MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

[Daonlyjmo7]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

Reddick for Kaminsky+Mejia should get it done there

Second trade depends on how Pit is doing. If they are contending, I can help you. If not, then they won't trade Hayes.

Third trade: What is Hills stats and attributes. Because irl he would command much more. But if you have an earlier roster and he is struggling maybe we could expand.

4th trade: Moran or Musgrave should get that deal done.

5th: no way the mets give Molina and Lindsay for Cozart. Cozart is a fit, but not for that package.

Question for you:
Spencer Adams, Zach Duke, Jon Danks for Shields (and maybe Jay)?

[CBoller1331]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

Reddick for Kaminsky+Mejia should get it done there

Second trade depends on how Pit is doing. If they are contending, I can help you. If not, then they won't trade Hayes.

Third trade: What is Hills stats and attributes. Because irl he would command much more. But if you have an earlier roster and he is struggling maybe we could expand.

4th trade: Moran or Musgrave should get that deal done.

5th: no way the mets give Molina and Lindsay for Cozart. Cozart is a fit, but not for that package.

Question for you:
Spencer Adams, Zach Duke, Jon Danks for Shields (and maybe Jay)?

1. sounds good

2. PIT is in the thick of the division and WC race and really needs a 1B/3B.

3. Hill's stats: 21 GS, 109.2 IP, 4.92 ERA, 1.62 WHIP, 10.34 K/9, 3.61 FIP, 2.06 WAR

4. Not sure if the DBacks would want Moran, as they already have Lamb/Drury (I know they moved Drury to OF, but still...two LHH 3B isn't ideal). They already dealt Musgrove to the Orioles for Trumbo. Maybe Robbie Ray is a better fit....maybe Ray for Daz Cameron??

5. Have a better package w/ Mets? Otherwise NYY and SF could both use Cozart.

6. Adams is probably pretty good since your simulating "eating" the money by taking back Duke + Danks

[sc050610]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

I can agree for sure. That's why this thread can sometimes be crazy and a lot of people don't use in game stats and just use real life stats. Take Gray for an example. Gray is doing terrible in real life and has been injured but in the game he is pitching outstanding. I usually go by in game stats when making deals.

That is why I made sure to include Harvey's stats as he is the center piece. I didnt mention but Mancini who is blocked by Davis was tearing it up at AAA in my franchise since I moved him up to there in early May. Mountcastle from what I read about him seems to have tremendous upside but his defense specifically his arm strength is his question mark. They project him to move over to second and on the Rockies there really isn't anyone necessarily blocking him from at least getting a shot in the next couple years. Since I am doing a 30 team control franchise, I could change his position to see what happens with him.

[Daonlyjmo7]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

Thanks for helping with the White sox trade

1. how is Valencia playing. Either way I don't see Hayes as the answer. I could see Harold Ramirez, Kevin Newman and Nick Kingham among players who could be traded. Let me know how he is playing and I will let you know.
2. Playing like that, I don't see hill getting traded. I feel like Toronto could for sure find a better option. Let me know what other teams could trade starters and how bad Toronto needs one.
3. If Ray is playing good then that's perfect.
4. Maybe Ynoa and Beccera for Cozart and a c level prospect. It's doable, but I feel like it's a slight overpay so maybe someone slightly less than Ynoa. If it was the Yankees, then Refsnyder and a pitching prospect that's not Kaprielian. I really like that trade, however it might be a slight underpay. If it's the Giants, then Shaw and Crick would be a great package. The Giants trade package is probably the most realistic, followed by the Yankees and the Mets.

