S & B's Directional/Classic MLB 22 Sliders

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • DonkeyJote
    All Star
    • Jul 2003
    • 9192

    #736
    Re: S & B's Directional/Classic/Quick Counts MLB 22 Sliders

    How do you guys not get way too many walks at user control/consistency at 4? Whenever I've tried to go below 5, I walk around 7-9 batters per game.

    Sent from my Pixel 6 using Tapatalk

    Comment

    • bryanm1982
      MVP
      • Nov 2016
      • 3793

      #737
      Re: S & B's Directional/Classic/Quick Counts MLB 22 Sliders

      Originally posted by DonkeyJote
      How do you guys not get way too many walks at user control/consistency at 4? Whenever I've tried to go below 5, I walk around 7-9 batters per game.

      Sent from my Pixel 6 using Tapatalk
      That is crazy. I’m averaging 2.6. I’ve had 0 and the high of 8 in a game. Are you letting your catcher call the pitches?
      Follow me on Twitch

      https://twitch.tv/bryanm1982

      Dodgers Franchise

      https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...it?usp=sharing

      Comment

      • DonkeyJote
        All Star
        • Jul 2003
        • 9192

        #738
        Re: S & B's Directional/Classic/Quick Counts MLB 22 Sliders

        My last game I had control at 5 and consistency at 4 and walked 9. Offspeed stuff in particular isn't anywhere close most of the time. I don't strictly go by the catcher, but I don't see how that would make a huge difference as far as general command goes. Even at 5/5, I've averaged 4.5 walks per game.

        I've just seen the 4/4 setup on a couple sets, and it's strange to me that in trying that my walks are crazy high.

        Sent from my Pixel 6 using Tapatalk

        Comment

        • DarthRambo
          MVP
          • Mar 2008
          • 6630

          #739
          Re: S & B's Directional/Classic/Quick Counts MLB 22 Sliders

          Originally posted by DonkeyJote
          My last game I had control at 5 and consistency at 4 and walked 9. Offspeed stuff in particular isn't anywhere close most of the time. I don't strictly go by the catcher, but I don't see how that would make a huge difference as far as general command goes. Even at 5/5, I've averaged 4.5 walks per game.

          I've just seen the 4/4 setup on a couple sets, and it's strange to me that in trying that my walks are crazy high.

          Sent from my Pixel 6 using Tapatalk
          I am averaging 1.95 walks per game so far. Are you not using a ball marker? We both use classic fade. Throwing blind never made sense to me. Tried it multiple times and hated it.

          Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
          Last edited by DarthRambo; 04-27-2022, 10:33 PM.
          https://www.youtube.com/DarthRambo

          Comment

          • DonkeyJote
            All Star
            • Jul 2003
            • 9192

            #740
            Re: S & B's Directional/Classic/Quick Counts MLB 22 Sliders

            Originally posted by IrishSalsa
            I am averaging 1.95 walks per game so far. Are you not using a ball marker? We both use classic fade. Throwing blind never made sense to me. Tried it multiple times and hated it.

            Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
            No I use classic fade as well. Started using it last year. Throwing blind also doesn't make much sense to me.

            I did an experiment. I went into a game at 4/4, and threw pitches without moving the cursor. These are starting middle/middle. I used Patrick Sandoval's Circle Change (85 control) and Slider (82 control) along with Framer Valdez's Sinker (77 control) and Curveball (85 control). I was just tapping the button, which from my understanding gives you the greatest control. The curve and slider are pretty much just random at that point, despite good control pitchers.

            Sent from my Pixel 6 using Tapatalk

            Comment

            • DarthRambo
              MVP
              • Mar 2008
              • 6630

              #741
              Re: S & B's Directional/Classic/Quick Counts MLB 22 Sliders

              That sort of control is going to be that way no matter the settings. To be honest those circle change locations look pretty good for a cold pitcher with minimal confidence. And idk what the break is on the slider, but where the arrows end on ball marker is the spot you're aiming. So if you didn't touch the controller then most of those look really good too depending how much break his slider has.

