MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hampshirestags
    Pro
    • May 2014
    • 500

    #6796
    Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

    Originally posted by sink4ever
    Sorry if I'm doing this too soon, I'll only bump this once. If anyone has any thoughts, that's cool. If not, that's cool too. Thanks.
    CHW is your best deal, CLE/SF wouldn't trade their power bats while winning.

    A couple of comments, 1) You have what you're looking to trade for in Olson, can you coach him up and have him ready for '15? (that way, no trade needed) ... 2) Other Lefty 1b that can be looked at Moreland (TEX), Jones (MIA), Loney (TB).
    "for love of the game" - B. Chapel

    Comment

    • sink4ever
      MVP
      • Dec 2004
      • 1153

      #6797
      Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

      Originally posted by hampshirestags
      CHW is your best deal, CLE/SF wouldn't trade their power bats while winning.

      A couple of comments, 1) You have what you're looking to trade for in Olson, can you coach him up and have him ready for '15? (that way, no trade needed) ... 2) Other Lefty 1b that can be looked at Moreland (TEX), Jones (MIA), Loney (TB).
      Thanks. Unfortunately Olson really sucks in my roster. Maybe I should find a newer roster and copy his ratings/potential over. Appreciate you pointing that out.

      Comment

      • AC
        Win the East
        • Sep 2010
        • 14951

        #6798
        Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

        So I screwed up my calculations for Reyes and now I'm done my season so I figured I'd lay it all out.

        Jose Reyes
        WAR 5.0
        wRC+ 116
        K% 12.53
        BB% 8.08
        Fld 3.6
        wOBA .339
        BSR .9
        BABIP .308
        ISO .148
        Triple Slash .285/.340/.433
        Surplus value $11.3M
        GP 153

        Can't really think of anything else relevant. The only shortstops who come close to him in overall production are Tulowitzki (25.7M) Hanley (26.1M expiring) and Hardy (8.0M expiring). Not even Starlin Castro holds a candle to him this year.

        I'm looking for the best pieces back possible, but 99% not pitchers as the main piece. An outfielder would be pretty cool. As I've said before, I've targeted guys like Calhoun+ or Marte+. Unfortunately, on either team, there isn't really much of a +. Calhoun put up a 3 win year and Marte put up a horrawful year.

        So what do you guys think I could get back? I wasn't thinking T50 prospect but now I kinda am. Reyes' numbers are pretty massive.

        So why am I trading him? Like I said, an outfielder would be cool. I have a lot of holes coming up. No definite 2B, no LF, no 1B/DH, no C. I need a player to fill one of those holes and the budget room to work with.

        Again, Calhoun+ and Marte+ both seem appealing. More so Calhoun. But I don't see very good secondary packages. The Rangers could work. Reyes/Andrus on the MIF, Profar to the OF, Rios to CF (Martin is awful). Dunno who I'd want back.

        Nationals maybe. LaRoche gone, Zimmerman to 1B, Rendon to 3B, Reyes/Des MIF. Mets have Tejada. He finally hit a HR!!!!!! Wouldn't mind d'Arnaud back although he was awful. That'd be fun. I dunno if the Cubs would deal Soler or Almora or Arismendy or someone, but they could move someone to the OF to make room (they were contenders this year and should be next year).

        Reds have a massive need with Cozart. One of their pitchers could be interesting. Maybe along with a meh Frazier. Dodgers will obviously have massive interest. Pederson is super interesting, or I could do Kemp++ (Kemp is awful).

        Contending teams:
        Spoiler


        Selling teams:
        Spoiler


        So yeah, this'll probably be my last post re: Reyes now that I have all the info. If you have any specific questions just ask. Thanks in advance.
        Last edited by AC; 08-30-2014, 10:27 PM.
        "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

        Comment

        • WaitTilNextYear
          Go Cubs Go
          • Mar 2013
          • 16830

          #6799
          Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

          Cubs are a definite no. They have no need for a SS.
          Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines

          Comment

          • hampshirestags
            Pro
            • May 2014
            • 500

            #6800
            Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

            Originally posted by AC
            So I screwed up my calculations for Reyes and now I'm done my season so I figured I'd lay it all out.

