MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • grushcow
    Rookie
    • Feb 2008
    • 111

    #1906
    Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

    Originally posted by k_mac
    One of the Garcias in that system (Yeudy the pitcher or Willy the OF) could headline a package for Valbuena. Tarpley, Kingham, Keller, or Holmes (those guys are generally all low B or high C prospects, right?) should be a start if you want to look in another direction. If it takes more, it won't be that much.

    If you want to play Jaso at backstop, that's up to you. He's not great behind the plate but if the bat is what you want then that's a call you have to make. Cervelli hit pretty well last year.

    Re Jose Bautista: He hasn't played more than 3 games/year at 3B since like 2011, counting on him to play any kind of defense there day in and day out would be risky.
    Ya I was thinking Kingham. I'd rather hold onto Jaso and have another middle order bat anyway. I'll send them Kingham and a C. Thanks for the input.

    The other guy I'd like to target is Rowdy Tellez. Want a little more power in the minors and a Blue Jay to have in the wings. Was thinking one of the Garcias.
    Last edited by grushcow; 05-29-2016, 10:58 PM.

    Comment

    • AC
      Win the East
      • Sep 2010
      • 14951

      #1907
      Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

      Originally posted by WaitTilNextYear
      Please enlighten us!

      Are you just high on Reed? Or would there be a better alternative? I was just about to press "enter" on the deal when I checked back one last time, lol. An Astros fan even signed off on it, dang.

      Does Singleton + Martes + Kemp make more sense? Could I sweeten so that getting Reed is more palatable?
      I think I'm high on Reed and low on Ross. He's a hitting machine and we've seen these prospects do well lately (namely Bird and Goldy). Ross is an injury risk and not particularly controllable. I just don't think I would be doing anything around Ross/Reed if I was the Stros. Martes+Singleton/White + Kemp is totally fine by me, maybe with San Diego giving up a guy like Maurer too.
      "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

      Comment

      • holden57
        Rookie
        • May 2012
        • 66

        #1908
        Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

        Originally posted by k_mac
        One of the Garcias in that system (Yeudy the pitcher or Willy the OF) could headline a package for Valbuena. Tarpley, Kingham, Keller, or Holmes (those guys are generally all low B or high C prospects, right?) should be a start if you want to look in another direction. If it takes more, it won't be that much.

        If you want to play Jaso at backstop, that's up to you. He's not great behind the plate but if the bat is what you want then that's a call you have to make. Cervelli hit pretty well last year.

        Re Jose Bautista: He hasn't played more than 3 games/year at 3B since like 2011, counting on him to play any kind of defense there day in and day out would be risky.


        I can't really comment on trade returns, but Bautista at 3B is a no go. Only other position I can see him playing is 1B.

        Comment

        • WaitTilNextYear
          Go Cubs Go
          • Mar 2013
          • 16830

          #1909
          Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

          Originally posted by AC
          I think I'm high on Reed and low on Ross. He's a hitting machine and we've seen these prospects do well lately (namely Bird and Goldy). Ross is an injury risk and not particularly controllable. I just don't think I would be doing anything around Ross/Reed if I was the Stros. Martes+Singleton/White + Kemp is totally fine by me, maybe with San Diego giving up a guy like Maurer too.
          Are you suggesting tossing in Maurer (or similar RP) in addition to Derek Norris or instead of him?

          I am fine with not getting Reed; I feel like trades should hurt a bit and you shouldn't necessarily get everyone you want. Essential for realism, imo.
          Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines

          Comment

          • CBoller1331
            It Appears I Blue Myself
            • Dec 2013
            • 3082

            #1910
            Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

            Originally posted by WaitTilNextYear
            Are you suggesting tossing in Maurer (or similar RP) in addition to Derek Norris or instead of him?

            I am fine with not getting Reed; I feel like trades should hurt a bit and you shouldn't necessarily get everyone you want. Essential for realism, imo.
            Im not sure how available he would be, but what if you got Preston Tucker back instead of Reed? Id have to imagine he's not quite as highly touted as Reed is, and that would allow you to keep Myers at 1B....which would keep him on the field and off the DL (which i guess is a little irrelevant in the video game where everyone has relatively the same injury risk...).

            I guess the risk there is that theres a pretty good chance Tucker turns into nothing but a platoon guy vs righties. I don't know... just throwing that out there
            Chicago Cubs
            Michigan Wolverines

            Thanks Peyton. #18

            Comment

            • WaitTilNextYear
              Go Cubs Go
              • Mar 2013
              • 16830

              #1911
              Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

              Originally posted by CBoller1331
              Im not sure how available he would be, but what if you got Preston Tucker back instead of Reed? Id have to imagine he's not quite as highly touted as Reed is, and that would allow you to keep Myers at 1B....which would keep him on the field and off the DL (which i guess is a little irrelevant in the video game where everyone has relatively the same injury risk...).

