</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
cub said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
lnin0 said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
asianflow said:
As for EA, the reason their games sell so well is because they makes great games. Look at the reviews of their games, and the majority are excellent.
If EA produced crap, then they wouldn't have so many million selling franchises.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">Ummm...how do you explain that crap they call Medal of Honor Rising Sun being a top 5 seller last holiday. The game was horrible. I bet you still remember the pretty CGI ads of a torpedo cutting through the water that you saw all Christmas long, though.
Anyway, I am just saying everything is not as clear cut as you make it sound.
While Im venting on this whole MVP subject thing....
I for one was a bit taken back when I saw the poll on the front page which has MVP trouncing all other baseball games this season as the 'most wanted'. Here I thought this site was a much more open minded sim community than the IGN boards and there sits an EA game. Not that EA doens't make some great sports game, but a game, that while markedly improved last year, still was running third by my last count.
And so far this year all we have to go by is the pre-release hype machines from all the camps and this back-from-the-stink-pile-just-one-year-ago MVP game is running away with the race? I mean, even with football and basketball the poll has never been so lop-sided especially for a game still on training wheels.
Anyway, those are just my thoughts. I could care less what game people enjoy and buy ... although if the poll margins equates to sales revenue I hope we all still have choices next season as well.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
That was probably the most well-written post I've seen here in months - regardless of content.
Just so happens that I agree with you, though.

EA games sale and are incredibly popular regardless of merit. Maybe the game's good, maybe it's awful - but that has very little impact on hype and sales for any of their games.
The OS guys are usually very pessimistic and quick to spot flaws in games. That's why I was so stunned when they played the MVP beta at an EA event and came back telling the boards - to a person - that it was a virtually flawless game. I mean, they were making blanket statements like that right away. That really threw me.
Now that I've seen videos of it, I can definitely say that it looks 100 percent like an EA game... the Madden/SSX/NBA Live/FIFA of baseball. In my book, that's good and bad. But obviously the OS guys only see the upside... which really surprises me. Everytime they get asked about a feature the game doesn't have or something that it doesn't do as well as other titles, they always give the same answer: "Yeah, but that doesn't really bother me at all."
I guess that's what it comes down to.
Still, it's strange that so many things don't bother critics about MVP but seemingly smaller details DO bother them about other games.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
So now OS is biased towards EA games? Likely not- these guys are honest hard working gamers who strive for perfection (my impression anyways).
I just don't understand the whole "MVP isn't a sim" claim. How is ASB that much more of a sim than MVP? Collision detection? Putting a guy on waivers? These are nice features- not things that make a game a sim over another.
One could claim that a game like MVP which has:
Tons of hit varieties- fouls to the backstop, etc...
Different kinds of slides
Incredible fielding animations
Highly intelligent crowd noise AI
etc...
was a "sim" game. no?
I think ASB looks great...don't get me wrong- I just don't see that whole sim vs. arcade distinction between it and MVP.
Comment