World || DavidTheGreat's Michigan Wolverines (NCAA14)
                              Season 1: 11-2 (Won Rose Bowl vs. Arizona)
                              Season 2: 0-0


                              Comment

                              • Totte
                                MVP
                                • Mar 2005
                                • 2919

                                #6795
                                Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                                Good numbers by Nathan but you won't get anything more than either a low B or two high C's from a contender
                                Former modder of "Ultimate Rosters" for MVP Baseball 2005.

                                Comment

                                Working...