              I guess the risk there is that theres a pretty good chance Tucker turns into nothing but a platoon guy vs righties. I don't know... just throwing that out there
              What about this...Last iteration? lol. I didn't expect there to be this much back and forth with this one, but I ain't complaining either.

              GIVE: Tyson Ross + Derek Norris + RP Jon Edwards (instead of Maurer)
              GET: Jon Singleton + Francis Martes + Preston Tucker

              Singleton would become my starting 1B, Myers would move to LF. Tucker would be a lefty bench bat and able to spell Kemp in RF and Myers in LF from time to time. Essentially Tucker would become my 4th OF and force a Jay/Upton platoon in CF. This also saves me from having 2 Kemps on 1 team. I feel like 1 might be enough.

              Even if they trade Preston Tucker, the Stros would still have Springer, Gomez, Marisnick, and Rasmus in the OF, with Gattis and Tony Kemp able to play LF as well. I upgrade a bit from Kemp to Tucker as a consolation for downgrading from A.J. Reed to Singleton. Thoughts? How valuable do the Astros consider Preston Tucker? Looking at FanGraphs, he's got a FV = 40, which ain't so great, with basically across the board average tools. He's been pretty abysmal in his brief MLB career to date. Willing to gamble.
              Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines

              Comment

              • rovert22044
                OCD Roster Editor
                • Dec 2010
                • 2509

                #1912
                Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

                Originally posted by WaitTilNextYear
                What about this...Last iteration? lol. I didn't expect there to be this much back and forth with this one, but I ain't complaining either.

                GIVE: Tyson Ross + Derek Norris + RP Jon Edwards (instead of Maurer)
                GET: Jon Singleton + Francis Martes + Preston Tucker

                Singleton would become my starting 1B, Myers would move to LF. Tucker would be a lefty bench bat and able to spell Kemp in RF and Myers in LF from time to time. Essentially Tucker would become my 4th OF and force a Jay/Upton platoon in CF. This also saves me from having 2 Kemps on 1 team. I feel like 1 might be enough.

                Even if they trade Preston Tucker, the Stros would still have Springer, Gomez, Marisnick, and Rasmus in the OF, with Gattis and Tony Kemp able to play LF as well. I upgrade a bit from Kemp to Tucker as a consolation for downgrading from A.J. Reed to Singleton. Thoughts? How valuable do the Astros consider Preston Tucker? Looking at FanGraphs, he's got a FV = 40, which ain't so great, with basically across the board average tools. He's been pretty abysmal in his brief MLB career to date. Willing to gamble.
                As an Astros fan, I feel like you'd be overpaying here. I think if you removed the 3rd player in the deal (Edwards/Maurer), I think that's fair. So essentially:

                GIVE: Tyson Ross + Derek Norris
                GET: Jon Singleton + Francis Martes + Preston Tucker

                Not that Edwards or Maurer particularly have much value, I just feel it's fair the way it is.

                Just my two cents, though. Lol
                Football Data Analyst @ Tracking Football
                Founder/CEO @ JUCOHub

                Comment

                • AC
                  Win the East
                  • Sep 2010
                  • 14951

                  #1913
                  Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

                  GIVE: Tyson Ross + Brandon Maurer
                  GET: Jon Singleton + Francis Martes + Preston Tucker
                  "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

                  Comment

                  • Tmizzle
                    Rookie
                    • Aug 2012
                    • 370

                    #1914
                    Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

                    Originally posted by AC
                    GIVE: Tyson Ross + Brandon Maurer
                    GET: Jon Singleton + Francis Martes + Preston Tucker
                    I would rather take Kemp over Tucker. Tucker does have some pop but Kemp brings speed, contact and versatility.
                    Follow my Twins franchise http://www.operationsports.com/Tmizzle/dynasty/

                    Comment

                    • WaitTilNextYear
                      Go Cubs Go
                      • Mar 2013
                      • 16830

                      #1915
                      Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

                      Originally posted by rovert22044
                      As an Astros fan, I feel like you'd be overpaying here. I think if you removed the 3rd player in the deal (Edwards/Maurer), I think that's fair. So essentially:

                      GIVE: Tyson Ross + Derek Norris
                      GET: Jon Singleton + Francis Martes + Preston Tucker

                      Not that Edwards or Maurer particularly have much value, I just feel it's fair the way it is.

                      Just my two cents, though. Lol
                      Originally posted by AC
                      GIVE: Tyson Ross + Brandon Maurer
                      GET: Jon Singleton + Francis Martes + Preston Tucker
                      Originally posted by Tmizzle
                      I would rather take Kemp over Tucker. Tucker does have some pop but Kemp brings speed, contact and versatility.
                      Thanks for all the input!