            Jose Reyes
            WAR 5.0
            wRC+ 116
            K% 12.53
            BB% 8.08
            Fld 3.6
            wOBA .339
            BSR .9
            BABIP .308
            ISO .148
            Triple Slash .285/.340/.433
            Surplus value $11.3M
            GP 153

            Can't really think of anything else relevant. The only shortstops who come close to him in overall production are Tulowitzki (25.7M) Hanley (26.1M expiring) and Hardy (8.0M expiring). Not even Starlin Castro holds a candle to him this year.

            I'm looking for the best pieces back possible, but 99% not pitchers as the main piece. An outfielder would be pretty cool. As I've said before, I've targeted guys like Calhoun+ or Marte+. Unfortunately, on either team, there isn't really much of a +. Calhoun put up a 3 win year and Marte put up a horrawful year.

            So what do you guys think I could get back? I wasn't thinking T50 prospect but now I kinda am. Reyes' numbers are pretty massive.

            So why am I trading him? Like I said, an outfielder would be cool. I have a lot of holes coming up. No definite 2B, no LF, no 1B/DH, no C. I need a player to fill one of those holes and the budget room to work with.

            Again, Calhoun+ and Marte+ both seem appealing. More so Calhoun. But I don't see very good secondary packages. The Rangers could work. Reyes/Andrus on the MIF, Profar to the OF, Rios to CF (Martin is awful). Dunno who I'd want back.

            Nationals maybe. LaRoche gone, Zimmerman to 1B, Rendon to 3B, Reyes/Des MIF. Mets have Tejada. He finally hit a HR!!!!!! Wouldn't mind d'Arnaud back although he was awful. That'd be fun. I dunno if the Cubs would deal Soler or Almora or Arismendy or someone, but they could move someone to the OF to make room (they were contenders this year and should be next year).

            Reds have a massive need with Cozart. One of their pitchers could be interesting. Maybe along with a meh Frazier. Dodgers will obviously have massive interest. Pederson is super interesting, or I could do Kemp++ (Kemp is awful).

            Contending teams:
            Spoiler


            Selling teams:
            Spoiler


            So yeah, this'll probably be my last post re: Reyes now that I have all the info. If you have any specific questions just ask. Thanks in advance.
            If this discussion goes beyond this post, I'm gonna need Kemp's slash from '14. You may be able to pull either A . Guerrero or A. Verdugo from an average Kemp (MVP a couple years ago, he shouldn't suck that bad) or 2 boom/bust arms from a below average performance.

            You have my deal from LAA. As I see it, NYY, WAS, CIN, STL (something with Holliday) along with the 2 LA teams are the bidders. I think one of us put Reyes in NYY a month or so ago?

            HOU, ARZ, CHC all could be players but you have to bring one of your arms to the table (Sanchez or Norris).

            Here is the thought I've had since we lasted chatted,...Tulo. I know, and I know...and yes, I know that too but...it's going to have to be a blockbuster, why not TOR?
            "for love of the game" - B. Chapel

            Comment

            • AC
              Win the East
              • Sep 2010
              • 14951

              #6801
              Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

              WTNY, you don't think the Cubs would jump at adding another 5 wins? Baez could move to RF pretty easy, or Castro (nice speed and arm), or Arismendy. Also, I had a dream the Jays acquired Schwarber which must be prophetic lol.

              I don't see the point in a Tulo/Reyes swap. It's a lateral move. Sure Tulo is better but he's more expensive. Once you get down to surplus value they're even.

              Kemp was pretty awful. I dunno, 1 WAR? Salaries go 17.8, 18.7, 19.6, 20.6, 21.6, 22.7. Just an awful, awful contract. Hm. Would they deal Ryu? Or would they do Kemp + Pederson? I might do that. That was a rumored Lester package and that was for a rental Lester, not a T3 SS coming off a 5 win season still locked up on what is now a very fair contract. Actually, I'm not sure if I'd do that lol.

