ALFONSO SORIANO: Is He The Most Complete Player in MLB?

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • paulywerner
    Rookie
    • Feb 2003
    • 147

    #151
    Re: ALFONSO SORIANO: Is He The Most Complete Player in MLB?

    </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
    I am pretty sure Arod came up as a SS. Remember he hit the majors at age 18 intitially. So I don't think there was a lot of time to change his position.



    <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

    Im trying to find minor league fielding info on him right now... also, looking for SS stats for sori in the minors

    Comment

    • SPTO
      binging
      • Feb 2003
      • 68046

      #152
      Re: ALFONSO SORIANO: Is He The Most Complete Player in MLB?

      I don't think Nomar or Tejada will go to the HOF at the end of their careers. They haven't done anything that's been too mind boggling. They've been pretty consistent over the years tho but that just makes them very durable solid players not HOF material.

      Jeter will go in due to the NY factor and his playoff accomplishments. He won't be a first ballot guy tho, would probably take him 3-5 yrs.

      A-Rod is a lock for the HOF at this rate.
      Member of the Official OS Bills Backers Club

      "Baseball is the most important thing that doesn't matter at all" - Robert B. Parker

      Comment

      • SPTO
        binging
        • Feb 2003
        • 68046

        #153
        Re: ALFONSO SORIANO: Is He The Most Complete Player in MLB?

        I don't think Nomar or Tejada will go to the HOF at the end of their careers. They haven't done anything that's been too mind boggling. They've been pretty consistent over the years tho but that just makes them very durable solid players not HOF material.

        Jeter will go in due to the NY factor and his playoff accomplishments. He won't be a first ballot guy tho, would probably take him 3-5 yrs.

        A-Rod is a lock for the HOF at this rate.
        Member of the Official OS Bills Backers Club

        "Baseball is the most important thing that doesn't matter at all" - Robert B. Parker

        Comment

        • bkrich83
          Has Been
          • Jul 2002
          • 71582

          #154
          Re: ALFONSO SORIANO: Is He The Most Complete Player in MLB?

          Damn, if I knew it was gonna go this long, we could have just started up a chat session.

          I am outta here boys, the sun is out, and the beach is calling my name. Be back later tonight.

          Tracking my NCAA Coach Career

          Comment

          • bkrich83
            Has Been
            • Jul 2002
            • 71582

            #155
            Re: ALFONSO SORIANO: Is He The Most Complete Player in MLB?

            Damn, if I knew it was gonna go this long, we could have just started up a chat session.

            I am outta here boys, the sun is out, and the beach is calling my name. Be back later tonight.

            Tracking my NCAA Coach Career

            Comment

            • MVPlaya
              Banned
              • Mar 2003
              • 874

              #156
              Re: ALFONSO SORIANO: Is He The Most Complete Player in MLB?

              Ernie Banks is one of the best SS's of all time...no doubt. But you have never seen him play. A-rod did put up better numbers, alot better.

              If this arguement is about who's better, its a-rod of course.

              If this is who revolutionized it more, I believe its A-Rod.

              From 1955-1960, was when Banks was in his prime and belted 40 + homers and 100+ RBI's. He was injured one season tho so he only played 130 games.

              From there after, he started to fall in the Offensive categories. He never batted for a great avg, only 2 seasons he batted over 300. He always batted under 300.



              Comment

              • MVPlaya
                Banned
                • Mar 2003
                • 874

                #157
                Re: ALFONSO SORIANO: Is He The Most Complete Player in MLB?

                Ernie Banks is one of the best SS's of all time...no doubt. But you have never seen him play. A-rod did put up better numbers, alot better.

                If this arguement is about who's better, its a-rod of course.

                If this is who revolutionized it more, I believe its A-Rod.

                From 1955-1960, was when Banks was in his prime and belted 40 + homers and 100+ RBI's. He was injured one season tho so he only played 130 games.

                From there after, he started to fall in the Offensive categories. He never batted for a great avg, only 2 seasons he batted over 300. He always batted under 300.



                Comment

                • paulywerner
                  Rookie
                  • Feb 2003
                  • 147

                  #158
                  Re: ALFONSO SORIANO: Is He The Most Complete Player in MLB?

                  </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                  I don't know. Has Jeter, Nomar or Tejada even come close to putting up Arod's numbers? I know Jeter hasnt put up great numbers but his WS wins and post season contributions should help him. But I don't know about Nomar or Tejada.



                  <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
                  Nomar is a better hitter in Fenway then anywhere else.... he has Todd Helton disease(not to take anything away from todd, hes a great ball player, but i think Ozzie Smith would have hit 20 homers a season hitting in Coors)... Tejada just looks so solid and clutch. Jeter is Mr. November yes, that might help his chances for the hall, but he is one of the most consistant players around... just missed .300 last season, would have made it 7 straight if im not mistaken... he can hit for power, but chooses to use the entire field instead... 1999 he hit 24 homers, and 100+ RBI's in the #1, and #2 spot in the lineup.... and nobody does the charge and throw on slow grounders at SS better than him.