                      I decided to keep Norris in the deal over Maurer because... (1) I am trying to thin out my 3-headed, righty catching monster in Norris/Bethancourt/Hedges and, (2) I feel the Stros could use a righty platoon partner for Castro more than another 7th inning guy. I also prefer Preston Tucker to TONY Kemp just because of the LH power, which I really only have Brett Wallace and now Singleton providing otherwise. Tucker can DH for me and play a passable sub to Myers/MATT Kemp in the corners, while TONY Kemp doesn't give me much more than Spangenberg at 2B or Upton/Jay in the OF. I also decided to keep Edwards in there so Houston gets a pen arm and it's a 3 for 3 deal. If I did a 2 for 3 deal without Edwards, I'd need to release someone to stay at 90-man anyway.

                      For what it's worth, I homered with Singleton on the very first pitch he saw off Felix Hernandez in Spring Training, lol. So far, so good.
                      Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines

                      Comment

                      • Tmizzle
                        Rookie
                        • Aug 2012
                        • 370

                        #1916
                        Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

                        So in my franchise with the Twins, the Oriols traded Kevin Gausman for Brendan Rodgers. I let the trade go through as I believe it was a very fair deal. The Orioles get a Shortstop of the future with a aging Hardy at SS who just so happens to be hurt right now and the Rockies get an potential ACE pitcher back in the deal. As an Orioles fan myself, I wouldn't mind this deal in real life as well. Whats your guys thought on the deal?
                        Follow my Twins franchise http://www.operationsports.com/Tmizzle/dynasty/

                        Comment

                        • nyqu1st
                          Rookie
                          • Apr 2015
                          • 153

                          #1917
                          Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

                          Originally posted by Tmizzle
                          So in my franchise with the Twins, the Oriols traded Kevin Gausman for Brendan Rodgers. I let the trade go through as I believe it was a very fair deal. The Orioles get a Shortstop of the future with a aging Hardy at SS who just so happens to be hurt right now and the Rockies get an potential ACE pitcher back in the deal. As an Orioles fan myself, I wouldn't mind this deal in real life as well. Whats your guys thought on the deal?
                          Depends. Are the O's out of it? If they are contending I don't see them dealing their best pitcher for a spect. If the O's do this trade (their best pitcher for a SS who won't be at the ML level for a few years) then they have to believe they aren't competing for a WS atm. Would they be in this mindset after just re-signing Chris Davis to a fat contract?

                          Rockies pitching staff is abysmal and it looks like Story might be their shortstop of the future so Rodgers might be blocked off unless they can find a different position for him. Gausman has team control until 2020 I believe? That works out well on the Rockies part because they aren't immediate contenders with this trade. Don't know how high they are on Rodgers but he's only 19 and raking in A ball. Neither player is for certain. I'd probably deny the trade. After this last off-season it looked like the O's are in win now mode so I would not do this trade just because I don't think Baltimore is ready to start the fire sale.
                          DETROIT

                          Comment

                          • Tmizzle
                            Rookie
                            • Aug 2012
                            • 370

                            #1918
                            Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

                            Originally posted by nyqu1st
                            Depends. Are the O's out of it? If they are contending I don't see them dealing their best pitcher for a spect. If the O's do this trade (their best pitcher for a SS who won't be at the ML level for a few years) then they have to believe they aren't competing for a WS atm. Would they be in this mindset after just re-signing Chris Davis to a fat contract?

                            Rockies pitching staff is abysmal and it looks like Story might be their shortstop of the future so Rodgers might be blocked off unless they can find a different position for him. Gausman has team control until 2020 I believe? That works out well on the Rockies part because they aren't immediate contenders with this trade. Don't know how high they are on Rodgers but he's only 19 and raking in A ball. Neither player is for certain. I'd probably deny the trade. After this last off-season it looked like the O's are in win now mode so I would not do this trade just because I don't think Baltimore is ready to start the fire sale.
                            As of right now their rotation is Tilly, Ubaldo, Gallardo, Wright and Bundy. It looks like Rodgers is on the MLB roster and starting at SS with hardy out due to injury. Its pretty crazy but we have seen 19 year olds make it to the pros just like Urias did the other night and machado was 19 when he debuted so its not to out the ordinary.
                            Follow my Twins franchise http://www.operationsports.com/Tmizzle/dynasty/

                            Comment

                            • WaitTilNextYear
                              Go Cubs Go
                              • Mar 2013
                              • 16830

                              #1919
                              Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

                              Originally posted by Tmizzle
                              As of right now their rotation is Tilly, Ubaldo, Gallardo, Wright and Bundy. It looks like Rodgers is on the MLB roster and starting at SS with hardy out due to injury. Its pretty crazy but we have seen 19 year olds make it to the pros just like Urias did the other night and machado was 19 when he debuted so its not to out the ordinary.
                              It is definitely out of the ordinary. I think you meant to say it's possible or fathomable for this to occur. 19 year olds playing in MLB is anything but ordinary these days. Go back 75 years and it was a bit more common.
                              Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines

                              Comment

                              • k_mac
                                MVP
                                • Mar 2011
                                • 2059

                                #1920
                                Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

                                Speaking of the Padres "glut" of catchers, what would you guys say Hedges value is right now?

                                Comment

                                Working...