              Dunno who on earth the Astros would realistically deal for Reyes and who on earth would make it worth it for me if I included a young arm (Sanchez 1.3 WAR in 20 innings, Norris top 20 prospect). The DBacks don't really have any assets to trade. I see these teams as the bidders and with who they'd deal:

              NYY: Ew. Pineda+Betances+Refsnyder? Ewww.
              WAS: Pitcher+? Fister/Gio were pretty bad.
              CIN: Cueto (3.5?) and Latos (4?) jump out. Bailey (3) and Chapman (1) are interesting too. Frazier (2?).
              STL: Piscotty+? I dunno.
              LAA: Calhoun+. Trouble is the +.
              LAD: Well, Kemp++. Pederson+. We know the drill. Ryu is interesting too.
              NYM: d'Arnaud+ just seems ... interesting.
              PIT: Yeah, Marte. .245/.285/.407. Really bad year. Also like Cole (2.5), Kingham, Glasnow, and Meadows.

              Ughhh.
              "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

              Comment

              • WaitTilNextYear
                Go Cubs Go
                • Mar 2013
                • 16830

                #6802
                Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                Originally posted by AC
                WTNY, you don't think the Cubs would jump at adding another 5 wins? Baez could move to RF pretty easy, or Castro (nice speed and arm), or Arismendy. Also, I had a dream the Jays acquired Schwarber which must be prophetic lol.
                Positive. No chance Theoyer has even a small interest in Reyes. It's anathema to everything they're doing in Chicago. They are not giving up core prospects for a 30/31 y/o speed and contact guy who happened to have a good year at a position they have no need at. I'd cross them off the list entirely if you are still looking for realism.
                Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines

                Comment

                • AC
                  Win the East
                  • Sep 2010
                  • 14951

                  #6803
                  Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                  Any thoughts on the rest of that?
                  "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

                  Comment

                  • Shock1011
                    Rookie
                    • Dec 2011
                    • 274

                    #6804
                    Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                    Originally posted by AC
                    So I screwed up my calculations for Reyes and now I'm done my season so I figured I'd lay it all out.
                    I see that the Brewers were contenders so I thought I'd throw in something that may be a bit out there I dunno.

                    Knowing your previous interest in Braun you could possibly work out a deal that would get you him and Segura. I'm sure in real life they would ask for a whole lot but if you were to give them Reyes + a pitcher it could be a pretty solid deal for both teams. I'd think that what you give them besides Reyes would all have to depend on how Segura is playing (and whether or not you see him as a fit) but I'd guess that MIL would prefer a pitcher over anything else.

                    Also this would be completely thrown out if Braun is playing at a Sub-Braun level.
                    | Brewers | Packers | Angels | Bucks | Badgers |

                    Comment

                    • AC
                      Win the East
                      • Sep 2010
                      • 14951

                      #6805
                      Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                      damndamndamn.gif

                      Daaaaaaaamn. I'm gonna be home in a sec so I'll check that out. Segura was pretty meh iirc. Gennett was a stud. I forget what Braun is like but Gomez and Davis have been phenomenal. Give me like 10 minutes and I'll either edit this post or if you respond before that I'll make a post with all the stats.

                      I'd also like to hear from others if they think it's realistic. It's a blockbuster but it's a win win for sure. From one steroid LF to another lol.
                      "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

                      Comment

                      • Shock1011
                        Rookie
                        • Dec 2011
                        • 274

                        #6806
                        Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                        Originally posted by AC
                        damndamndamn.gif

                        Daaaaaaaamn. I'm gonna be home in a sec so I'll check that out. Segura was pretty meh iirc. Gennett was a stud. I forget what Braun is like but Gomez and Davis have been phenomenal. Give me like 10 minutes and I'll either edit this post or if you respond before that I'll make a post with all the stats.