                  Comment

                  • paulywerner
                    Rookie
                    • Feb 2003
                    • 147

                    #159
                    Re: ALFONSO SORIANO: Is He The Most Complete Player in MLB?

                    </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                    I don't know. Has Jeter, Nomar or Tejada even come close to putting up Arod's numbers? I know Jeter hasnt put up great numbers but his WS wins and post season contributions should help him. But I don't know about Nomar or Tejada.



                    <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
                    Nomar is a better hitter in Fenway then anywhere else.... he has Todd Helton disease(not to take anything away from todd, hes a great ball player, but i think Ozzie Smith would have hit 20 homers a season hitting in Coors)... Tejada just looks so solid and clutch. Jeter is Mr. November yes, that might help his chances for the hall, but he is one of the most consistant players around... just missed .300 last season, would have made it 7 straight if im not mistaken... he can hit for power, but chooses to use the entire field instead... 1999 he hit 24 homers, and 100+ RBI's in the #1, and #2 spot in the lineup.... and nobody does the charge and throw on slow grounders at SS better than him.

                    Comment

                    • paulywerner
                      Rookie
                      • Feb 2003
                      • 147

                      #160
                      Re: ALFONSO SORIANO: Is He The Most Complete Player in MLB?

                      </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                      Damn, if I knew it was gonna go this long, we could have just started up a chat session.

                      I am outta here boys, the sun is out, and the beach is calling my name. Be back later tonight.



                      <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                      Comment

                      • paulywerner
                        Rookie
                        • Feb 2003
                        • 147

                        #161
                        Re: ALFONSO SORIANO: Is He The Most Complete Player in MLB?

                        </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                        Damn, if I knew it was gonna go this long, we could have just started up a chat session.

                        I am outta here boys, the sun is out, and the beach is calling my name. Be back later tonight.



                        <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                        Comment

                        • MVPlaya
                          Banned
                          • Mar 2003
                          • 874

                          #162
                          Re: ALFONSO SORIANO: Is He The Most Complete Player in MLB?

                          its not really that funny.

                          Comment

                          • MVPlaya
                            Banned
                            • Mar 2003
                            • 874

                            #163
                            Re: ALFONSO SORIANO: Is He The Most Complete Player in MLB?

                            its not really that funny.

                            Comment

                            • paulywerner
                              Rookie
                              • Feb 2003
                              • 147

                              #164
                              Re: ALFONSO SORIANO: Is He The Most Complete Player in MLB?

                              </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                              Ernie Banks is one of the best SS's of all time...no doubt. But you have never seen him play. A-rod did put up better numbers, alot better.

                              If this arguement is about who's better, its a-rod of course.

                              If this is who revolutionized it more, I believe its A-Rod.

                              From 1955-1960, was when Banks was in his prime and belted 40 + homers and 100+ RBI's. He was injured one season tho so he only played 130 games.

                              From there after, he started to fall in the Offensive categories. He never batted for a great avg, only 2 seasons he batted over 300. He always batted under 300.





                              <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                              First off, this is more about the numbers that you pulled off of the MLB.com stats page... Its about how complete a player is compared to his competition he faced... Banks faced better pitching, in bigger ballparks.... If you look at his numbers on the downslide, mid 60's til the end of his career, thats about the time, places like the toiletdome in houston, busche in STL, and all the cookie cutters in the NL... everyones numbers went down, expansion watered down the pitching talent in the 70's.... he faced great pitching, and great defensive teams, and put up those numbers... not that there is any defense for a home run, but just trying to make a point

                              Comment

                              • paulywerner
                                Rookie
                                • Feb 2003
                                • 147

                                #165
                                Re: ALFONSO SORIANO: Is He The Most Complete Player in MLB?

                                </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                                Ernie Banks is one of the best SS's of all time...no doubt. But you have never seen him play. A-rod did put up better numbers, alot better.

                                If this arguement is about who's better, its a-rod of course.

                                If this is who revolutionized it more, I believe its A-Rod.

                                From 1955-1960, was when Banks was in his prime and belted 40 + homers and 100+ RBI's. He was injured one season tho so he only played 130 games.

                                From there after, he started to fall in the Offensive categories. He never batted for a great avg, only 2 seasons he batted over 300. He always batted under 300.





                                <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                                First off, this is more about the numbers that you pulled off of the MLB.com stats page... Its about how complete a player is compared to his competition he faced... Banks faced better pitching, in bigger ballparks.... If you look at his numbers on the downslide, mid 60's til the end of his career, thats about the time, places like the toiletdome in houston, busche in STL, and all the cookie cutters in the NL... everyones numbers went down, expansion watered down the pitching talent in the 70's.... he faced great pitching, and great defensive teams, and put up those numbers... not that there is any defense for a home run, but just trying to make a point

                                Comment

                                Working...