</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
NYJets37 said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
NolesFanInMA said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
fossen said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
Lex said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
fossen said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
drewman011 said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
fossen said:


Are you serious?!?
Please tell me you're not serious.
My God! EA isn't defrauding anyone! Do you have even a vague concept of what the BBB is actually for?!?
Return. The. Game.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Return it and get what $30 in trade in value for an open game? Come on Fossen 10 position players in year 2 on every CPU controlled team and no player progression. I think we deserve an answer from EA
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Then get pissed at EA. Or get pissed at the game store you purchased from, and their return policy.
But the Better Business Bureau? That's utterly ridiculous.
You paid money for a game that you don't like. Move on.
Do you call the BBB when you pay $10 for a movie, and hate it? Or when you buy an album that you don't like, you call the company to complain, hoping they'll release a "patch"?
BTW - I bought the game on both platforms, and decided to stick with the Xbox version. I sold my PS2 copy for $44.95, losing a whole $5 on the deal.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
An implied warranty is that a product will work for its intended purpose. Here we have an issue and here is where your analogies fall short. Comparing a movie is apples and oranges.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Sorry - my analogy is correct.
Franchise mode works. You can play 120 years, if so desired.
You just don't like the way it works. You feel they didn't do a good job with it - but the feature is there as promised.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Okay, so how did this rather large flaw escape critique from the reviewers on this site? Fear of EA or complete incompetence by the reviewer?
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Maybe they were actually playing the games instead of simming 120 years to see what would happen?
If you wanted a baseball game to sim seasons and just be the GM, it wasn't very smart to buy this one, even if the player progression was perfect.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
That's not what I wanted. I wanted a great playing baseball game with a great franchise mode. All the previews and early reviews promised me exactly that. But, what I got was a great playing baseball game with a broken, useless franchise mode.
To their credit, the player progression flaw is well hidden and I can see how OS could easily miss it. Those saying their bending over for EA are really jumping to conclusions and probably haven't even read OS' review.
Nonetheless, if people want to be vocal in their complaints, they should, by all means. This is a very large issue for some gamers (such as myself), and nothing is going to be done about it unless EA understands that fixing it will be in their best interest.

Comment