              The sinker pitch locations look solid imo. Curveball is the worst one but I see a lot more down than up so that's a good thing too. For a cold pitcher with minimal to low confidence in those pitches I think those are about what you'd expect. Get some foul offs and outs with a specific pitch then confidence goes up. Now the control is even better. And Idk if tapping gives you more control or not.

              It's crazy you issue so many walks. Most have a hard time issuing any at all. The confidence in each pitch plays the biggest factor in it hitting the mark or not imo though. Maybe try to aim further inside the zone? If I notice I'm missing a pitch low I aim a bit higher than where I really want it to go. If my slider is way off I aim it back some to try and get it to go where I want it. Until confidence is built up anyway. Then you can really start painting corners more frequently. Me doing that backfires though sometimes and the pitch stays up and get crushed.

              It's very much a feel when pitching using classic pitching which I assume you understand and know. Really not sure what else may help you. I struggle issuing more than two per game a lot of times.

              Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
              Last edited by DarthRambo; 04-27-2022, 10:57 PM.
              https://www.youtube.com/DarthRambo

              Comment

              • DonkeyJote
                All Star
                • Jul 2003
                • 9192

                #742
                Re: S & B's Directional/Classic/Quick Counts MLB 22 Sliders

                Originally posted by IrishSalsa
                That sort of control is going to be that way no matter the settings. To be honest those circle change locations look pretty good for a cold pitcher with minimal confidence. And idk what the break is on the slider, but where the arrows end on ball marker is the spot you're aiming. So if you didn't touch the controller then most of those look really good too depending how much break his slider has.

                The sinker pitch locations look solid imo. Curveball is the worst one but I see a lot more down than up so that's a good thing too. For a cold pitcher with minimal to low confidence in those pitches I think those are about what you'd expect. Get some foul offs and outs with a specific pitch then confidence goes up. Now the control is even better. And Idk if tapping gives you more control or not.

                It's crazy you issue so many walks. Most have a hard time issuing any at all. The confidence in each pitch plays the biggest factor in it hitting the mark or not imo though. Maybe try to aim further inside the zone? If I notice I'm missing a pitch low I aim a bit higher than where I really want it to go. If my slider is way off I aim it back some to try and get it to go where I want it. Until confidence is built up anyway. Then you can really start painting corners more frequently. Me doing that backfires though sometimes and the pitch stays up and get crushed.

                It's very much a feel when pitching using classic pitching which I assume you understand and know. Really not sure what else may help you. I struggle issuing more than two per game a lot of times.

                Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
                Fastballs in general are pretty good. Changeups feel okay. But off speed is bad. I did the same thing again with Sandoval but indicated where the pitch's end point should be. Only about half of his pitches are even in the neighborhood, and only 3 are within the equivalent of one zone of the intended target.

                And he's not really starting with low confidence. He's started with 75% overall confidence and around 50% overall.

                I did discover something weird though, and maybe I'll give it a try. Just to be more exact, I turned on pitch trail. And I discovered that the starting target for the pitch with that moved around pretty drastically, whereas it's always the same on classic. Weird.

                Like, I said, I've gotten better results raising control. And the reason I switched to Classic was because I had to pitch on Legend+ on Pinpoint and still didn't walk enough batters. So I was just honestly curious as to how I was getting such different results, and was kinda figuring I was just executing something wrong.

                Sent from my Pixel 6 using Tapatalk

                Comment

                • DarthRambo
                  MVP
                  • Mar 2008
                  • 6630

                  #743
                  Re: S & B's Directional/Classic/Quick Counts MLB 22 Sliders

                  Yeah classic is the way to go. Just as real life, start with your fastball and work in your breaking pitches. The ability to hit dead on where you aim with a slider or curveball should not be easy from the start. You'll get better as you keep using classic. At first it does feel you have very little control but the more you pitch with it the more you realize you have a lot of control in different ways than just aiming a pitch and pushing the button to throw.