[Syce]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

alright so im just in the series up against the Detroit Tigers in my blue jays franchise just before the all star break and the Cleveland Indians offered me a interesting offer. i put Bautista up on the trade block to see what i might be able to get and the Indians offered me this:

To Indians:
Jose Bautista, RF, 14.0M (final year) 90 overall 35 yrs old

To Blue Jays:
Danny Salazar, SP, 1.1M (final year) 82 overall 26 yrs old
Luke hochevar, RP, 5.3M (final year) 76 overall 32 yrs old

Right now Hochevar would replace Storen for me as storen is really struggling for me with a 5.64 ERA 22 innings pitched

[Daonlyjmo7]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

alright so im just in the series up against the Detroit Tigers in my blue jays franchise just before the all star break and the Cleveland Indians offered me a interesting offer. i put Bautista up on the trade block to see what i might be able to get and the Indians offered me this:

To Indians:
Jose Bautista, RF, 14.0M (final year) 90 overall 35 yrs old

To Blue Jays:
Danny Salazar, SP, 1.1M (final year) 82 overall 26 yrs old
Luke hochevar, RP, 5.3M (final year) 76 overall 32 yrs old

Right now Hochevar would replace Storen for me as storen is really struggling for me with a 5.64 ERA 22 innings pitched

I don't really see how this is any good for you. I would talk an all star outfielder who hits in the middle of the order for one year over a decent reliever for a year and a borderline all star pitcher for a year. The only way this could benefit you is of Bautista is struggling and Sapazar and Hochevar are pitching well. I wouldn't advise you to accept, but if you want to then realistically the Indians would be all for it.

[WaitTilNextYear]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

alright so im just in the series up against the Detroit Tigers in my blue jays franchise just before the all star break and the Cleveland Indians offered me a interesting offer. i put Bautista up on the trade block to see what i might be able to get and the Indians offered me this:

To Indians:
Jose Bautista, RF, 14.0M (final year) 90 overall 35 yrs old

To Blue Jays:
Danny Salazar, SP, 1.1M (final year) 82 overall 26 yrs old
Luke hochevar, RP, 5.3M (final year) 76 overall 32 yrs old

Right now Hochevar would replace Storen for me as storen is really struggling for me with a 5.64 ERA 22 innings pitched

You would need to be out of contention and Cleveland would need to be in 1st place to even consider a move like this. Even then I don't like this deal for Cleveland for what it would do to their starting pitching.

If you need a middle reliever to replace Storen, you could get one in a less extravagant deal than this one.

[Syce]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

You would need to be out of contention and Cleveland would need to be in 1st place to even consider a move like this. Even then I don't like this deal for Cleveland for what it would do to their starting pitching.

If you need a middle reliever to replace Storen, you could get one in a less extravagant deal than this one.

ya i realized that Salazar was on the DL for 1-2 Months so it wouldnt help me at all. besides, we are both in first place in our divisions.

[BlueJays09]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

Would DJ Davis (60 B) and Sean Read Foley (61 B) be enough for Cargo? Cargo is hitting .298 so far with 2 homers in mid June. A deal wouldn't take place for another month. Cargo spend most of this season on the DL but is back now. Also, looking at Bruce and Kemp. Don't trust Saunders to stay healthy (always injured in my franchises) and I want to move Bau to DH eventually, plus I only intend to re sign 1 of Bau or EE)

Thanks


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[epikOH]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

Would Mike Clevinger and Francisco Mejias be enough to get Khris Davis to the Indians? Khris Davis is hitting .253/.313/.507 with 19 HR, 56 RBI. Indians have a commanding lead in the Central and the As are in full fire sale mode. Stephen Vogt, Ryan Madson, Sean Doolittle and Rich Hill have all been traded.

[saintrules]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

Need some suggestions in my Cubs franchise...or someone to tell me I'm being too much of an eager beaver. This is a long term franchise to me, not just a one and done season. We know he Cubbies are stacked with talent, but something has me feeling I'm wasting a little talent.

