MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
-
Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Yeah, but there aren't many other prospects. League wide, they deserve more recognition imo. They're all top 30 prospects in my book. It'd be hard to justify trading Cliff Lee for ALL of them."Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
-
Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Oh yea definitely not all three for Lee even if the Phillies play every cent of Lee's contract. And I would agree with you that Urias and Seager need more attention but I think Pederson is getting enough attention due to the status of the Dodgers outfield.Comment
-
Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Ok so I'm gonna start up a mets franchise soon and I'm still working out which trades I'm going to make here's some of the trades I've been thinking about, any feedback is greatly appreciated
Jed Lowrie for Dillon Gee + Kevin Plawecki
Starlin Castro for Raphael Montero + Nimmo/Flores
JJ Hardy for Jon Niese
Michael Brantley for Jon Niese or Dillon Gee + Domingo Tapia
Cespedes for Montero + Niese + NimmoComment
-
Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Ok so I'm gonna start up a mets franchise soon and I'm still working out which trades I'm going to make here's some of the trades I've been thinking about, any feedback is greatly appreciated
Jed Lowrie for Dillon Gee + Kevin Plawecki
Starlin Castro for Raphael Montero + Nimmo/Flores
JJ Hardy for Jon Niese
Michael Brantley for Jon Niese or Dillon Gee + Domingo Tapia
Cespedes for Montero + Niese + Nimmo
I think the second trade makes the most sense for both teams & I would do itI don't like any of the other trades from the other team's perspective
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkComment
-
Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Any ideas on how to make some of the other trades work though?Comment
-
Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
First one is okay, second one is a big rip off in your favor, third is okay, fourth you're losing big time, fifth is a big rip off in your favor (all imo)."Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
-
Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Also what do you think would need to be added to make the trade for Castro work
Would Dominic Smith + Montero + Niese for Cespedes work or would I still need to add more
On a side not GO RAPTORSComment
-
Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Do you think Brantley for Gee straight up is fair or would I still be losing that trade?
Also what do you think would need to be added to make the trade for Castro work
Would Dominic Smith + Montero + Niese for Cespedes work or would I still need to add more
On a side not GO RAPTORS
Niese is a perfect target for Oakland. Smith is a solid piece too. Anyone else besides Montero?
GOOOOOOOO RAPS"Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
-
Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Or maybe wheeler + smith + Plawecki for them if that's not enoughComment
-
Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Hmm I'm a bit reluctant to but I think I'd be willing to part with wheeler but he seems pretty much the same value as cespedes if not more so so what about something along the lines of wheeler + Niese + Plawecki for Cespedes + Lowrie?
Or maybe wheeler + smith + Plawecki for them if that's not enough
Niese + Smith + Lagares/Davis/Duda/Montero for Cespedes is fair.
Wheeler for Cespedes is fair.
Wheeler + Murphy for Cespedes + Lowrie + Milone/Cook/something is also fair."Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
-
Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
I think you might be under valuing Montero a little he seems to be on a completely different level than the other players you mentioned as alternatives to him in terms of value imo, also Ike Davis is no longer a MetComment
-
Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Interesting I think I might just do that last deal you gave thanks
I think you might be under valuing Montero a little he seems to be on a completely different level than the other players you mentioned as alternatives to him in terms of value imo, also Ike Davis is no longer a Met
He's probably more valuable yeah but I was trying to think about the A's M/O with positional flexibility and defense-first. Montero totally works as a piece though, just think they'd like the other pieces too."Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
-
Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Sorry for the double post.
Padres fans, what do you think Chase Headley is worth? He's a rental and I'd be willing to deal Dickey for him and a prospect. Nobody else seems willing to deal for him and I'd like to get him as part of a trade for another guy I like too."Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
-
Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
I realize but I wasn't sure if you were going OD rosters or not.
He's probably more valuable yeah but I was trying to think about the A's M/O with positional flexibility and defense-first. Montero totally works as a piece though, just think they'd like the other pieces too.Comment
Comment