                        I'd also like to hear from others if they think it's realistic. It's a blockbuster but it's a win win for sure. From one steroid LF to another lol.
                        I really don't know about the realism aspect of the trade but I definitely think it's fair if you give Sanchez/Osuna/Stroman/Nolin+ back because I'd like to think the Brewers would at least be able to replace Braun's power with someone else since that's all they're really losing in this.
                        | Brewers | Packers | Angels | Bucks | Badgers |

                        Comment

                        • WaitTilNextYear
                          Go Cubs Go
                          • Mar 2013
                          • 16830

                          #6807
                          Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                          Originally posted by AC
                          Any thoughts on the rest of that?
                          I think I suggested a deal with the Reds a long while back. So, maybe you could get Latos. Word is they might not be able to keep Cueto and Latos both. I doubt you'd get close to getting your hands on Chapman or Cueto.

                          The Angels for Calhoun+ makes some sense.

                          To the Yankees for something around Severino + Murphy + another B. Problem is no one all that MLB ready aside from Murphy.

                          I'm not a fan of the Mets, Pirates, Cardinals, and Nationals as partners. I'm sure you could work something out with the Dodgers, but I don't think Reyes gets you into their top 3 prospects. You'd probably have to settle for Lee/Van Slyke/Guerrero/Gordon in addition to Kemp.
                          Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines

                          Comment

                          • AC
                            Win the East
                            • Sep 2010
                            • 14951

                            #6808
                            Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                            Originally posted by Shock1011
                            I really don't know about the realism aspect of the trade but I definitely think it's fair if you give Sanchez/Osuna/Stroman/Nolin+ back because I'd like to think the Brewers would at least be able to replace Braun's power with someone else since that's all they're really losing in this.
                            Braun's power is replaced by Khris Davis, who hit .270 with 29 homers. Segura was pretty awful offensively and defensively but he ran a lot (41 SB) fwiw. Not much. He was pretty bad. Braun hit .273/.327/.461 with 24 homers. He wasn't anything special. In game contract of 9.3/9.7/10.2/10.7/11.3/11.8/12.4. Strikeout rate was good but the walks were low. What do you think?

                            Originally posted by WaitTilNextYear
                            I think I suggested a deal with the Reds a long while back. So, maybe you could get Latos. Word is they might not be able to keep Cueto and Latos both. I doubt you'd get close to getting your hands on Chapman or Cueto.

                            The Angels for Calhoun+ makes some sense.

                            To the Yankees for something around Severino + Murphy + another B. Problem is no one all that MLB ready aside from Murphy.

                            I'm not a fan of the Mets, Pirates, Cardinals, and Nationals as partners. I'm sure you could work something out with the Dodgers, but I don't think Reyes gets you into their top 3 prospects. You'd probably have to settle for Lee/Van Slyke/Guerrero/Gordon in addition to Kemp.
                            Latos is who I like more so solid. 3.22 ERA in 33 games. 7.7 K/9, 3.4 FIP. Nice year. But he's going into a contract year. Think I could get more back since he's only a rental?

                            I dunno who + would be. They really don't have much to write home about lol. Literally no legitimate prospects. Like, I'm not being picky, they just don't have ... anyone.

                            Meeeh. Gross.

                            I think the Mets would be interested. They've shown interest in Tulo and Castro. So I won't rule them out. Think the Dodgers would deal Ryu?

                            What does everyone think of the Braun trade?
                            "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

                            Comment

                            • hampshirestags
                              Pro
                              • May 2014
                              • 500

                              #6809
                              Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                              I think you would have a lineup that resembles a men's slow pitch softball team.

                              You should add on a young arm though. At worst, Segura is an everyday SS with his glove and Braun is just off stealing the MVP from Kemp. That's worth Reyes +
                              "for love of the game" - B. Chapel

                              Comment

                              • AC
                                Win the East
                                • Sep 2010
                                • 14951

                                #6810
                                Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                                Originally posted by hampshirestags
                                I think you would have a lineup that resembles a men's slow pitch softball team.

                                You should add on a young arm though. At worst, Segura is an everyday SS with his glove and Braun is just off stealing the MVP from Kemp. That's worth Reyes +
                                Segura's glove is pretty bad man. He's been like the worst shortstop in the league IRL. And Braun's production is pretty far down.

                                The thing I'm most concerned with is realism.
                                "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

                                Comment

                                Working...