                  Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
                  https://www.youtube.com/DarthRambo

                  Comment

                  • bryanm1982
                    MVP
                    • Nov 2016
                    • 3793

                    #744
                    Re: S & B's Directional/Classic MLB 22 Sliders

                    The Mariners swept the first-place Red Sox in Boston in the 4 game series. This series was actually tested with power for both teams at 3. We still want to test it to make sure it will be viable long term. Especially since it will be so unconventional. As you can see, the power is still there.

                    Game one:

                    SEA 5 8 3
                    BOS 3 12 0


                    W- Matt Brash ( 1 - 3 )
                    L- James Paxton ( 4 - 3 )
                    S- Paul Sewald ( 13 )

                    SEA SP- Brash 5 IP, 7 H, 2 ER, 1 BB, 5 K, 5.79 ERA
                    BOS SP- Paxton 4 IP, 5 H, 5 ER, 1 BB, 2 K, 4.94 ERA

                    SEA HRs- France (8) Winker (21) Suarez (7)
                    BOS HRs- Devers (12)

                    PotG- Sewald SV, 1 IP, 1 BB, 3 K

                    Notes - Suarez hit his 200th HR. Devers extended his hitting streak to 20 games.

                    Game two:

                    SEA 3 7 0
                    BOS 1 4 1


                    W- Mike Foltynewicz ( 2 - 0 )
                    L- Chris Sale ( 6 - 1 )
                    S- Paul Sewald ( 14 )

                    SEA SP- Foltynewicz 6 IP, 4 H, 1 ER, 3 BB, 7 K, 0.73 ERA
                    BOS SP- Sale 5 IP, 3 H, 2 ER, 2 BB, 6 K, 3.17 ERA

                    SEA HRs- None
                    BOS HRs- None

                    PotG- Foltynewicz W, 6 IP, 4 H, 1 R, 3 BB, 7 K

                    Notes -

                    Game three:

                    SEA 10 15 1
                    BOS 0 3 1


                    W- Logan Gilbert ( 5 - 2 )
                    L- Nick Pivetta ( 1 - 4 )
                    S- None

                    SEA SP- Gilbert 6 IP, 2 H, 0 ER, 1 BB, 13 K, 2.83 ERA
                    BOS SP- Pivetta 4.2 IP, 7 H, 6 ER, 0 BB, 3 K, 7.64 ERA

                    SEA HRs- France (9)
                    BOS HRs- None

                    PotG- Gilbert W, 6 IP, 2 H, 0 R, 13 K

                    Notes - SEA had 17 total K for game. 10 runs scored with 1 solo HR

                    Game four:

                    SEA 6 10 2
                    BOS 5 8 0


                    W- Trevor Rosenthal ( 1 - 0 )
                    L- Matt Strahm ( 0 - 2 )
                    S- Paul Sewald ( 15 )

                    SEA SP- Gonzales 4 IP, 6 H, 5 ER, 1 BB, 2 K, 4.70 ERA
                    BOS SP- Houck 4 IP, 5 H, 4 ER, 1 BB, 3 K, 4.87 ERA

                    SEA HRs- Raleigh (2)
                    BOS HRs- Hernandez (2)

                    PotG- Hernandez (2) 1 for 3 - HR, 3 RBI

                    Notes - Mariners won 6 in a row. Back and forth game has it was 6-5 after 5 innings but both bullpens settled in.