Russell has locked in SS, Rizzo 1st, and Bryant 3rd (or OF). Baez is primed to take 2B after zobrist but with Ben on a 4-5 year deal and a decent overall, what am I to do with Baez? Soler and Schwarber are the left duo & next season I'll likely have them platoon left and Schwarber catch with Contreras and let Miggy walk. Which leaves me with potentially dealing Montero before the deadline to get something out of him, thoughts? Fowler is a beast at center and has to stay till he's up there in age. Heyward in right is okay...but I feel like the Cubs have invested in him and wouldn't deal him any time soon...the guy is in his mid twenties.

Pitching wise old man Lackey is a problem. He's got almost a 5 ERA and just cannot keep hitters off base. Hammel and Hendricks are chucking well enough to stay on the mound, but Warren is highly deserving a spot. With Lackey being way up there in age and on a larger contract, is there any realistic chance to move him?

Thanks

[Daonlyjmo7]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

Would DJ Davis (60 B) and Sean Read Foley (61 B) be enough for Cargo? Cargo is hitting .298 so far with 2 homers in mid June. A deal wouldn't take place for another month. Cargo spend most of this season on the DL but is back now. Also, looking at Bruce and Kemp. Don't trust Saunders to stay healthy (always injured in my franchises) and I want to move Bau to DH eventually, plus I only intend to re sign 1 of Bau or EE)

Thanks


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Way off. You need to offer AT LEAST one top 100 prospect.

[Daonlyjmo7]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

Would Mike Clevinger and Francisco Mejias be enough to get Khris Davis to the Indians? Khris Davis is hitting .253/.313/.507 with 19 HR, 56 RBI. Indians have a commanding lead in the Central and the As are in full fire sale mode. Stephen Vogt, Ryan Madson, Sean Doolittle and Rich Hill have all been traded.

You would need a bit more.

[Daonlyjmo7]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

Need some suggestions in my Cubs franchise...or someone to tell me I'm being too much of an eager beaver. This is a long term franchise to me, not just a one and done season. We know he Cubbies are stacked with talent, but something has me feeling I'm wasting a little talent.

Russell has locked in SS, Rizzo 1st, and Bryant 3rd (or OF). Baez is primed to take 2B after zobrist but with Ben on a 4-5 year deal and a decent overall, what am I to do with Baez? Soler and Schwarber are the left duo & next season I'll likely have them platoon left and Schwarber catch with Contreras and let Miggy walk. Which leaves me with potentially dealing Montero before the deadline to get something out of him, thoughts? Fowler is a beast at center and has to stay till he's up there in age. Heyward in right is okay...but I feel like the Cubs have invested in him and wouldn't deal him any time soon...the guy is in his mid twenties.

Pitching wise old man Lackey is a problem. He's got almost a 5 ERA and just cannot keep hitters off base. Hammel and Hendricks are chucking well enough to stay on the mound, but Warren is highly deserving a spot. With Lackey being way up there in age and on a larger contract, is there any realistic chance to move him?

Thanks

I don't think you should move Baez. He is a stud. Let him take over at second and platoon Zobrist with someone or use him as a utility man because he is so versatile. There is no way anyone would want Lackey if he is pitching so bad.

[KBLover]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

Pitching wise old man Lackey is a problem. He's got almost a 5 ERA and just cannot keep hitters off base. Hammel and Hendricks are chucking well enough to stay on the mound, but Warren is highly deserving a spot. With Lackey being way up there in age and on a larger contract, is there any realistic chance to move him?

Probably not unless a team is desperate for a #5 (ravaged by injury and depth is still looking unready in AAA) and you'd take a raw 26-27 y/o C type "prospect" maybe. But #5 a team would probably just promote/audition that from within or get someone better and move everyone else down.

I'd probably just waive/outright him (or move him to LR and option down your LR if you can if you want to keep Lackey around for depth) and play Warren or whoever else looks capable of doing better than a 5 ERA in Lackey's old spot. If someone claims him on waivers, at least you don't eat the salary to cut him so its worth dangling him out there if you do want to be rid of him. And if he clears outright waivers, he's in AAA just in case as well.