                    ~~Injury news~~
                    Robbie Ray Broken Forearm 1-2 months


                    ____________________________________________

                    Up Next:

                    Athletics ( 19 - 29 , 4th AL West , 12.0 gb ) @
                    Mariners ( 31 - 17 , 1st AL West , -5.0 gb )


                    Game one: Brent Honeywell ( 3 - 3 ) 4.40 ERA vs Chris Flexen ( 6 - 2 ) 4.78 ERA

                    Game two: Gunnar Hoglund ( 1 - 6 ) 5.89 ERA vs Matt Brash ( 1 - 3 ) 5.79 ERA

                    Game three: Frankie Montas ( 1 - 5 ) 6.75 ERA vs Mike Foltynewicz ( 2 - 0 ) 0.73 ERA
                    Last edited by bryanm1982; 04-28-2022, 09:02 AM.
                    Follow me on Twitch

                    https://twitch.tv/bryanm1982

                    Dodgers Franchise

                    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...it?usp=sharing

                    Comment

                    • Head Coach
                      Banned
                      • May 2005
                      • 601

                      #745
                      Re: S & B's Directional/Classic MLB 22 Sliders

                      Originally posted by bryanm1982
                      The Mariners swept the first-place Red Sox in Boston in the 4 game series. This series was actually tested with power for both teams at 3. We still want to test it to make sure it will be viable long term. Especially since it will be so unconventional. As you can see, the power is still there.

                      Game one:

                      SEA 5 8 3
                      BOS 3 12 0


                      W- Matt Brash ( 1 - 3 )
                      L- James Paxton ( 4 - 3 )
                      S- Paul Sewald ( 13 )

                      SEA SP- Brash 5 IP, 7 H, 2 ER, 1 BB, 5 K, 5.79 ERA
                      BOS SP- Paxton 4 IP, 5 H, 5 ER, 1 BB, 2 K, 4.94 ERA

                      SEA HRs- France (8) Winker (21) Suarez (7)
                      BOS HRs- Devers (12)

                      PotG- Sewald SV, 1 IP, 1 BB, 3 K

                      Notes - Suarez hit his 200th HR. Devers extended his hitting streak to 20 games.

                      Game two:

                      SEA 3 7 0
                      BOS 1 4 1


                      W- Mike Foltynewicz ( 2 - 0 )
                      L- Chris Sale ( 6 - 1 )
                      S- Paul Sewald ( 14 )

                      SEA SP- Foltynewicz 6 IP, 4 H, 1 ER, 3 BB, 7 K, 0.73 ERA
                      BOS SP- Sale 5 IP, 3 H, 2 ER, 2 BB, 6 K, 3.17 ERA

                      SEA HRs- None
                      BOS HRs- None

                      PotG- Foltynewicz W, 6 IP, 4 H, 1 R, 3 BB, 7 K

                      Notes -

                      Game three:

                      SEA 10 15 1
                      BOS 0 3 1


                      W- Logan Gilbert ( 5 - 2 )
                      L- Nick Pivetta ( 1 - 4 )
                      S- None

                      SEA SP- Gilbert 6 IP, 2 H, 0 ER, 1 BB, 13 K, 2.83 ERA
                      BOS SP- Pivetta 4.2 IP, 7 H, 6 ER, 0 BB, 3 K, 7.64 ERA

                      SEA HRs- France (9)
                      BOS HRs- None

                      PotG- Gilbert W, 6 IP, 2 H, 0 R, 13 K

                      Notes - SEA had 17 total K for game. 10 runs scored with 1 solo HR

                      Game four:

                      SEA 6 10 2
                      BOS 5 8 0


                      W- Trevor Rosenthal ( 1 - 0 )
                      L- Matt Strahm ( 0 - 2 )
                      S- Paul Sewald ( 15 )

                      SEA SP- Gonzales 4 IP, 6 H, 5 ER, 1 BB, 2 K, 4.70 ERA
                      BOS SP- Houck 4 IP, 5 H, 4 ER, 1 BB, 3 K, 4.87 ERA

                      SEA HRs- Raleigh (2)
                      BOS HRs- Hernandez (2)

                      PotG- Hernandez (2) 1 for 3 - HR, 3 RBI

                      Notes - Mariners won 6 in a row. Back and forth game has it was 6-5 after 5 innings but both bullpens settled in.

                      ~~Injury news~~
                      Robbie Ray Broken Forearm 1-2 months


                      ____________________________________________

                      Up Next:

                      Athletics ( 19 - 29 , 4th AL West , 12.0 gb ) @
                      Mariners ( 31 - 17 , 1st AL West , -5.0 gb )


                      Game one: Brent Honeywell ( 3 - 3 ) 4.40 ERA vs Chris Flexen ( 6 - 2 ) 4.78 ERA

                      Game two: Gunnar Hoglund ( 1 - 6 ) 5.89 ERA vs Matt Brash ( 1 - 3 ) 5.79 ERA

                      Game three: Frankie Montas ( 1 - 5 ) 6.75 ERA vs Mike Foltynewicz ( 2 - 0 ) 0.73 ERA
                      Your team is getting better as the year goes on.

                      Do you play all your games in the modern stadiums?
                      I want to play some games at Shea Stadium.
                      Do you think that would ruin the realism?

                      Comment

                      • bryanm1982
                        MVP
                        • Nov 2016
                        • 3793

                        #746
                        Re: S & B's Directional/Classic MLB 22 Sliders

                        Originally posted by Head Coach
                        Your team is getting better as the year goes on.

                        Do you play all your games in the modern stadiums?
                        I want to play some games at Shea Stadium.
                        Do you think that would ruin the realism?
                        I would think that would be pretty cool. I don't think it would ruin the realism. Now if you did the really old stadiums with the huge outfields that might hurt your HR numbers lol.

                        I'm on the PS5 and I have found a created stadium for the new Oakland stadium so I'm going to use that for the A's when I play there.
                        Follow me on Twitch

                        https://twitch.tv/bryanm1982

                        Dodgers Franchise

                        https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...it?usp=sharing

                        Comment

                        • Head Coach
                          Banned
                          • May 2005
                          • 601

                          #747
                          Re: S & B's Directional/Classic MLB 22 Sliders

                          Originally posted by bryanm1982
                          I would think that would be pretty cool. I don't think it would ruin the realism. Now if you did the really old stadiums with the huge outfields that might hurt your HR numbers lol.

                          I'm on the PS5 and I have found a created stadium for the new Oakland stadium so I'm going to use that for the A's when I play there.
                          Thanks .
                          When I play the Braves on the road I want to use the old Atlanta stadium.

                          It helps keep the game fun when you play all 162.
                          I will have to look at some created ones.

                          Comment

                          • bryanm1982
                            MVP
                            • Nov 2016
                            • 3793

                            #748
                            Re: S & B's Directional/Classic MLB 22 Sliders

                            Originally posted by Head Coach
                            Thanks .
                            When I play the Braves on the road I want to use the old Atlanta stadium.

                            It helps keep the game fun when you play all 162.
                            I will have to look at some created ones.
                            That kind of makes me want to do a National League franchise just to see the NL parks. When I played the Mets in that series, the sounds of those planes are really cool.
                            Follow me on Twitch

                            https://twitch.tv/bryanm1982

                            Dodgers Franchise

                            https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...it?usp=sharing

                            Comment

                            • Head Coach
                              Banned
                              • May 2005
                              • 601

                              #749
                              Re: S & B's Directional/Classic MLB 22 Sliders

                              Originally posted by bryanm1982
                              That kind of makes me want to do a National League franchise just to see the NL parks. When I played the Mets in that series, the sounds of those planes are really cool.
                              Likewise for me and the American League.
                              I really want to do a Marlins one next but I might have to try an AL team.

                              Funny you mention the planes. I am so used to seeing the planes that I don't even pay them any attention any more.

                              Comment

                              • DonkeyJote
                                All Star
                                • Jul 2003
                                • 9192

                                #750
                                Re: S & B's Directional/Classic/Quick Counts MLB 22 Sliders

                                I play DD some besides Franchise, and I'll normally bounce around the different parks (including classics) when I play that. Right now my favorites have been Comerica, the old Rangers park, and Sportsman's.

                                Sent from my Pixel 6 using Tapatalk

                                Comment

                                Working...